TIL: there's actually *lots* of spins on the fence equality/equity meme.
https://www.google.com/search?... https://t.co/hMhlaGGage

蒂尔：事实上，有很多关于平等/公平模因的旋转。
https://www.google.com/search?... https://t.co/hMhlaGGage

@robertwiblin @HenryACHoward Particularly because plenty of non-nerds are interested in AI safety too.

@robertwiblin@HenryACHoward特别是因为很多非书呆子也对人工智能安全感兴趣。

@robertwiblin @HenryACHoward Eh I do think that the details of AI friendliness theory are easier for nerds to get excited about than clean water and bednets.
So the effect is real to some extent, but that doesn't invalidate the importance of AI research in any way.

@robertwiblin@HenryACHoward呃，我确实认为人工智能友好理论的细节比干净的水和蚊帐更容易让书呆子们兴奋。
因此，这种影响在某种程度上是真实的，但这并不意味着人工智能研究的重要性在任何方面都是无效的。

@ne0liberal https://slatestarcodex.com/201... https://t.co/42MVV5Us8W

@自由派https://slatestarcodex.com/201...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/42MVV5Us8W

@30xHans Culture is set by elites, who would mostly not be protected by what I propose. So while I totally agree that risk should be considered, I expect it might not be large in practice.

@30X人的文化是由精英们创造的，他们大多不会受到我提议的保护。因此，虽然我完全同意应该考虑风险，但我预计在实践中风险可能不会很大。

@santisiri @Ronte50867673 @danrobinson Me alabas demasiado, solo puedo hablar un poco.... tengo que pasar 500 dias en españa o america latina como he pasado 500 dias en china, y quizas voy a hablar mejor.

“santisiri”ronte50867673“danrobinson你赞美我太多了，我只能说一点…我在西班牙或拉丁美洲呆了500天，就像我在中国呆了500天一样，也许我会说得更好。

@ameensol You should have started with $1 imo. People can relate to the idea of non-American dollars that have something close to but not quite a 1:1 exchange rate.

@ameensol你应该从imo的1美元开始。人们可能会想到非美元的汇率接近但不完全是1:1。

@danrobinson Handle exchanges using some explicit separate process.

@danrobinson使用一些明确的单独流程处理交换。

@danrobinson Short term, don't worry and accept the imperfection. Longer term, ZK proof of humanity or other POAPs/SBTs.

@丹罗宾逊：短期内，不要担心，接受不完美。长期来看，ZK证明人性或其他POAP/SBT。

The obvious precedent is FDIC insurance (up to $250k per person)
An interesting unrelated one is Singapore employment law. Stronger regulation for low-earning employees, and a more figure-it-out-yourself approach for the wealthier.
IMO things like this are good hybrid formulas. https://t.co/25XkfE8UVc

显而易见的先例是FDIC保险（每人高达25万美元）
一个有趣的不相关的是新加坡就业法。对低收入员工实行更严格的监管，对富人采取更明智的做法。
在我看来，这是很好的混合公式。https://t.co/25XkfE8UVc

Strongly support this. Coordinated sympathy and relief for the average UST smallholder who got told something dumb about "20% interest rates on the US dollar" by an influencer, personal responsibility and SFYL for the wealthy. https://twitter.com/PersianCap...

强烈支持这一点。协调对普通UST小农的同情和救济，他们被一个影响者、个人责任和SFYL告诉了一些愚蠢的关于“美元利率20%”的事情。https://twitter.com/PersianCap...

@wolftivy Excel should rebrand itself to a "functional reactive programming language".

@wolftivy Excel应该将自己重新命名为“函数式反应式编程语言”。

@sassal0x @technocrypto Agree hard on this, with the one quibble that "algostable" has become a propaganda term serving to legitimize uncollateralized stables by putting them in the same bucket as collateralized stables like DAI/RAI, and we need to really emphasize that the two are very different.

@sassal0x@technocrypto对此非常赞同，有一种说法是，“算法稳定”已经成为一个宣传术语，通过将无抵押马厩与DAI/RAI等抵押马厩放在同一个桶中，从而使其合法化，我们需要真正强调的是，这两者是非常不同的。

RT: Stop "experimenting" with ponzis, algostables, yield farming and other unsustainable nonsense.
Start experimenting with public goods funding, governance/DAOs, decentralized identity/reputation, regenerative finance and privacy tools.
This is the gwei.

RT：停止“试验”庞氏骗局、阿尔戈马厩、高产农业和其他不可持续的胡说八道。
开始尝试公共品融资、治理/DAO、分散的身份/声誉、再生金融和隐私工具。
这是gwei。

RT: [New Post] zkPairing: zkSNARKs for Elliptic Curve Pairings
@jonathanpwang, @vvhuang_, and @theyisun present elliptic curve pairings in circom--unlocking BLS signatures, recursive verification, polynomial commitment verification, and more in groth16 (1/n)
https://0xparc.org/blog/zk-pai...

转发：[New Post]zkPairing:椭圆曲线对的zkSNARKs
@jonathanpwang、@vvhuang_uu和@theyisun在circom中展示椭圆曲线对——在groth16（1/n）中解锁BLS签名、递归验证、多项式承诺验证等
https://0xparc.org/blog/zk-pai...

@llllvvuu @MikeSylphDapps @evan_van_ness @glenweyl @pujaohlhaver SBTs don't have to be revocable. I think the intent of the piece is that revocation / edit-by-issuer is *sometimes* a useful functionality, but you can still do lots of really cool stuff without it.

@llllvvuu@Mikesylphdaps@evan_van_ness@glenweyl@pujaohlhaver SBT不必是可撤销的。我认为这篇文章的目的是，发行人撤销/编辑有时是一个有用的功能，但没有它，你仍然可以做很多非常酷的事情。

@v_almonacid Because a pool that wanted to evade it could just present itself as N separate pools.

@v_almonacid，因为一个想要躲避它的池可能只会呈现为N个独立的池。

@Rob1Ham Bitcoin community had to make a pretty serious social campaign to deal with mining pool centralization on multiple occasions.

@Rob1Ham比特币社区不得不在多个场合开展相当严肃的社会活动，以应对采矿池集中问题。

@Charles51680628 That's even better. Incentivizes solo staking.

@查理51680628那就更好了。激励单人下注。

Speculative controversial take: we should legitimize price gouging by top stake pool providers. Like, if a stake pool controls > 15%, it should be accepted and even *expected* for the pool to keep increasing its fee rate until it goes back below 15%. https://twitter.com/superphiz/...

投机性的有争议的做法：我们应该让顶级股份池提供商的价格欺诈合法化。比如，如果股份池控制>；15%应该被接受，甚至“期望”泳池继续提高收费率，直到低于15%。https://twitter.com/superphiz/...