Aeon 的最新消息

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA Costco $5/ea. Other than that in the US they're usually $7 or more. Both outrageously overpriced. If you have a way to get them from another country they're usually much cheaper.

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA Costco 5 美元/个。除了在美国,它们通常是 7 美元或更多。两者价格都高得离谱。如果你有办法从另一个国家得到它们,它们通常会便宜得多。

发表时间:2小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JordanMRoberts @TRyanGregory Someone please make list of governments being advised by McKinsey.

@JordanMRoberts @TRyanGregory 有人请列出麦肯锡建议的政府名单。

发表时间:2小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Flu vaccine is once a year, many take it every single year, some people supposedly take it twice in a year. Have been used for decades and not harmful, but not all that effective either.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 流感疫苗每年接种一次,很多人每年接种一次,有些人据说一年接种两次。已经使用了几十年并且无害,但也不是那么有效。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 I went to a funeral reception with 300 people in April. It was outdoors (tent) several hours and everyone was asked to self-test before coming. A few tested positive and didn't go. No one got infected at the funeral as far as I know. Zero risk? Nope, but pretty low.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 4 月份我参加了一个有 300 人的葬礼招待会。几个小时在户外(帐篷),每个人都被要求在来之前进行自我测试。一些测试呈阳性并没有去。据我所知,没有人在葬礼上被感染。零风险?没有,但是很低。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 It probably doesn't really matter. Just not that effective against infection. People without boosters have gotten Omicron 2+ times as well.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 这可能并不重要。只是对感染没有那么有效。没有助推器的人也得到了 Omicron 2 次。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Oh, it's quite possible, but risk is not absolute. Restaurants and similar outdoors seems to be quite low risk, especially if not ultra crowded. I don't personally know of ANY instances of someone getting infected that way, but I'm sure it's happened. Again, all degree.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 哦,这很有可能,但风险不是绝对的。餐馆和类似的户外活动似乎风险很低,尤其是如果不是非常拥挤的话。我个人不知道有人以这种方式感染的任何实例,但我确信它已经发生了。再次,所有学位。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA Curious to see if that works!
If not, you might need to try a customer service line, phone tree, etc. And those generally suck! Good luck.

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 想知道这是否有效!
如果没有,您可能需要尝试客户服务热线、电话树等。这些通常很糟糕!祝你好运。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 There are some people in this group who did get covid, generally by deciding at one time or another to be less cautious (e.g. work party, got from college roommate, etc.). But guess what? Didn't pass it on even to immediate family. Again, it's a choice how to approach risk.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 这个群体中有些人确实感染了新冠病毒,通常是因为有时决定不那么谨慎(例如工作聚会,从大学室友那里得到等等)。但猜猜怎么了?甚至没有传给直系亲属。同样,如何应对风险也是一种选择。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 If you choose to roll the dice with a poorly understood rapidly changing virus 1-2 times per year, go right ahead. I'm all for personal choice within reason. But it's a choice.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 如果您选择每年 1-2 次用一种了解甚少的快速变化的病毒来掷骰子,那就继续吧。我完全是出于个人的合理选择。但这是一个选择。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Beg to differ. Not "all" getting this virus 1-2 times per year. If you try, you can get it a lot less than that. In my circle there is almost no covid in 3 years, despite socializing (safely), going to bars and restaurants (outdoors), even high risk jobs (w/good mask).

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 求不同。不是“所有人”每年都会感染这种病毒 1-2 次。如果你尝试,你能得到的比这少得多。在我的圈子里,尽管社交(安全)、去酒吧和餐馆(户外),甚至是高风险工作(戴好口罩),但在我的圈子里,3 年内几乎没有新冠病毒。

发表时间:4小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jonovision_man @CoronaReduit @ChGefaell The whole thing is absurd
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@siilinoor @CoronaReduit @chefofmembers @ChGefaell Be aware this isn't even for the full year. It is a cherry picked four month period out of each year.

发表时间:7小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@jonovision_man @CoronaReduit @ChGefaell 整个事情都是荒谬的
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@siilinoor @CoronaReduit @chefofmembers @ChGefaell 请注意,这甚至不是全年。这是每年四个月的樱桃采摘期。

发表时间:5小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA The issue here is, they may have set up a process for costs with no up front cost, but make it difficult for you to find. Be persistent.
https://www.cms.gov/how-to-get... https://t.co/0Qyk1ZkWyz

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 这里的问题是,他们可能已经建立了一个没有预付费用的成本流程,但让你很难找到。坚持不懈。
https://www .cms.gov/how-to-get... https://t.co/0Qyk1ZkWyz

发表时间:5小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA No idea, you'll have to ask them. They probably have a partner because if they don't you can get reimbursed for really expensive tests (and better) like Lucira, and most insurers don't want to do that. With a pathway for direct payment they can cap the reimbursement at $12/test.

@vardaanbhat @FinchTH @BlueShieldCA 不知道,你得问问他们。他们可能有一个合作伙伴,因为如果他们不这样做,您可以获得像 Lucira 这样的非常昂贵的测试(甚至更好)的报销,而大多数保险公司不想这样做。通过直接付款的途径,他们可以将报销限制在 12 美元/次。

发表时间:5小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LGray15 @mtracey Nope, he won't.

@LGray15 @mtracey 不,他不会。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@strxwmxn @mtracey No, he doesn't.

@strxwmxn @mtracey 不,他没有。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Offit really only questions the 3rd/etc. shot for people who are both very healthy (incl not obese) and young. If you're in that category, your risk is really low regardless of doses. For everyone else, he recognizes that it is an effective three dose vaccine for severe disease.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 Offit 真的只质疑第三个/等等。为非常健康(包括不肥胖)和年轻的人拍摄。如果您属于该类别,则无论剂量如何,您的风险都非常低。对于其他所有人,他承认这是一种有效的治疗严重疾病的三剂疫苗。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 That's literally survivorship bias. Three doses clearly more effective than two. You got slightly lucky (I assume only slightly because you're probably pretty low risk no matter how many doses).

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 这实际上是幸存者偏见。三剂明显比两剂更有效。你有点幸运(我假设只是因为无论服用多少剂量,你的风险都可能相当低)。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@spooknine Don't forget the nuclear risk and other risks of some alternative policy path. It's selectively and deceptively ignored by the dude you just quoted.

@spooknine 不要忘记某些替代政策路径的核风险和其他风险。你刚才引用的那个家伙选择性地和欺骗性地忽略了它。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 3 doses w/China vaccine clearly better than 2 doses mRNA at this point (Omicron) too.

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 3 剂中国疫苗在这一点上也明显优于 2 剂 mRNA(Omicron)。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 No. Look at the numbers. Unvaxed old people is a problem. Fully vaxed people (3 doses), whether old or not, is not ideal, some still die, but not really different from anywhere else.
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten... Important data from HongKong, showing increasing levels of protection from symptomatic and severe disease for the different vaccines in use. Coronavac lower for 2 dose, but at similar level as BNT162b2 for three doses. Vaccines work. https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:6个月前 作者:Marion Koopmans @MarionKoopmans

@Liberalism2021 @paulalexlewis @DonaldWelsh16 @ironandwine11 不。看看数字。未打疫苗的老人是个问题。完全接种疫苗的人(3 剂),无论是否老,都不理想,有些人仍然死亡,但与其他任何地方并没有真正的不同。
https://twitter.com/MarionKoop...

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...来自香港的重要数据显示,使用中的不同疫苗对症状性和严重疾病的防护水平不断提高。Coronavac在2剂中较低,但在三剂中与BNT162b2的水平相似。疫苗有效。https://t.co/JF2KKjsLlN

发表时间:7小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情