用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@AnaCabrera @CDCDirector Nonsensical answer for indoor dining.
How about just "no"?

@AnaCabrera@CDC主管室内就餐的荒谬回答。
就说“不”怎么样?

发表时间:11小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Dan_Donovan_17 @Ryan_Mac_Phd @meganlaser First big dense city where a sustained transmission chain established (hypothetical). Somewhat luck.

@Dan_Donovan_17@Ryan_Mac_Phd@meganlaser第一个建立了持续传输链的大型密集城市(假设)。有点运气。

发表时间:13小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrEricDing @CanadiensMTL @Canucks Next time:
https://www.ktnv.com/news/coro...

通过honeybunny www.addic7ed.com同步
https://www.ktnv.com/news/coro...

发表时间:18小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrEricDing @CanadiensMTL @Canucks Should have gone to the 100% vaccinated strip club instead of the other one.

@drericing@CanadiensMTL@Canucks应该去100%接种疫苗的脱衣舞俱乐部而不是另一个。

发表时间:18小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@charcware @BaldingsWorld They might have even slightly optimized the virus for human infection too, instead of leaving it to a few tiny mutations to improve it by 3x or more.

@charcware@BaldingsWorld说,他们甚至可能对病毒进行了轻微的优化,使其适合人类感染,而不是将其留给一些微小的突变,使其提高3倍或更多。

发表时间:18小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl In fact business was booming so much that they got taxpayers to cover their payroll. Twice. https://t.co/rX16dOatjx

@事实上,wsbgnl的生意非常兴隆,以至于他们让纳税人来支付他们的工资。两次。https://t.co/rX16dOatjx

发表时间:19小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl Business was booming in May 2020 because people wanted saunas, but what they really needed to succeed was employees taking their masks off in June 2021. Sure.

@wsbgnl的业务在2020年5月蓬勃发展,因为人们想要桑拿,但他们真正需要的是2021年6月员工摘下口罩。当然。

发表时间:19小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JoyceWhiteVance @Econ_Marshall @lawprofblawg This already happened last fall
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum... https://t.co/g5VbRm2paq

@乔伊斯怀特万斯@Econ\u Marshall@lawprofblawg去年秋天就已经发生了
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum... https://t.co/g5VbRm2paq

发表时间:22小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Momusik4u2 @jwehrens When you have 90% of the public in favor, you're better off making the other side block it if they want to go there.

@Momusik4u2@jwehrens当你有90%的公众支持时,如果他们想去那里,你最好让对方阻止。

发表时间:22小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrEricDing @ASlavitt It's happening already
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@BioTurboNick https://t.co/5mr9GKA8vH

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@这已经发生了
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@生物涡轮https://t.co/5mr9GKA8vH

发表时间:23小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DWUhlfelderLaw Imagine not considering the lawyers who argued that a dead guy hacked the election to be competent hires.

@德乌尔费尔德劳想象一下,如果不考虑那些律师,他们认为一个死人入侵了选举,是一个称职的雇员。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mattyglesias Not racist at all.

@mattyglesias一点也不种族主义。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NickDefabrizio @vortec4253 @Rajjah @PhillipBurgart @NateSilver538 Two seats is needed to regain the D/lib majority, but that's not what Barrett's seat did. No majority even without her. That's one seat.
No disagreement that 6/3 is stronger than 5/4.

@NickDefabrizio@vortec4253@Rajjah@PhillipBurgart@NateSilver538需要两个席位才能重新获得民主党/自由党的多数席位,但巴雷特的席位并不是这样做的。即使没有她也没有多数。只有一个座位。
6/3比5/4强,这一点没有异议。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BioTurboNick https://t.co/5mr9GKA8vH

@生物涡轮https://t.co/5mr9GKA8vH

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dr_allossery @BallouxFrancois More (potentially cherry picked) charts isn't a refutation of cherry picking. The Yale study might be different, haven't looked at it. Studies of mechanism (cold air viral survival, etc.) also contribute here.

@allossery博士的BallouxFrancois More(可能是樱桃采摘的)图表并不是对樱桃采摘的反驳。耶鲁大学的研究可能不一样,我没看过。机制研究(冷空气病毒存活等)也有助于此。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dr_allossery @BallouxFrancois Regional clusters have a different plausible explanation, which is local travel/seeding.
Also potentially cherry picked unless you analyze the entire potential population of regions, rather than ones where you know it worked out that way.

@allossery博士@BallouxFrancois区域集群有一个不同的似是而非的解释,那就是本地旅行/播种。
另外,除非你分析整个地区的潜在人口,而不是那些你知道是这样的人,否则你也可能会选择樱桃。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NickDefabrizio @vortec4253 @Rajjah @PhillipBurgart @NateSilver538 Again, adding seats is a different calculation than filling existing seats.

@NickDefabrizio@vortec4253@Rajjah@PhillipBurgart@NateSilver538同样,增加座位与填补现有座位是不同的计算方法。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dr_allossery @BallouxFrancois Without a more systematic analysis, charts like this are heavily cherry picked.

@allossery博士@BallouxFrancois没有更系统的分析,像这样的图表都是精心挑选的。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani We also MAY be able to modify some of the physical factors. For example, low indoor relative humidity from heating as been suggested as a mechanism.

@我们也可以修改一些物理因素。例如,室内相对湿度较低的取暖被认为是一种机制。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl 48 (too quickly) to 9 (too slowly) is a huge, huge spread.

@WSBGNL48(太快)到9(太慢)是一个巨大的,巨大的价差。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情