用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@Whatdoesitmake One can speculate all sorts of ways about future relief to business or students but the facts are that the business relief was far more similar in breadth to the student loan relief than you suggested, and also much more generous to each recipient.

@Whatdoesitmake One 可以推测未来对企业或学生​​的救济的各种方式,但事实是,商业救济与学生贷款救济的广度比你建议的要相似得多,而且对每个接受者也更加慷慨。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Whatdoesitmake There was no requirement that businesses be locked down nor facing imminent failure needing saving to either receive PPP loans or have those loans forgiven. The loose criteria was deliberate public policy to assist businesses very broadly when faced with challenging conditions.

@Whatdoesitmake 没有要求企业被锁定或面临迫在眉睫的失败,需要储蓄才能获得 PPP 贷款或免除这些贷款。宽松的标准是经过深思熟虑的公共政策,以在面临挑战时为企业提供非常广泛的帮助。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Lujan588 @ddiamond The poll he linked doesn't ask about mask mandates. It asks about "mask mandates and social distancing" which is quite different.

@Lujan588 @ddiamond 他链接的民意调查并未询问有关口罩的要求。它询问的是完全不同的“口罩规定和社会距离”。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NikkiMedoro @gregggonsalves @ddiamond @AshishKJha46 Democrats have passed two spending bills on a party line vote. Neither included Covid funding.

@NikkiMedoro @gregggonsalves @ddiamond @AshishKJha46 民主党人已经通过了两项关于党派投票的支出法案。两者都不包括 Covid 资金。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@phealthsean @jonlevyBU Truth be told they probably regret the clean air summit and it's being memory holed.

@phealthsean @jonlevyBU 说实话,他们可能对清洁空气峰会感到遗憾,而且它正在被遗忘。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ibrake4ants @FinchTH @CDCDirector @WHO_Europe WHO doesn't only speak to individuals.
Also, even if speaking to individuals, awareness is valuable. You may not be able to control ventilation but you can often, even if not always, choose where to go or not go.

@ibrake4ants @FinchTH @CDCDirector @WHO_Europe 世卫组织不仅与个人交谈。
此外,即使与个人交谈,意识也是有价值的。您可能无法控制通风,但您可以经常(即使并非总是)选择去哪里或不去哪里。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ryan_landay @alexmeshkin Some things are difficult and people give up. Other things are difficult and people persist, redouble effort, and/or demand policy changes. Which way it goes in this case isn't an accident at all, rather the former has been strongly encouraged.

@ryan_landay @alexmeshkin 有些事情很困难,人们放弃了。其他事情很困难,人们坚持、加倍努力和/或要求改变政策。在这种情况下采用哪种方式根本不是偶然的,而是强烈鼓励前者。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justnotatweeter @drgregkelly The effective age range in the study population (+/- 2 std) is 30 to 90.

@justnotatweeter @drgregkelly 研究人群的有效年龄范围( /- 2 标准)是 30 到 90 岁。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@apmalong "Buy in" by whom?
These people are shameless in denying that public "buy in" for mask mandates has always far outstripped "buy in" from "leaders" and "experts".

@apmalong “买进”谁?
这些人无耻地否认,公众对口罩授权的“买进”一直远远超过“领导”和“专家”的“​​买进”。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sanjay_world @DrEricDing Africa has a median age of 18. Considering how impact of this disease goes up dramatically with age, you could infect the whole continent and barely notice (slight exaggeration, but not much).

@sanjay_world @DrEricDing 非洲的平均年龄为 18 岁。考虑到这种疾病的影响如何随着年龄的增长而急剧上升,你可能会感染整个大陆而几乎没有注意到(有点夸张,但不多)。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@becs_and @Digory29 @PragmaticInOz @DrEricDing If you look at total deaths by all causes it's the same conclusion.

@becs_and @Digory29 @PragmaticInOz @DrEricDing 如果您查看所有原因造成的总死亡人数,则得出相同的结论。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@kprather88 @vinay_kishore Careful using that graph to explain HEPA. HEPA total is much higher than on the chart.

@kprather88 @vinay_kishore 小心使用该图来解释 HEPA。 HEPA 总量远高于图表上的。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@pzingg @EricTopol Singapore also had high case rates through the summer. It's probably a matter of one variant causing one relatively large surge vs a series of lesser variants causing smaller surges in sequence.

@pzingg @EricTopol 新加坡整个夏天的病例率也很高。这可能是一个变体导致一个相对较大的浪涌与一系列较小的变体依次导致较小浪涌的问题。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@queen_o_hurts @EricTopol Mask mandate matters less than whether people are masking in practice, and if so how well.

@queen_o_hurts @EricTopol 戴口罩的要求比人们在实践中是否戴口罩更重要,如果戴口罩的效果如何。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DanielleV1967 @DecorumManager It doesn't have to be for one thing. A multitude of advantages and disadvantages can be weighed in mature decision making. Long covid is certainly one of them.

@DanielleV1967 @DecorumManager 不一定是为了一件事。在成熟的决策中可以权衡许多优点和缺点。长期covid肯定是其中之一。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH Paint it all ultra black and leave it open, no one will notice either the pipes or the UVGI lights. 😉

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH 将其全部涂成黑色并保持打开状态,没有人会注意到管道或 UVGI 灯。 😉

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH Have you considered upper room UVGI? It seems to be far more mature and probably less expensive than far UV and capable of achieving very high equivalent ventilation rates.

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH 你考虑过楼上的 UVGI 吗?它似乎比远紫外线更成熟,可能更便宜,并且能够实现非常高的等效通风率。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH Why do you think that is? Some sort of historical accident or is there another long-standing motivation for the ventilation?

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH 你认为这是为什么?某种历史事故还是通风的另一个长期动机?

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH Yeah I agree with that. A lot of the smarter things like ventilation, even the cheap stuff like opening windows and fans, can substitute for degree of expensive/disruptive contact reduction (whether mandatory or not). Unfortunately it wasn't in too many places.

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH 是的,我同意这一点。许多更智能的东西,比如通风,甚至是打开窗户和风扇等便宜的东西,都可以代替昂贵/破坏性的接触减少程度(无论是否强制)。不幸的是,它没有出现在太多地方。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH Unfortunate.

@fergal_whatever @FinchTH 不幸。

发表时间:1个月前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情