用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@Derrick24094044 @Mssarahmssarah @sarahg_nyc @AmandaLPitts https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

@derrick24094044@mssarahmssarah@sarahg nyc@amandalpittshttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

发表时间:7小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NevillesMom @JCityUX @TheAngryEpi @luckytran Here's your solution
https://www.change.org/p/attor...

@NevillesMom@JCityUX@TheAngryEpi@luckytran这是您的解决方案
https://www.change.org/p/attor...

发表时间:7小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DeItaone By not doing it?

@不做这件事能让你高兴吗?

发表时间:8小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@danrucinski @b_crane1 @livrockeman @fightfor15 @katiadmi I wasn't making a value judgment. These businesses may well not be viable. The point is that balancing the labor market doesn't necessarily mean hiring more or the same total workers at higher wages, it could also mean fewer at higher wages. Not saying this is bad, it just is.

@danrucinski@b_crane1@Livrockman@fightfor15@katiadmi我没有做出价值判断。这些企业很可能无法生存。关键是平衡劳动力市场并不一定意味着以更高的工资雇佣更多或相同的工人总数,也可能意味着以更高的工资雇佣更少的工人。并不是说这不好,只是很糟糕。

发表时间:8小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@WallingfordRie1 @b_crane1 @livrockeman @fightfor15 @katiadmi Raising wages by "a nickel" won't do much. Raising wages by a few dollars in a low margin business like a restaurant or small retail can be the difference between viable or not. Don't assume there is infinite demand or infinite profit margin, there usually isn't.

@WallingfordRie1@b_crane1@Livrockman@fightfor15@katiadmi提高工资“五分之一”不会有多大作用。在餐馆或小型零售业等利润率较低的行业中提高工资几美元可能是可行与否的区别。不要假设有无限的需求或无限的利润率,通常没有。

发表时间:8小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@smlwaves @b_crane1 @livrockeman @fightfor15 @katiadmi I wouldn't assume "people at the top" of these businesses are all highly paid. There are plenty of mom and pop restaurants, retail, etc. that struggle and maybe get by or even make a decent living, but the people at the "top" are hardly Bezos.

@smlwaves@b_crane1@Livrockman@fightfor15@katiadmi我不认为这些企业的“高层”都是高薪的。有很多夫妻餐馆、零售店等,它们挣扎着,也许能勉强糊口,甚至能过上体面的生活,但“顶尖”的人几乎不是贝佐斯。

发表时间:8小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ArchoProbato @perdidostschool @uche_blackstock That would ruin the plan.

@执政官巴托@perdidostschool@uche_blackstock会毁了这个计划。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@perdidostschool @uche_blackstock And even then still only 10%

@perdidostschool@uche_blackstock,即使如此,仍然只有10%

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@UrlNat @ASlavitt This is not true, the rule (vax or test or quarantine) is the same. However, residents can quarantine at home which is not very well enforced.

@UrlNat@ASlavitt这不是真的,规则(vax或测试或隔离)是相同的。然而,居民可以在家中进行检疫,这并没有得到很好的执行。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LordWisdom6 @cannabananaRN @ASlavitt @TheePurity The moon doesn't deserve that.

@LordWisdom6@Cannabanarn@ASlavitt@moon不配这样。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ASlavitt The requirement for Hawaii is vaccinated only, no testing, and no contact tracing. Hawaii feels (and may very well be) constrained by CDC guidance stating domestic travel by vaccinated people requires no further precautions. Maybe the latter should be reconsidered.

@阿斯拉维特说,夏威夷只需要接种疫苗,没有检测,也没有接触追踪。夏威夷感到(也很可能受到)疾病预防控制中心指导的约束,即接种疫苗的人在国内旅行无需采取进一步的预防措施。也许后者应该重新考虑。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@yaneerbaryam Alternately, as some revealed preferences suggest, go for 2x.

@yaneerbaryam或者,正如一些透露的偏好所暗示的,选择2倍。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@b_crane1 @livrockeman @fightfor15 @katiadmi It does but there is another side to this (also free market capitalism). Some businesses won't be viable, reducing demand for labor. The balance will come both from attracting more labor and needing less.

@b_crane1@Livrockman@fightfor15@katiadmi确实如此,但这还有另一面(也是自由市场资本主义)。一些企业将无法生存,从而降低劳动力需求。平衡将来自吸引更多劳动力和减少需求。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Noahpinion Not making a judgment on the individuals here, but you can absolutely defraud even if you have a real product.

@不必对这里的个人做出判断,但即使你有真正的产品,你也绝对可以欺诈。

发表时间:20小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@notdred @hyperplanes You don't get sued for securities fraud by putting out bullshit hype press releases in academia.

@notdred@hyperplanes你不会因为在学术界发布胡说八道的新闻稿而被起诉证券欺诈。

发表时间:22小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@eliowa And had real lockdowns, and lockdowns into 2021, and requires rapid tests for everyday indoor activities, has higher vaccination rates, etc.
Cherry picking is dishonest.

@eliowa和eliowa进行了真正的锁定,并锁定到2021年,需要对日常室内活动进行快速检测,具有较高的疫苗接种率等。
摘樱桃是不诚实的。

发表时间:23小时前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@VincentRK Canada being older is PART of it.

@VincentRK Canada变老是其中的一部分。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @Daniel_Riou @LarryKazamias @michaelmina_lab Well that too, I added another reply. They could at least have the option of creating a sort of bubble. Not a guarantee they would go for it, but some probably would. But there just no way that these sorts of events could get the hundreds of thousands of tests needed now.

@肉豆蔻031992@Daniel_Riou@LarryKazamias@michaelmina_实验室好吧,我又补充了一个回答。他们至少可以选择制造一种泡沫。不能保证他们会去,但有些人可能会去。但这类事件不可能得到现在所需的数十万次测试。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @Daniel_Riou @LarryKazamias @michaelmina_lab Even if not society-wide, with high availability and low cost, conventions could require attendees to test every day or two. That's impossible now, there is no way to get hundreds of thousands of tests done, even if willing to pay $7 each.

@肉豆蔻031992@Daniel_Riou@LarryKazamias@michaelmina_实验室即使不是全社会范围的,由于高可用性和低成本,大会可能要求与会者每天或两天进行测试。现在这是不可能的,没有办法完成数十万个测试,即使每个都愿意支付7美元。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @Daniel_Riou @LarryKazamias @michaelmina_lab "Work" here means reduce prevalence to almost nothing, as Mina's models claim. That would very likely be enough to make a difference to conventions. That requires low cost, wide distribution, and high usage. Just you or me buying at test at a pharmacy would not.

@肉豆蔻031992@Daniel_Riou@LarryKazamias@michaelmina_实验室“工作”在这里意味着将患病率降低到几乎为零,正如Mina的模型所声称的那样。这很可能足以对公约产生影响。这需要低成本、广泛分布和高使用率。只是你或我在药店的测试中购买不会。

发表时间:1天前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情