@Leo_Glisic @avsa @TBSocialist I would put building things into economic rather than personal freedoms.
An example on the personal side might be freedom to make safety/convenience tradeoffs; in personal experience I see no correlation between that and liberal-democraticness.

@Leo_Glisic@avsa@tbi我会把建筑的东西放在经济上，而不是个人自由上。
个人方面的一个例子可能是安全/便利权衡的自由；从我个人的经验来看，这与自由民主没有任何关系。

@Leo_Glisic @avsa @TBSocialist One important reason why it's likely true in the 21st century is that political vs economic vs personal activity is increasingly difficult to cleanly separate.

@Leo_Glisic@avsa@tb社会党人在21世纪可能会这样做的一个重要原因是，政治、经济和个人活动越来越难以清晰地分开。

@Leo_Glisic @avsa @TBSocialist I think that's generally true though there are specific areas where you can find counterexamples:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@Leo_Glisic@avsa@tb我认为这通常是正确的，尽管在某些特定领域你可以找到反例：
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@Leo_Glisic @avsa @TBSocialist California is very democratic, but freedom to build houses/apartments (very important for people's livelihoods!) is highly restricted there, whereas maby authoritarian regimes have no problem letting skyscraper builders go brrrr.

@Leo_Glisic@avsa@tb社会主义加利福尼亚州非常民主，但建造房屋/公寓的自由（对人们的生计非常重要！）在那里受到高度限制，而马比独裁政权却毫不犹豫地让摩天大楼的建设者去brrrr。

@Leo_Glisic @avsa @TBSocialist You can't. But it's at least plausible (and nrx types believe) that the winners of the open public discourse / criticism game will take away more freedoms than the winners of a more centralized politcal game would.
(Again, not saying I agree, just that this is the argument)

@Leo_Glisic@avsa@tb：你做不到。但至少有可能（nrx类型的人认为），公开公开讨论/批评游戏的赢家将比更集中的政治游戏的赢家剥夺更多的自由。
（再说一遍，不是说我同意，只是说这是论点）

@avsa @TBSocialist I would even say the liberal-democratic idea that freedom to criticize the government is *the central freedom*, and much more sacred then eg. freedom to smoke weed or not wear a seatbelt is a cultural oddity.
(Doesn't mean it's not correct! It's just not *automatically* true)

@avsa@TBI甚至可以说，自由民主党的观点，即批评政府的自由是*核心自由*，比吸烟或不系安全带的自由更神圣，这是一种文化上的古怪。
（这并不意味着它是不正确的！它只是不自动地是正确的）

@avsa @TBSocialist I actually don't think there is anything inconsistent about assigning a low value to freedom to criticize the government and a high value to personal freedoms. They're very different kinds of freedom and the arguments for and against are different.

@事实上，我认为批评政府的自由价值较低，而个人自由价值较高，两者之间没有任何矛盾。它们是非常不同的自由，支持和反对的理由也不同。

@TBSocialist @avsa Have any specific writings on this topic you would recommend?

@关于这个话题，你有什么特别的文章可以推荐吗？

Further work with @pujaohlhaver @glenweyl and myself expanding on what can be done with an ecosystem of soulbound tokens! https://twitter.com/pujaohlhav...

与@pujaohlhaver@glenweyl和我进一步合作，扩展灵魂绑定代币生态系统的功能！https://twitter.com/pujaohlhav...

@Bailes97476329 @l2cash @rebecca_devaney @elonmusk @DrEliDavid None of the proposals I mentioned involve controlling people's lives or being tyrannical or even woke. I strongly support people's right to sometimes sacrifice safety for convenience.

@Bailes97476329@l2cash@rebecca_devaney@elonmusk@DrEliDavid我提到的建议中没有一个涉及到控制人们的生活、专制甚至觉醒。我强烈支持人们有时为了方便而牺牲安全的权利。

@Chainlank One of @RADVACproject's goals is making the vaccine less invasive and self-administerable without a needle!
(And prevent infection and not just severe disease)
https://www.technologyreview.c...

@Chainlank@radvac项目的目标之一是使疫苗不那么具有侵入性，并且无需针头即可自我管理！
（预防感染，而不仅仅是严重疾病）
https://www.technologyreview.c...

@MTabarrok Proof by induction is easy to reword as proof by contradiction.
"P(0) is true, P(x) implies P(x+1), therefore P(any +ve int) is true"
Becomes
"suppose P(x) is not always true. Let z be smallest x where P(z) is false. But then P(z-1) is true, so P(z) is true, contradiction!"

@归纳法证明很容易改写为矛盾证明。
P（0）为真，P（x）意味着P（x+1），因此P（any+ve int）为真
变成
“假设P（x）不总是真的。设z为最小的x，其中P（z）为假。但是P（z-1）为真，所以P（z）为真，矛盾！”

@MTabarrok https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

@巴洛克https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

@accretionist @spacefrogjew @W1seguyw1seguy @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid I'm not even the type to wear a mask everywhere. They do have serious downsides; ordering tea in starbucks and even general social interaction is *significantly* harder wearing one. But they do make sense in some situations and people who want to wear them should feel supported!

@吸积论者@spacefrogjew@W1seguyw1seguy@macrodosis@elonmusk@DrEliDavid我甚至不是那种到处戴口罩的人。它们确实有严重的缺点；在星巴克点茶，甚至在一般的社交活动中，都是一件很难穿的事。但在某些情况下，它们确实有意义，想要穿它们的人应该感到支持！

@spacefrogjew @W1seguyw1seguy @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid Actually, "wookiee skeleton" is winning:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@spacefrogjew@W1seguyw1seguy@macrodosis@elonmusk@DrEliDavid实际上，“伍基骷髅”获胜了：
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@ButtonGamble @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid Not sure what team you are lumping me in with. I oppose public health authoritarianism. I have never considered covid to be an opportunity to change the world in other ways (ok fine, I'm really happy about remote work taking off, but that's pretty much it)

@ButtonGamble@macrodosis@elonmusk@DrEliDavid不确定你把我归入哪个团队。我反对公共卫生威权主义。我从未认为新冠病毒是一个以其他方式改变世界的机会（好吧，我真的很高兴远程工作的开展，但基本上就是这样）

@1nv1nc @ButtonGamble @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid https://t.co/JKDtQAc9Ji

@1nv1nc@ButtonGamble@macrodose@elonmusk@DrEliDavidhttps://t.co/JKDtQAc9Ji

@W1seguyw1seguy @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid Yep! Three modernas. They're great.

@W1seguyw1seguy@macrodosis@elonmusk@DrEliDavid是的！三个摩德纳。他们很棒。

@ButtonGamble @macrodosis @elonmusk @DrEliDavid What am I?

@ButtonGamble@macrodosis@elonmusk@DrEliDavid我是什么？

@notctoph @elonmusk @DrEliDavid https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@notctoph@elonmusk@DrEliDavidhttps://twitter.com/VitalikBut...