Update from Balvi! (moonshot anti-covid effort funded by @ShibainuCoin @CryptoRelief_ ). We have our first round of funding recipients:

更新自Balvi！（由@shibanucoin@CryptoRelief_2;资助的登月抗新冠病毒努力）。我们有第一轮的资助对象：

@RADVACproject open-source covid vaccine R&D. Focused on trying to make vaccines:
* Easy to make worldwide, without super-fancy equipment
* Protect against infection and not just severe symptoms
* Self-administerable
* R&D out in the open
https://twitter.com/RADVACproj...

@Radvac项目开放源代码新冠病毒疫苗研发；D.专注于尝试制造疫苗：
*易于在全球范围内制造，无需超级昂贵的设备
*预防感染，而不仅仅是严重症状
*自我管理
*R&；他在户外玩得很开心
https://twitter.com/RADVACproj...

@ne0liberal I'm just happy to be seeing so many Vitaliks in the news now.
@Vitaliy_Klychko @vitalij_kim

@我很高兴现在在新闻中看到这么多维塔利克。
@Vitaliy_Klychko@vitalij_kim

@RyanSAdams Needs to get under $0.05 to be truly acceptable imo. But we're definitely making great progress, and even proto-danksharding may be enough to get us there for a while!

@RyanSAdams需要不到0.05美元才能被imo真正接受。但我们确实取得了巨大的进步，即使是原始丹莎丁也足以让我们在那里待一段时间！

@RichardHanania Also, has Yoram Hazony-style intellectualized nationalism gone anywhere? I remember it being popular at the natcon conferences a while back but from afar it feels like that stuff just failed to find product market fit and sputtered?

@理查德哈纳尼亚还有，约拉姆·哈佐尼式的知识化民族主义到哪里去了？我记得不久前，它在natcon会议上很受欢迎，但从远处看，它感觉好像没有找到适合产品市场的东西，然后就乱七八糟了？

@hudsonjameson 2000 feet too short imo; can run that in less time than it takes for a single song to finish. Make it 20k, meters, and add an orc every km that you have to fight past, *now* we're talking.

@哈德逊-詹姆逊2000英尺（约合1米）在我看来太短；可以在比一首歌完成所需时间更短的时间内完成。让它达到20k米，每公里增加一个兽人，你必须战斗过去，*现在*我们在讨论。

@MacaesBruno Not an Asian country either though. Covid policy made that abundantly clear imo.

@不过，马凯斯布鲁诺也不是一个亚洲国家。新冠病毒政策非常清楚地表明了这一点。

@songadaymann @nicksdjohnson I'd say it's even weirder!
Basically, our culture has multiple Establishments, each of which dominate in some power spheres and are weak in others. Human psychology means that we focus on what we lack, and so everyone feels like they're David and the other side is Goliath.

@songadaymann@nicksdjohnson我觉得这更奇怪！
基本上，我们的文化有多个机构，每个机构在某些权力领域占主导地位，而在其他领域则很薄弱。人类心理学意味着我们专注于我们缺乏的东西，所以每个人都觉得他们是大卫，而另一边是歌利亚。

@ercwl @zengjiajun_eth Not the same logic at all. In one case, demand goes up to match supply because there is a race, in the other it does not.
Kinda like why better tech makes cars consume less energy, but not PoW miners.

@ercwl@zengjiajun_的逻辑完全不同。在一种情况下，需求上升以匹配供应，因为存在竞争，而在另一种情况下则没有。
有点像为什么更好的技术可以让汽车消耗更少的能源，而不是战俘矿工。

@MacaesBruno Look forward to the piece!

@麦克埃斯布鲁诺期待这首曲子！

@MacaesBruno Sure but as Poland shows, independent national-level responses can be quick-acting and awesome.
So I feel like it's complicated and there's good and bad national and good and bad transnational responses (eg. anything transnational *and* vetocratic seems useless here)

@马凯斯布鲁诺：当然，但正如波兰所表明的那样，国家层面的独立应对措施可以快速有效，令人惊叹。
所以我觉得这很复杂，有好的，有坏的，有好的，有坏的，有好的，有坏的，跨国的反应（例如，任何跨国的，*和*vetocratic在这里似乎都没用）

@MacaesBruno Can you elaborate? I'm seeing lots of trans-national solidarity flourishing *in the absence of* political structures trying to force it to happen.

@麦克埃斯布鲁诺你能详细说明一下吗？我看到，在缺乏政治结构的情况下，许多跨民族团结正在蓬勃发展，试图迫使它发生。

@zengjiajun_eth The only solution is to understand and appreciate economics.
I even wrote about this!
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@唯一的解决办法就是理解和欣赏经济学。
我甚至写过！
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@zengjiajun_eth Don't think optimizing the contract would help. Regardless of contract details, tx fee goes up until list price + tx fee = market price. If gas usage per purchase decreased 2x, the equilibrium gas price would have just been >12000 gwei instead of 6000.

@曾家俊不认为优化合同会有所帮助。无论合同细节如何，发送费用都会上涨，直到标价+发送费用=市场价格。如果每次购买的天然气使用量减少2倍，则平衡天然气价格将为>；12000 gwei而不是6000 gwei。

@mtaibbi Ahistorical too, considering how many of the most important free speech precedents were created in quite modern times when lots of mass publication infrastructure was already available.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@考虑到有多少最重要的言论自由先例是在相当现代的时候创造的，当时已经有大量的大规模出版基础设施可用，姆塔比也不符合历史。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@zengjiajun_eth Bitcoin, not crypto.
Like:
A: "Oh I'm really into bitcoins, I love all the decentralized governance and DAOs happening there"
B: "Which bitcoin is your favorite?"
A: "Oh I like Solana, also Tezos, the founder is a good guy, French, believes in anarchocapitalist stuff"

@曾家俊是比特币，而不是加密。
比如：
答：“哦，我真的很喜欢比特币，我喜欢那里发生的所有分散式治理和DAO。”
B：“你最喜欢哪种比特币？”
答：“哦，我喜欢索拉纳，也是泰佐斯，创始人是个好人，法国人，相信无政府资本主义的东西。”

@glenweyl https://www.econlib.org/archiv...
To a whole bunch of people, kings and DAOs are both means to an end, where the end is making leftists go away.

@格伦威尔https://www.econlib.org/archiv...
对一大群人来说，国王和道士都是达到目的的手段，目的是让左派离开。

Not sure why so many people are reading into this tweet the subtext that I'm anti-Elon. I'm not!

不知道为什么这么多人在这条推文中读到了我反对埃隆的潜台词。我不是！

The largest consequence of Elon taking over Twitter may well be not any specific policy decision he makes, but rather the morale effect of his supporters feeling emboldened and his detractors feeling like they are arguing on enemy territory. This is happening already.

埃隆接管推特的最大后果很可能不是他做出的任何具体政策决定，而是他的支持者感到胆大包天，而他的诽谤者感到他们在敌方领土上争论，从而产生了士气效应。这已经发生了。

@mnolangray "Ideas are a dime a dozen, execution is everything" may well be the single piece of "unquestioned common wisdom" I disagree with the most. It's just so not true.

@姆诺朗格雷的“想法是一毛钱一打，执行就是一切”很可能是我最不同意的“毫无疑问的共同智慧”中的一部分。这完全不是真的。