The "but that Saudi guy already owns 5%" point is well taken but ultimately weak imo. Control is superlinear in ownership stake. His level of ability to control policy is very low now, and would increase by *far* more than 10x if his ownership increased to 50%.

“但那个沙特人已经拥有5%的股份”这一点被很好地理解了，但在国际海事组织看来，控制力最终很弱。在所有权股份方面，控制力是超线性的。他现在控制政策的能力非常低，如果他的所有权增加到50%，那么他的控制能力将增加10倍以上。

@akarlin0 Honestly even a 60 second edit button would get you a lot of the gains.
(Or just make it permanently visible what part of a tweet was edited and on-mouseover show what was there before)

@akarlin0老实说，即使是一个60秒的编辑按钮也会让你们获得很多好处。
（或者只是让它永久可见推文的哪一部分被编辑，并在鼠标上方显示之前的内容）

@robinhanson I personally consider twitter to be a public utility, but where there are lots of very good reasons why that "public" should not be represented by any specific government. Hence the challenge...

罗宾汉：我个人认为推特是一个公共事业，但在那里有很多很好的理由说明为什么“公共”不应该被任何特定的政府所代表。这就是挑战。。。

@aggiebitcoin The problem is particularly bad in the social media case because media platforms combine very high levels of influence with often low monetizability (and so low market cap -> cheap to acquire)

@aggiebitcoin在社交媒体领域，这个问题尤其严重，因为媒体平台的影响力非常高，但通常货币化程度较低（因此市值较低，收购成本较低）

Don't oppose Elon running twitter (at least compared to status quo), but I do disagree with the more generalized enthusiasm for wealthy people/orgs hostile-takeovering social media firms. That could easily go *very* wrong (eg. imagine an ethically-challenged foreign gov doing it) https://twitter.com/robinhanso...

不要反对埃隆（Elon）运营twitter（至少与现状相比），但我不同意更普遍的对富人/组织敌意收购社交媒体公司的热情。这很容易出错（例如，想象一个道德受到挑战的外国政府这样做）https://twitter.com/robinhanso...

@AnthonyLeeZhang The best technique I've come up with is to add a separate cabinet of representatives that can only be changed at a limited rate (eg. 5% per week), giving people who oppose the takeover timw to regroup and fork the project.

@我想出的最好的办法是增加一个单独的代表内阁，只能以有限的比率（例如每周5%）进行更换，让反对收购timw的人重新组织并参与该项目。

@AnthonyLeeZhang You'd have to connect it to a Kleros oracle asking "is a takeover happening?". But the problem even there is, at sufficiently large scales an attacker could also just do a takeover of Kleros...

@AnthonyLeeZhang你必须把它连接到一个Kleros甲骨文上，询问“是否发生了收购？”。但问题是，在足够大的规模下，攻击者也可以接管Kleros。。。

@Noahpinion This is like me and my 5+ really long posts explaining why coin voting governance is bad 🤣😭

@Noahpinion这就像我和我的5+篇很长的帖子一样，解释了投币式治理为何不好🤣😭

In case people are wondering, public transit + walk is not allowed:
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

如果人们想知道，公共交通+步行是不允许的：
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@A7om20 @Coveted No, must be a pure walk from some reasonable location in the city that regular people go for non-airport-related reasons all the way to the airport.

@A7om20@令人垂涎的不，一定是从城市中某个合理的位置步行到机场，普通人会因为与机场无关的原因一路走到机场。

@epolynya @Coveted Eventually I should probably write a post about this...
A big part of the answer is Uniqlo maximalism, but there's many other tricks too.

@epolynya@Covented最终我可能应该写一篇关于这个的帖子。。。
很大一部分答案是优衣库的最大化，但还有许多其他技巧。

@C_Harwick Las Vegas is one of my five!
And yes, you're right that you have to take some irregular paths to get out on foot.

@C_Harwick拉斯维加斯是我的五个城市之一！
是的，你是对的，你必须走一些不规则的路才能步行出去。

@Nittyb_xyz Most recent time was, I was in Singapore doing a 20km run, and the run (along ECP) ended at a place beside the airport, so I walked into the jewel at the airport to get an acai bowl.

@Nittyb_xyz最近的一次是，我在新加坡做了一次20公里的跑步，跑步（沿着ECP）在机场旁边的一个地方结束，所以我走进机场的珠宝店去拿一个acai碗。

@Coveted My five:
Toronto, Las Vegas, San Jose, Berlin (Tegel), Singapore

@觊觎我的五个：
多伦多、拉斯维加斯、圣何塞、柏林（Tegel）、新加坡

In how many cities have you walked to or from the airport?

你在多少城市步行去机场或从机场出来？

@AnthonyLeeZhang @wdiamond_econ @glenweyl @tylercowen has anyone else suggested the above as a way of making resource-curse states more incentive-aligned? Feels like yet another one of those "I reinvented something that's already in a paper from 1962" things. Or are there big flaws with it?

@AnthonyLeeZhang@wdiamond_econ@glenweyl@tylercowen还有其他人提出上述建议，作为让资源诅咒国家更加激励一致的一种方式吗？感觉像是又一个“我重新发明了1962年的一篇论文中的东西”的东西。还是它有很大的缺陷？

@AnthonyLeeZhang @wdiamond_econ I agree! And if there are factors of production whose value does not depend on the society prospering (oil?), then maybe best to have a constitutional rule that it goes straight into a UBI so political elites only get paid out of taxes that depend on the society doing well.

@AnthonyLeeZhang@wdiamond_econ我同意！如果有生产要素的价值不取决于社会的繁荣（石油？），那么，也许最好有一个宪法规定，它直接进入全民基本收入，这样政治精英只能从依赖社会运转良好的税收中获得报酬。

@AnthonyLeeZhang @wdiamond_econ Yeah I actually totally agree in the HK case (and in general, that the profit-maximizing quantity for the monopolist [here, local gov that controls zoning] is not the socially optimal quantity)

@AnthonyLeeZhang@wdiamond_econ是的，我实际上完全同意香港的情况（一般来说，垄断者（这里是控制分区的地方政府）利润最大化的数量不是社会最佳数量）

@AnthonyLeeZhang @wdiamond_econ Is it true that SF maximizes land value? It maximizes value per cubic meter, but not clear that it maximizes value per square meter. Seems totally plausible that total land value would be much higher if SF population density increased to closer to Hong Kong levels.

@AnthonyLeeZhang@wdiamond_econ SF实现土地价值最大化是真的吗？它使每立方米的价值最大化，但不清楚它是否使每平方米的价值最大化。如果SF人口密度增加到接近香港的水平，那么总的土地价值会更高，这似乎是完全合理的。

@AnthonyLeeZhang One possible argument is limits to political stability: even one very incompetent and/or reckless administration can destroy an SWF forever, whereas the right to keep extracting medium-level land taxes is de-facto inalienable.

@一个可能的论点是限制政治稳定：即使是一个非常无能和/或鲁莽的政府也可能永远摧毁主权财富基金，而继续征收中等水平土地税的权利实际上是不可剥夺的。