@AutismCapital Ooh I actually managed to trigger the autism capital account?
Troll successful already 😊
I'll keep observing the fallout and let the internet reply guys give me free education on what specifically about the WEF they dislike. Feel free to join in!
@AutismCapital噢，我真的设法触发了自闭症资本账户？
Troll已成功😊
我会继续观察后果，让互联网回复者免费教育我他们不喜欢WEF的具体内容。欢迎加入！
Is anyone else getting the feeling that the Rothschilds meme has run out of steam, and so now vaguely insinuating things about the WEF is the new current thing coming in to replace it? https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
Are "the Rothschilds" actually remotely as powerful and coordinated as the conspiracy theorists seem to believe, or are they just a group of old-money socialites and all that other stuff is overhyped?
Help me learn and decide! https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...
还有谁会觉得罗斯柴尔德的迷因已经没有了动力，所以现在对世界经济论坛含糊其辞的影射是取而代之的新事物吗？https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
“罗斯柴尔德家族”是否真的像阴谋论者所认为的那样强大和协调，或者他们只是一群有钱的社交名流，而其他所有的东西都被夸大了？
帮助我学习和决定！https://www.reddit.com/r/ether...
RT: EF Data Availability Sampling (DAS) RFP just released
https://github.com/ethereum/re...
DAS is a hard but critical problem to solve in order to take us from EIP 4844 to our fully scalable future.
$1.5M in funding earmarked for proposals!
We're happy to chat to help get you up to speed
转发：EF数据可用性采样（DAS）RFP刚刚发布
https://github.com/ethereum/re...
为了将我们从EIP 4844带到完全可扩展的未来，DAS是一个很难解决但至关重要的问题。
150万美元专项资金用于提案！
我们很高兴与您聊天，帮助您了解最新情况
RT: 1. 👋 hey anon - you should be hyped about the Ethereum Staking CLR round, and you should contribute to it!
- $350K in matching funds
- 1288 donors so far
- Demos tech that will help scale CLRs to millions of users
- 6 days left
https://qf.ethstaker.cc/
RT：1。👋 嘿，安恩，你应该为以太坊的CLR回合大肆宣传，你应该为此做出贡献！
-35万美元配套资金
-迄今已有1288个捐助者
-演示有助于将CLR扩展到数百万用户的技术
-还剩6天
https://qf.ethstaker.cc/
The @prylabs team honestly deserves a lot of praise for taking a year-long "don't use Prysm" campaign on the chin and not opposing or getting publicly upset by it.
Anyway, that battle is basically won now; time to switch focus to getting more diversity in execution clients. https://t.co/djo8f9awz9
@prylabs团队真的应该得到很多赞扬，因为他们在下巴上进行了一年的“不要使用Prysm”运动，没有反对或公开为此感到不安。
无论如何，这场战斗现在基本上已经胜利了；是时候将重点转向在执行客户机中获得更多的多样性了。https://t.co/djo8f9awz9
@danfinlay Actually not just MM! I use a bunch of wallets, and many have had the same problem.
> invite you to review some user research
Why not just publish it! I'm sure many people other than myself would benefit
@danfinlay其实不仅仅是MM！我用了很多钱包，很多钱包都有同样的问题。
>；邀请您回顾一些用户研究
为什么不直接发表呢！我相信除了我之外，还有很多人会受益
@adam3us In general, Bitcoin people would do well by better appreciating that Bitcoin too is ultimately a human-designed social system.
@总体而言，比特币人如果能更好地认识到比特币最终也是人类设计的社会系统，就会做得更好。
@adam3us > reject the master architect hypothesis
> Satoshi's protocol is perfect, 21 million cap should not be changed, protocol should only be changed through soft forks, and even then only if "technical experts" are cool with it
@adam3us>；拒绝大师建筑师假设
>；Satoshi的协议是完美的，2100万上限不应该改变，协议只应该通过软叉子来改变，即使是这样，也只有在“技术专家”对此保持冷静的情况下
@Bruno_Nardi @bryan_caplan The open borders thing is a good example. Economists and many other elites tend to favor something closer to it (though rarely go all the way), whereas populists tend to favor locking people out of the places they can be most happy and productive by strict government force.
@Bruno_Nardi@bryan_caplan开放边境就是一个很好的例子。经济学家和许多其他精英倾向于支持更接近它的东西（尽管很少全力以赴），而民粹主义者倾向于将人们锁在严格的政府力量可以让他们最快乐、最高效的地方。
@Bruno_Nardi On many specific issues, intellectual elites are actually more pro-freedom than most others.
@bryan_caplan has some good stats on this. Recommend reading The Myth of the Rational Voter.
@Bruno_Nardi在许多具体问题上，知识精英实际上比其他大多数人更支持自由。
@布莱恩·卡普兰对此有一些很好的统计数据。理性阅读的神话。
Contradiction between my desire to be a positive-sum mediator figure that can be everyone's friend and my desire to stand strongly with good against evil those times when true evil is what we face.
我想成为一个能成为每个人朋友的正和调解人的愿望，以及在我们面对真正邪恶的时候，我想坚定地站在正义与邪恶之间的矛盾。
Contradiction between my desire to see more diversity in interesting *cultures* and my realization that maintaining a culture that's distinct from the mainstream seems to often require *some* kind of insanity or artificial barrier or similar thing that I ideologically dislike.
我渴望在有趣的文化中看到更多的多样性，而我意识到要保持一种不同于主流的文化似乎常常需要某种疯狂、人为的障碍或类似的东西，而我在意识形态上不喜欢这些东西，这两者之间存在矛盾。
Contradiction between my dislike of many modern financial blockchain "applications" ($3M monkeys etc), and my grudging appreciation for the fact that that stuff is a big part of what keeps the crypto economy running and pays for all my favorite cool DAO/governance experiments.
我不喜欢许多现代金融区块链“应用程序”（300万美元猴子等），我不情愿地欣赏这样一个事实，即这些东西是密码经济运行的重要组成部分，为我最喜欢的酷DAO/治理实验买单。
Contradiction between my desire for crypto to grow beyond finance and my realization that finance (incl payments+SoV) is still by far the most successful category of crypto apps, *especially* among third-world residents, human rights activists and vulnerable people generally.
我对加密技术超越金融领域的渴望与我意识到金融（包括支付+SoV）仍然是迄今为止最成功的加密应用类别之间的矛盾，尤其是在第三世界居民、人权活动人士和弱势群体中。
Contradiction between my desire to maximally simplify the L1 and my desire to maximally simplify the whole ecosystem (as a simple L1 often "exports" its complexity to higher layers of the stack that users have to adopt anyway)
我希望最大限度地简化L1和我希望最大限度地简化整个生态系统之间的矛盾（因为简单的L1通常会将其复杂性“导出”到堆栈的更高层，用户无论如何都必须采用）
Contradiction between my preference for reducing reliance on individuals and trying to build fixed systems that can stand the test of time and my appreciation of "live players" and their role in helping the world move forward.
我倾向于减少对个人的依赖，试图建立能够经受时间考验的固定体系，而我对“活玩家”及其在帮助世界前进中的作用的欣赏，两者之间存在矛盾。
Contradiction between my desire to see Ethereum become an L1 that can survive truly extreme circumstances and my realization that many key apps on Ethereum already rely on far more fragile security assumptions than anything we consider acceptable in Ethereum protocol design.
我希望看到以太坊成为能够在真正极端环境下生存的L1，但我意识到以太坊上的许多关键应用已经依赖于比我们认为在以太坊协议设计中可以接受的任何安全假设都要脆弱得多的安全假设，这两者之间存在矛盾。
Contradiction between my love for things like decentralization and democracy, and my realization that in practice I agree with intellectual elites more than "the people" on many (though definitely far from all) specific policy issues.
我对权力下放和民主的热爱，以及我意识到在实践中，我在许多（尽管绝对不是所有）具体政策问题上更认同知识精英而非“人民”之间的矛盾。
Contradiction between my desire to see more countries adopting radical policy experiments (eg. crypto countries!) and my realization that the governments most likely to go all the way on such things are more likely to be centralized and not friendly to diversity internally.
我希望看到更多国家采用激进政策试验（例如加密国家！）的愿望之间的矛盾我意识到，最有可能在这类事情上一意孤行的政府更有可能是中央集权的，对内部的多样性不友好。
Thread: some still open contradictions in my thoughts and my values, that I have been thinking about but still don't feel like I've fully resolved.
线索：我的思想和价值观中仍然存在一些公开的矛盾，我一直在思考这些矛盾，但仍然感觉不到我已经完全解决了。