用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息

@gotojedi @dankrad @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy But do we need the bulk of the population to be involved to get that outcome?
Like, I feel like our civilization today is very capable of appreciating the beauty of Mandelbrot sets, but >90% of the population probably thinks that's a type of pastry.

@gotojedi@dankrad@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy但我们是否需要大部分人口参与才能取得这一结果?
比如,我觉得我们今天的文明非常有能力欣赏曼德尔布罗特布景的美,但是>;90%的人可能认为这是一种糕点。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@0x81B @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Are there still paper forms? I thought everything got wechat-mini-programified over the last two years?
(I actually don't know, I was last in China in Jan 2020 and have not since been back for obvious reasons)

@0x81B@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy还有纸质表格吗?我以为在过去的两年里,所有的东西都被微信程序化了?
(实际上我不知道,我最后一次来中国是在2020年1月,后来由于明显的原因没有回来)

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@m_j_rossman @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Oh I actually think the idea of languages where the writer's UI and the reader's UI are different, which requires computers to be possible, is fascinating.

@m\U j\u rossman@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy噢,我实际上认为,作者的UI和读者的UI不同的语言的想法很吸引人,这要求计算机成为可能。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@RobMcNealy @AnthonyLeeZhang I think this question is actually different from the cursive debate, because:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@dankrad @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy But my own experience suggests the exact opposite! My knowledge of them is completely one-way

发表时间:4年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@RobMcNealy@AnthonyLeeZhang我认为这个问题实际上不同于草书辩论,因为:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@dankrad@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy,但我自己的经验表明恰恰相反!我对它们的了解完全是单向的

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@dankrad @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy But my own experience suggests the exact opposite! My knowledge of them is completely one-way

@dankrad@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy,但我自己的经验表明恰恰相反!我对它们的了解完全是单向的

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Question for you: would you dispute my intuition that it seems like there's basically no reason for anyone to learn to write chinese characters by hand at this point?

@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy问你一个问题:你会质疑我的直觉吗?我的直觉是,现在似乎根本没有理由让任何人学习手写汉字?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@zmanian @sreeramkannan @least_nathan @tarunchitra @hosseeb Yeah I agree, but I do think it's possible for an app ecosystem to "accidentally" move toward >100x security leverage for other reasons as well, and it will happen many times in the future.

@zmanian@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@Taruncitra@hosseeb是的,我同意,但我确实认为应用生态系统有可能“意外”走向>;由于其他原因,安全利用率达到100倍,而且这种情况在未来还会发生很多次。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gugukhumalo198 @AnthonyLeeZhang 区块链和游戏有一个共享的历史,也有一个共享的未来。

@gugukhumalo198 @AnthonyLeeZhang 区块链和游戏有一个共享的历史,也有一个共享的未来。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@sreeramkannan @least_nathan @zmanian @tarunchitra @hosseeb (Of course, in an ecosystem with cross-chain asset holdings [not the same as cross-chain atomic swaps!], "recovery" requires all chains to coordinate a governance intervention, which is why I'm against cross-chain asset holdings!)
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

My argument for why the future will be *multi-chain*, but it will not be *cross-chain*: there are fundamental limits to the security of bridges that hop across multiple "zones of sovereignty". From https://old.reddit.com/r/ether...: https://t.co/tEYz8vb59b

发表时间:4年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@zmanian@Taruncitra@hosseeb(当然,在一个拥有跨链资产的生态系统中[与跨链原子掉期不同!],“恢复”要求所有链协调治理干预,这就是为什么我反对跨链资产持有!)
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

我的论点是,为什么未来将是“多链”,而不是“跨链”:跨越多个“主权区”的桥梁的安全性受到根本限制。从…起https://old.reddit.com/r/ether...:https://t.co/tEYz8vb59b

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@sreeramkannan @least_nathan @zmanian @tarunchitra @hosseeb Requiring TVL < STK/3 for security is really restrictive!
This is why I think it's really important for chains to not just protect against 51% attacks, but also be able to recover from them.

@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@zmanian@Taruncitra@hosseeb需要TVL<;STK/3的安全性非常严格!
这就是为什么我认为链条不仅要防止51%的攻击,而且要能够从中恢复,这一点非常重要。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AnthonyLeeZhang Video games are imo delegitimized much more than they deserve to be.

@AnthonyLeeZhang视频游戏在我看来被取消合法化的程度远远超过了它们应有的程度。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@econoar Oh I agree! To be clear when I criticize defi I'm criticizing either (i) bad defi or (ii) excessive optimization in defi to the point where you're squeezing out tiny percentage gains but forgetting to make the simpler and dumber stuff more resilient and accessible

@哦,我同意!要清楚的是,当我批评defi时,我是在批评(I)糟糕的defi或(ii)过度优化defi,以至于你挤出了微小的百分比收益,但忘记了让更简单、更愚蠢的东西更具弹性和可访问性

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

How do we create a culture where it's harder to set (or become) the topic of public conversation by doing something terrible and easier to do so by doing something great?

我们如何创造一种文化,在这种文化中,做一些糟糕的事情更难成为公众谈话的话题,做一些伟大的事情更容易成为公众谈话的话题?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Crowd33 @tjayrush Really? I thought it was crucial in keeping WoW fun.

@Crowd33@tjayrush真的吗?我认为这对保持魔兽世界的乐趣至关重要。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@tjayrush Can't they do this already?
(government agencies maintaining opaque shadowy records of who's been acting in ways they don't like, that is)
Feels like SBTs would be a step backwards for them, as the target immediately knows they're being watched.

@tjayrush他们不能已经这么做了吗?
(也就是说,政府机构对谁以他们不喜欢的方式行事保持不透明的模糊记录)
感觉SBT对他们来说是一种倒退,因为目标立即知道他们正在被监视。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr Does progress studies actually have that much of an accumulation-centric frame? I see some accumulation focus, but also a lot of "we need to cut the red tape".

@vgr进展研究真的有那么多以积累为中心的框架吗?我看到一些积累的重点,但也有很多“我们需要削减繁文缛节”。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AbuSpinky @ne0liberal @elonmusk @JeffBezos Oh I've been banned from a chat for being a fake at least once.

@AbuSpinky@ne0liberal@elonmusk@JeffBezos噢,我被禁止聊天,因为我至少有一次是假的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ne0liberal Maybe @elonmusk and @JeffBezos should pop into some discord chats more!

@ne0liberal也许@elonmusk和@JeffBezos应该多加入一些不和谐的聊天!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ne0liberal (btw btw I'm not a billionaire anymore)

@ne0liberal(顺便说一句,我不再是亿万富翁了)

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ne0liberal What happened to "talking directly to the people" being a virtue?
(btw I particularly appreciate that Elon and Jeff actually respond to people, and don't just shout their own stuff)

@“直接与人民对话”是一种美德,这是怎么回事?
(顺便说一句,我特别赞赏埃隆和杰夫实际上是在回应人们,而不仅仅是大喊自己的东西)

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情