用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息
@slf_svrgn @purphat @koeppelmann In this case, client teams have been scrambling to understand the situation so they can figure out what to fix for the last couple of hours! Already some good hypotheses:
https://twitter.com/preston_va...
@koeppelmann We suspect this is caused by the implementation of Proposer Boost fork choice has not fully rolled out to the network. This reorg is not an indicator of a flawed fork choice, but a non-trivial segmentation of updated vs out of date client software.
发表时间：4年前 作者：prestonvanloon.eth @preston_vanloon@slf\U svrgn@purphat@koeppelmann在这种情况下，客户团队一直在争先恐后地了解情况，以便他们能够找出过去几个小时要解决的问题！已经有一些好的假设：
https://twitter.com/preston_va...
@koeppelmann我们怀疑这是由于提案人Boost fork choice的实施尚未完全推广到网络。这个reorg并不是一个有缺陷的fork选择的指标，而是对更新的和过时的客户端软件的一个非常重要的细分。
@koeppelmann Please don't regret it. Truth-seeking is more important than "not giving the wrong people rhetorical ammunition" or whatever.
@koeppelmann请不要后悔。求真比“不给错误的人修辞弹药”或其他什么更重要。
@danrobinson TIL that the quite elementary calculus theorem I think we all use a huge amount without even realizing it is also named.... Fermat's theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
@danrobinson直到我认为我们都使用了大量的微积分定理，甚至没有意识到它也被命名为。。。。费马定理
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
For anyone interested in the "current thing" discourse, the @bryan_caplan vs @slatestarcodex debate on "arbitrary deploring" from 2017-18 is fascinating:
Caplan: https://www.econlib.org/archiv...
SSC: https://slatestarcodex.com/201...
Caplan: https://www.econlib.org/the-il...
对于任何对“时事”话题感兴趣的人来说，@bryan\u caplan vs@slatestarcodex关于2017-18年“任意谴责”的辩论都很吸引人：
卡普兰：https://www.econlib.org/archiv...
SSC：https://slatestarcodex.com/201...
卡普兰：https://www.econlib.org/the-il...
RT: We did more work on efficiently verifying EIP-4844 transactions and blocks! This time we speed it up by verifying aggregated KZG commitments using random linear combinations. Here is code and how it works: https://github.com/ethereum/EI...
#EIP4844
RT：我们在有效验证EIP-4844事务和块方面做了更多的工作！这次我们通过使用随机线性组合验证聚合的KZG承诺来加快速度。下面是代码及其工作原理：https://github.com/ethereum/EI...
#EIP4844
@GianlucaDemarc9 This is in a finite field, there is no tending to zero.
@GianlucaDemarc9这是在有限域中，没有趋于零的趋势。
@BinanceMoon_ @overhtmoon520 @NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov Not sure what remarks you mean. But in general I am hopeful that the Russian war in Ukraine will convince everyone that invading people is a really bad idea and a risk not worth the reward and we can have peace for at least another half century.
@BinanceMoon\uU@overhtmoon520@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@willmacaskill@moskov不知道你的话是什么意思。但总的来说，我希望俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争能够让所有人相信，入侵人民是一个非常糟糕的主意，是一个不值得付出代价的风险，我们可以在至少半个世纪内实现和平。
@overhtmoon520 @NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov Wealthy people having huge numbers of children is good for wealth de-concentration (assuming inheritance is shared fairly etc)
Main argument against is that it might distract them from their work, which in some cases makes a far bigger impact on the world.
@overhtmoon520@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@Willmacakill@moskov有大量子女的富人有利于财富分散（假设遗产公平分享等）
反对的主要理由是，这可能会分散他们的注意力，在某些情况下，这会对世界产生更大的影响。
@terrelljstarr Many people seem to have a strong aversion to two groups with weapons fighting each other, but no aversion to one group with weapons brutalizing another group without weapons that cannot fight back.
Ceasefire will not stop what's happening to civilians in Kherson and Mariupol.
@terrelljstarr许多人似乎非常厌恶两个拥有武器的团体相互争斗，但并不厌恶一个拥有武器的团体残暴对待另一个没有武器却无法反击的团体。
停火不会阻止赫尔松和马里乌波尔平民所遭受的一切。
@overhtmoon520 @NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov > We need to look at this view dialectically. Without more people, there will be no more new technologies.
Fully agree with this. Also my main argument against anti-population environmentalism.
@overhtmoon520@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@Willmacakill@moskov>；我们需要辩证地看待这一观点。没有更多的人，就不会有更多的新技术。
完全同意这一点。也是我反对反人口环保主义的主要论点。
@NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov Good idea, done!
@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@willmacaskill@moskov好主意，完成了！
@overhtmoon520 @NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov The reason for this is that taking care of 2*n children takes less than twice the effort of taking care of n children.
They can share resources, entertain each other, etc.
(I have two sisters ~15y younger than myself so this comes in part from personal experience)
@overhtmoon520@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@Willmacakill@moskov之所以如此，是因为照顾2*n个孩子所需的工作量不到照顾n个孩子的两倍。
他们可以共享资源、相互娱乐等。
（我有两个妹妹，比我小15岁左右，这部分是因为我的亲身经历）
@overhtmoon520 @NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov My main "weird opinion" on this topic is that I think we should get away from this mindset that in an ideal world everyone would have ~2 children. Maybe it's better if some families have 5 kids and others have 0.
(of course tax subsidies for the 5-kid family are a good idea)
@overhtmoon520@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@willmacaskill@moskov我对这个话题的主要“奇怪观点”是，我认为我们应该摆脱这种心态，在理想的世界中，每个人都会有2个孩子。如果一些家庭有5个孩子，而另一些家庭有0个孩子，可能会更好。
（当然，为5个孩子的家庭提供税收补贴是个好主意）
@NathanpmYoung @ESYudkowsky @slatestarcodex @eigenrobot @s8mb @robertwiblin @willmacaskill @moskov wait wait you made jokes about me?
Can you link some, I feel like I'm missing great content
@NathanpmYoung@ESYudkowsky@slatestarcodex@eigenrobot@s8mb@robertwiblin@willmacaskill@moskov等等你拿我开玩笑了？
你能链接一些吗，我觉得我错过了一些很棒的内容
Quick math explanation:
This is a blinded proof of membership. We want to prove `P(z) = y` without revealing `z` (but `y` is public). Normally, a proof is `Q = (P - y) / (X - z)`. Here, we instead do `Q = (P - y) / (rX - rz)` to blind `z`.
And prove that `z` is a root of unity. https://twitter.com/IACR_News/... https://t.co/H91JYbA60c
#ePrint Caulk: Lookup Arguments in Sublinear Time: A Zapico, V Buterin, D Khovratovich, M Maller, A Nitulescu, M Simkin https://ia.cr/2022/621
发表时间：4年前 作者：IACR @IACR_News快速数学解释：
这是一份盲目的会员证明。我们想证明'P（z）=y'，但不透露'z'（但'y'是公开的）。通常，证明是` Q=（P-y）/（X-z）`。在这里，我们用Q=（P-y）/（rX-rz）`来盲取z。
证明“z”是统一的根。https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...https://t.co/H91JYbA60c
#ePrint Caulk：次线性时间中的查找参数：A Zapico、V Buterin、D Khovratovich、M Maller、A Nitulescu、M Simkinhttps://ia.cr/2022/621
RT: Caulk is out! Caulk achieves zero-knowledge lookups and membership proofs up to 100x faster than Poseidon Merkle trees. Joint work with Mary Maller, @VitalikButerin, @Khovr, @13portocale and @CryptoSimkin 👇🏽 https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...
RT：填缝料出来了！Caulk实现了零知识查找和成员资格证明，比Poseidon Merkle树快100倍。与Mary Maller、VitalikButerin、Khovr、13portocale和CryptoSimkin合作👇🏽 https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...
@hudsonjameson 2000 feet too short imo; can run that in less time than it takes for a single song to finish. Make it 20k, meters, and add an orc every km that you have to fight past, *now* we're talking.
发表时间：4年前 作者：vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin与TSZLhttps://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@哈德逊·詹姆逊（hudsonjameson）国际海事组织（imo）2000英尺太短；可以在比完成一首歌所需的时间更短的时间内完成。让它达到20k，米，每公里增加一个兽人，你必须战斗过去，*现在*我们在讨论。
@AndrewYang Any intetest in quadratic voting or quadratic funding?
https://vitalik.ca/general/201...
@AndrewYang在二次投票或二次融资方面有什么创新吗？
https://vitalik.ca/general/201...
I love seeing people with .eth in their handles arguing with each other on twitter.
Diversity of opinions is fun, and it's even more fun when there's an in-your-face reminder that no matter how much you disagree on small stuff ultimately you still love the same cryptocurrency.
我喜欢看到别人和我在一起。他们在推特上互相争吵。
意见的多样性很有趣，当你的脸上有一个提醒，无论你在小事上有多大分歧，最终你仍然喜欢相同的加密货币时，这就更有趣了。