@marcusdiazeth 2A is great against human or large-animal attackers (and maybe some drones, though that's hard) but defense against viruses does require different tech imo.

@marcusdiazeth 2A对人类或大型动物袭击者（可能还有一些无人机，虽然这很难）的防御效果很好，但对病毒的防御确实需要不同的技术。

In a saner world the libertarians would be as excited about this stuff as we are about fireproof metal hardware wallets. Self-sovereign local community biodefense as an alternative to centralized lockdowns and quarantines.
That world is still possible! https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...

在一个更加理智的世界里，自由主义者会对这种东西感到兴奋，就像我们对防火金属硬件钱包一样。自主的当地社区生物防御系统，作为集中封锁和隔离的替代方案。
那个世界仍然是可能的！https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...

@robinhanson @AnthonyLeeZhang Though maybe there's a market-incentives argument that the gov should auction the land off into a Haberger tax scheme, and use the proceeds to buy up 2x more land and put *that* under the same scheme, so you have 2*X hybrid property instead of X full-gov property.

@robinhanson@AnthonyLeeZhang尽管可能有一种市场激励的论点，即政府应该将土地拍卖成哈贝格税计划，并用所得购买2倍以上的土地，并将其置于同一计划之下，因此你拥有2 X混合房产，而不是X完全的政府房产。

@robinhanson @AnthonyLeeZhang I guess government-owned land isn't *really* inalienable, though cultural memes about privatization of green stuff leading to dystopia do make it more difficult than most property to alienate.

@robinhanson@AnthonyLeeZhang我想政府拥有的土地并不是“真的”不可分割的，尽管有关绿色材料私有化导致反乌托邦的文化模因确实使其比大多数财产更难转让。

@robinhanson See thread with myself and @AnthonyLeeZhang on the sell versus extract rent tradeoff:
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@robinhanson与我和AnthonyLeeZhang讨论了出售与提取租金的权衡：
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Oh yeah I totally agree there. I oppose single entities having the ability to turn stuff on and off for large groups of people.

@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital噢，是的，我完全同意这一点。我反对单个实体有能力为大群体的人打开和关闭东西。

@xalewic @JeffKirdeikis @AutismCapital The tone reads as sympathetic to the global (not just American) concerns, no?

@xalewic@JeffKirdeikis@AutismCapital这种语气读起来是同情全球（不仅仅是美国）的担忧，不是吗？

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital My point being that the World Economic Forum is a *forum*, like Bitcointalk is a forum. The point is to aggregate different perspectives, not to publish pieces that it as an organization fully stands behind.

@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital我的观点是，世界经济论坛是一个论坛，就像Bitcointalk是一个论坛一样。关键是聚合不同的观点，而不是发布it作为一个组织完全支持的内容。

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Here's a WEF piece that's clearly pro-privacy:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda... https://t.co/ULADWWexnc

@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital这里有一篇WEF文章，明确支持隐私：
https://www.weforum.org/agenda...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/ULADWWexnc

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Meanwhile here's a different WEF article that references that one, and describes the scenario in it as at least partially dystopian:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda... https://t.co/Ne7wAay0FF

@JeffKirdeikis@Xaleic@AutismCapital与此同时，WEF的另一篇文章引用了这篇文章，并将其中的场景描述为至少部分反乌托邦：
https://www.weforum.org/agenda...https://t.co/Ne7wAay0FF

@PylVander @xalewic @AutismCapital Like, to me this doesn't even read like a description of what any of them *want* to see happening. "Society split in two" is the sort of phrase that those people use to virtue-signal *against* something. https://t.co/2yKYf3wDwQ

@PylVander@xalewic@AutismCapital对我来说，这甚至不像是对他们中任何一个人*想要*看到的事情的描述。“社会一分为二”是那些人用来表示美德反对某事的短语。https://t.co/2yKYf3wDwQ

@PylVander @xalewic @AutismCapital Has WEF actually done anything to abolish private property though? So far what I've seen, including what people have linked to me in response to these tweets, is just scifi worldbuilding.

@PylVander@xalewic@AutismCapital世界经济论坛真的做了什么废除私有财产的事情吗？到目前为止，我所看到的，包括人们在这些推特上与我链接的内容，都只是科幻世界的构建。

@PylVander @xalewic @AutismCapital Oh I'm not in favor of abolishing private property at all (I support high land value taxes but that's pretty much it). I just think some physical property minimization is a good lifestyle choice for many individuals to try.

@PylVander@xalewic@AutismCapital噢，我根本不赞成废除私有财产（我支持高土地价值税，但基本上就是这样）。我只是认为一些物理属性最小化对于许多人来说是一个很好的生活方式选择。

@MiLi85966045 @xalewic @AutismCapital 这个扩展性问题彻底解决之后会认真开始吧。交易费更低之后那些非金融应用都容易多了

@MiLi85966045 @xalewic @AutismCapital 这个扩展性问题彻底解决之后会认真开始吧。交易费更低之后那些非金融应用都容易多了

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Oh I do oppose that stuff. I just am skeptical of the idea that highly coordinated conspiracies tied to entities like the WEF are what's pushing it.
(I'm sure you can find specific WEF people pushing it, but they're downstream of other stuff, not the source)

@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital噢，我确实反对那些东西。我只是对这种观点持怀疑态度，即与世界经济论坛等实体有关的高度协调的阴谋是推动这一进程的原因。
（我相信你可以找到推动它的特定WEF人员，但他们是其他东西的下游，而不是来源）

@xalewic @AutismCapital I just love confusing people who expect me to be in an identifiable camp 🧡😊💚

@xalewic@AutismCapital我只是喜欢让那些希望我在一个可识别的阵营里的人感到困惑🧡😊💚

@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Stonks, REITs, crypto?
I said physical possessions!

@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital Stonks，房地产投资信托公司，加密？
我说的是物质财产！

@Meteroit1 @AutismCapital Oh yeah I fully agree there.

@Meteroit1@AutismCapital噢，是的，我完全同意。

@xalewic @AutismCapital And physical possessions bog you down and reduce freedom, so the case for minimizing them seems clear too (though I'm open to the idea that there are counterbalancing cases)

@xalewic@AutismCapital和物质财富会让你陷入困境，减少自由，因此最小化它们的理由似乎也很清楚（尽管我同意存在制衡的情况）

@xalewic @AutismCapital I do find bugs icky, though I feel like the ick factor can be removed by turning them into powder, and at that point they're a good cheap resilient source of protein and worth at least experimenting with, no?

@xalewic@AutismCapital我确实觉得虫子很恶心，尽管我觉得把它们变成粉末可以消除ick因素，而且在这一点上，它们是一种很好的廉价弹性蛋白质来源，至少值得尝试一下，不是吗？