@llllvvuu @MikeSylphDapps @evan_van_ness @glenweyl @pujaohlhaver SBTs don't have to be revocable. I think the intent of the piece is that revocation / edit-by-issuer is *sometimes* a useful functionality, but you can still do lots of really cool stuff without it.
@llllvvuu@Mikesylphdaps@evan_van_ness@glenweyl@pujaohlhaver SBT不必是可撤销的。我认为这篇文章的目的是，发行人撤销/编辑有时是一个有用的功能，但没有它，你仍然可以做很多非常酷的事情。