用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息

@robinhanson But which country did it come from? 😊

@罗宾汉森,但它来自哪个国家?😊

发表时间:9小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@robinhanson So like, historians in the year 3000 will be vaguely aware that the US had high inequality, self-contradictory foreign policy and was bad at healthcare, but will think that it's clearly the most awesome country because it made the best memes?
Plausible...

@罗宾·汉森(robinhanson)就像3000年的历史学家一样,他们会模糊地意识到美国有着高度的不平等,自相矛盾的外交政策,在医疗保健方面也很糟糕,但他们会认为美国显然是最令人敬畏的国家,因为它创造了最好的模因?
看似合理的

发表时间:13小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gakonst The word "blinis" unnecessarily doubles the plural; the "i" in "blini" (блины) is already a plural ending.
But on the other hand...
The Russian word тулзы ("tulzy") is slang for "tools", adding the Russian plural ending onto a word that already has an "s".

@gakonst“blinis”一词不必要地将复数翻了一番;“blini”(ббиы)中的“i”已经是复数结尾。
但另一方面。。。
俄语单词tulzy是“tools”的俚语,在已经有“s”的单词上加上俄语复数结尾。

发表时间:19小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Versatile_Crypt @AnthonyLeeZhang Oh I am assuming that humans still provide the plot and the script. So making a movie becomes as easy as writing a play.

@多才多艺的[email protected]哦,我假设人类仍然提供了情节和脚本。所以拍电影就像写剧本一样简单。

发表时间:1天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Claim: the crypto space is weird and dumb and we should go back to mainstream institutions which are ruled by adults.
Reality: https://twitter.com/RudyGiulia...

Great products at reasonable prices. Use code Rudy for additional savings https://t.co/O6EvkxHRt8

发表时间:2天前 作者:Rudy W. Giuliani @RudyGiuliani

声明:加密空间既奇怪又愚蠢,我们应该回到由成年人统治的主流机构。
现实:https://twitter.com/RudyGiulia...

物美价廉。使用代码Rudy可节省额外费用https://t.co/O6EvkxHRt8

发表时间:1天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@WatcherGuru I was looking through my old files and remembered that as a teenager I was also a game developer.
This is the most complex one I made:
https://vitalik.ca/files/misc_...
Though I never figured out how to "publish" it, and no one else has beaten even the tutorial so far 😭

@WatcherGuru我翻阅了我的旧文件,记得十几岁的时候我也是一名游戏开发者。
这是我做的最复杂的一个:
https://vitalik.ca/files/misc_...
虽然我从来没有想出如何“发布”它,而且到目前为止,没有人能打败甚至教程😭

发表时间:1天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@AnthonyLeeZhang I'm expecting/hoping that the cost of AI moviemaking is going to go way down soon.

@AnthonyLeeShang我期待/希望人工智能电影制作的成本很快会下降。

发表时间:1天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr Even in the hypothetical case where the US actually is on a path to becoming a low-government society, whether that looks like a market vs a mob vs an oligopoly of organized firms is a very open question.

@vgr即使在假设的情况下,美国实际上正在成为一个低政府社会,这看起来是否像市场对暴徒对有组织公司的寡头垄断,也是一个非常开放的问题。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr Zooming out a bit, "big government" and "big business" were only ever two legs of the triad (of risky forms of large-scale coordination). "Big mob" might be an equally pejorative way to describe the third one.

@vgr缩小了一点,“大政府”和“大企业”只是三位一体(大规模协调的风险形式)的两条腿。“大暴徒”可能是描述第三个暴徒的一种同样贬义的方式。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr There were pressures acting on employees and leadership at the intra-firm and cross-firm level, and the final result looked like a very harmonized policy shift across many platforms - not like market firms specializing.

@vgr在公司内部和跨公司层面上,员工和领导层承受着压力,最终结果看起来像是跨许多平台的非常协调的政策转变,而不像专业化的市场公司。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr I don't think "relegated to the markets" is an accurate description. Like sure, Twitter banning Trump was a non-governmental actor deciding to stop serving a customer, but the processes that led to that happening don't look at all like firms acting on their supply/demand curves.

@vgr我不认为“降级到市场”是一个准确的描述。诚然,推特禁止特朗普是一个决定停止为客户服务的非政府行为体,但导致这种情况发生的过程看起来根本不像是按照供需曲线行事的公司。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@EliBenSasson @PapiniShahar @Justindr @TimBeiko @dankrad Isn't it standard in ethereum land to associate a block with the post-state of that block? After all, the post-state is what actually gets hashed into that block's header.

@[email protected]@[email protected]@dankrad在以太坊土地上,将一个街区与该街区的后状态相关联不是标准吗?毕竟,post状态实际上是散列到该块头中的状态。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Probably the silliest anti-blockchain argument, IMO, is that it doesn't have credit card purchase protection, chargebacks, etc. You are literally forcing everyone to pay 2% of _everything they buy with a credit card_ for purchase protection! 2%!!!

RT:IMO,最愚蠢的反区块链论点可能是,它没有信用卡购买保护、退款等。你实际上是在强迫每个人支付他们用信用卡购买的所有东西的2%作为购买保护!2%!!!

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

I'm not usually a modern art appreciatooooor but I genuinely think the one on the right looks cooler. https://twitter.com/michaeljkn...

Why would a guy who could paint the picture on the left choose to paint the picture on the right? https://t.co/eb0pFEk89l

发表时间:4天前 作者:Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles

我通常不是一个现代艺术欣赏者,但我真的认为右边的那个看起来很酷。https://twitter.com/michaeljkn...

为什么一个会在左边画画的人会选择在右边画画?https://t.co/eb0pFEk89l

发表时间:2天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees I really don't think total validator count being too low is a significant possibility. Remember that because of prio fees + MEV, the reward curve steepens to r ~ 1/deposits when deposits are near zero.

@[email protected]@weboftrees我真的不认为验证器总数太低是一个很大的可能性。请记住,由于prio费用+MEV,当存款接近零时,奖励曲线会变陡至r~1/存款。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees Right, so discouragement attacks would be viable under any level of demand (as opposed to the economic limiting proposal, where they're only viable under very exceptional scenarios)

@[email protected]@weboftrees是的,因此劝阻性攻击在任何需求水平下都是可行的(与经济限制方案相反,在经济限制方案中,只有在非常特殊的情况下才可行)

发表时间:3天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Bananaplanet2 @drakefjustin @weboftrees I would say keep it single-slot but make slot time variable (or rather, cancel slots that aren't a multiple of whatever extended duration you want). Definitely a reasonable direction to explore compromising.

@[email protected]@weboftrees我想说的是,保持单时隙,但时隙时间可变(或者更确切地说,取消不是您想要的延长时间倍数的时隙)。这绝对是探索妥协的合理方向。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@koeppelmann @drakefjustin @weboftrees Unfortunately targeting an exact count makes discouragement attack incentives really horrible.
See https://github.com/ethereum/re... https://t.co/fiSD5a3G6T

@[email protected]@weboftrees不幸的是,目标精确的数字使得泄气攻击的动机非常可怕。
看见https://github.com/ethereum/re... https://t.co/fiSD5a3G6T

发表时间:3天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Some different approaches for capping the validator set size, to decrease the load of a beacon chain node and make Ethereum more ready for single-slot finality:
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
Thanks @drakefjustin @weboftrees for help!

限制验证器集大小的一些不同方法,以减少信标链节点的负载,并使以太坊更容易实现单插槽最终性:
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb。。。
感谢@[email protected]weboftrees的帮助!

发表时间:3天前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情