@ESYudkowsky It's not a one shot game though.
@ESYudkowsky 不过，这不是单杆游戏。
用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息
@00278jzu Actually I'm *very* anti-omakase 😂
@00278jzu 其实我*非常*反对omakase😂
Omakase <-> synthetic technocracy
Everyone orders for themselves <-> corporate libertarianism
Family style <-> digital democracy
大濑
@pourteaux I think there is an actual failure to connect these two dots going on.
@pourteaux 我认为连接这两个点实际上是失败的。
@pourteaux From a US perspective, some orthodoxies seem stifling, and breaking out of liberalism to ask "what if the dictator is good?" feels liberating. But this ignores that from the perspective inside the dictatorial countries, it is the dictator's orthodoxy that's the stifling one.
@pourteaux 从美国的角度来看，一些正统观念似乎令人窒息，并打破自由主义问“如果独裁者是好人怎么办？”感觉很自由。但这忽略了从独裁国家内部来看，令人窒息的是独裁者的正统观念。
@apolynya Maybe this is yet another pressure for all rollups to stick with strict EVM 😛
@apolynya 也许这是所有汇总都坚持严格 EVM 的另一个压力😛
@apolynya Use the PSE ZK-EVM as the second prover?
@apolynya 使用 PSE ZK-EVM 作为第二个证明者？
Slides from my presentation on multi-provers in rollups today:
https://hackmd.io/@vbuterin/zk...
我今天在汇总中关于多证明者的演示文稿中的幻灯片：
https://hackmd.io/@vbuterin/zk...
@vgr Same vibe 😛
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...
3. One important issue is that "crypto" means different things to different people.
To me, the core of "crypto" is the tech and mechanisms. ZK-SNARKs, BLS, auction models, x*y=k, quadratic funding... shape rotating all the way
Pairings literally use 12-dimensional curve twists! https://t.co/t89S1BzhXf
@vgr 同样的氛围😛
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...
3. 一个重要的问题是“加密”对不同的人意味着不同的东西。
对我来说，“加密”的核心是技术和机制。 ZK-SNARKs、BLS、拍卖模型、x*y=k、二次融资……形状一路旋转
配对字面上使用 12 维曲线扭曲！ https://t.co/t89S1BzhXf
@vgr Same vibe
https://mobile.twitter.com/tsz...
deep learning vs crypto is a clear divide of rotators vs wordcels. the former offends theorycel aesthetic sensibilities but empirically works to produce absurd miracles. the latter is an insane series of nerd traps and sky high abstraction ladders yet mostly scams
发表时间：2年前 作者：roon @tszzl@vgr 同样的氛围
https://mobile.twitter.com/tsz...
深度学习与加密是旋转器与字单元的明显区别。前者冒犯了理论上的审美敏感性，但在经验上却创造了荒谬的奇迹。后者是一系列疯狂的书呆子陷阱和天高的抽象梯子，但大多是骗局
@vrsvendsen1 @iyad_elbaghdadi Nah, ideally some democratic thing that bypasses governments entirely.
@vrsvendsen1 @iyad_elbaghdadi 不，理想情况下是完全绕过政府的民主事物。
@iyad_elbaghdadi Another question: is the global systemic importance of Twitter too high to allow the United States to control it?
@iyad_elbaghdadi 另一个问题：Twitter 的全球系统重要性是否太高，以至于美国无法控制它？
@pourteaux minimalism = based
@pourteaux 极简主义 = 基于
@Aella_Girl This one was up there for me!
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...
@DeepCipher @shl @elonmusk Disparities in economic success between men and women are far larger once marriage+children enter the picture. Synthetic wombs would remove the high burden of pregnancy, significantly reducing the inequality.
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/...
@Aella_Girl 这个是给我的！
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...
@一旦有了婚姻和孩子，男性和女性在经济成功方面的差距就会大得多。人造子宫将消除怀孕的高负担，显著减少不平等。
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/...
@RalphEmmers @MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson Right but the Russian civilization meme has basically zero appeal to Ukraine now, and even before the war a majority wanted to be closer to the EU.
Maybe civilizationism is inherently appealing to centers but not to peripheries.
@RalphEmmers @MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson 是的，但俄罗斯文明模因现在对乌克兰的吸引力基本上为零，甚至在战争之前，大多数人都希望更接近欧盟。
也许文明主义天生就吸引中心而不是外围。
@MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson One of the big flaws with it is lack of any game theory intuition. Voluntarily joining a tight coalition where another nearby country has 80% of the power is very dangerous - hence why periphery countries of other cultural spheres often huddle up to the US.
@MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson 它的一大缺陷是缺乏任何博弈论直觉。自愿加入另一个邻国拥有 80% 权力的紧密联盟是非常危险的——这就是为什么其他文化领域的外围国家经常与美国挤在一起的原因。
@6ix_smith @Noahpinion That's not a hack though, that's an attempted frontal assault on the underlying problem (rules that are actually really harmful, but have narratives about how they protect people that sound good)
But given how fast NIMBYism is falling, maybe it could be done!
@6ix_smith @Noahpinion 这不是黑客攻击，而是对潜在问题的正面攻击（实际上确实有害的规则，但有关于它们如何保护听起来不错的人的叙述）
但是考虑到邻避主义的下降速度有多快，也许可以做到！
@MazMHussain @lndian_Bronson He was right about the presence of conflict, but very wrong on the details (eg. quite ironically the first section strongly asserts that a Ukraine vs Russia war is unlikely)
@MazMHussain @lndian_Bronson 他对冲突的存在是正确的，但在细节上却非常错误（例如，具有讽刺意味的是，第一部分强烈断言乌克兰与俄罗斯的战争不太可能发生）
@MazMHussain Started reading Clash of Civilizations recently. 1/6 in, and so far it's feeling like the End of History (the book, not the meme) has aged much better
@MazMHussain 最近开始阅读《文明冲突》。 1/6 英寸，到目前为止，感觉就像历史的终结（书，而不是模因）已经老化了很多
@Noahpinion CC @elidourado have you by any chance thought about this issue?
@Noahpinion CC @elidourado 你有没有想过这个问题？