用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息

@jgarzik @pilotdavecfi @vgr Consensus layer is the FAA regs for air, and a complicated mix of infrastructure spending constraints, zoning issues and property rights for trains.

@jgarzik @pilotdavecfi @vgr 共识层是美国联邦航空局的航空法规,以及基础设施支出限制、分区问题和火车产权的复杂组合。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@zacharynado My entire line of tech has to do with doing the dirty work of getting consensus on things, and a key learning for me has been that initially-impossible-seeming tech wizardry that doesn't require consensus can sometimes outpace theoretically simple things that do.

@zacharynado 我的整个技术线都与在事情上达成共识的肮脏工作有关,而对我来说,一个关键的学习是,最初看似不可能的技术巫术不需要共识,有时可能会超过理论上简单的事情做。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@vgr The other pro-airplane take is simply that HSR requires consensus-layer changes to L1 whereas airplanes are mostly L2 with relatively lighter L1 work required (pushing to change FAA and a few other regs), and doing things at L2 is 10x easier.
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@Noahpinion My heterodox take on US transit is that if infrastructure problems are too hard to solve, the transit of the future is airplanes, and we should just make airplanes better by (i) making them zero-carbon, and (ii) improving comfort by greatly cutting down airport security

发表时间:1年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@vgr 另一个亲飞机的做法是,HSR 需要对 L1 进行共识层更改,而飞机大多是 L2,需要相对较轻的 L1 工作(推动更改 FAA 和其他一些规则),并且在 L2 上做事要容易 10 倍.
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@Noahpinion 我对美国过境的非正统看法是,如果基础设施问题太难解决,那么未来的过境就是飞机,我们应该通过(i)使其零碳和(ii)提高舒适度来让飞机变得更好通过大大减少机场安全

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gakonst Soviet Union approach to value extraction 👹

@gakonst 苏联价值提取方法👹

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Select replies to my poll on blue checks, selected for... I'm not sure what exactly. But anyway: https://t.co/R1t9HbgYHx

选择对我的蓝色支票投票的回复,选择... 我不确定到底是什么。但无论如何:https://t.co/R1t9HbgYHx

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Twitter's blue check mechanism is (compared to not having it at all)

Twitter 的蓝色检查机制是(与根本没有它相比)

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Is a "sidecar" a piece of software, a data blob that's not in the main RLP or SSZ hash structure, something else?
I've been hearing multiple meanings...

“sidecar”是一个软件,一个不在主 RLP 或 SSZ 哈希结构中的数据块,还是别的什么?
我听过很多意思...

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Honestly, not wanting to be the kind of person who would have owned slaves or been silent about the Holocaust is a key part of my moral drive https://twitter.com/robertskmi...

RT:老实说,不想成为那种拥有奴隶或对大屠杀保持沉默的人是我道德驱动的关键部分 https://twitter.com/robertskmi...

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Someone should make a project called "THE Protocol", so that their shills can say "Look, soandso mentioned THE!" pretty much any time anyone says anything.

有人应该做一个名为“THE Pr​​otocol”的项目,这样他们的shills就可以说“看,soandso提到了THE!”几乎任何时候有人说什么。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

"We are going to enable open order flow. Open order flow means NO proprietary first party deals between users, wallets and builders or validators. These deals have been horrible in tradfi" - @phildaian https://t.co/2pB14P5hqf

“我们将启用开放订单流程。开放订单流程意味着用户、钱包和构建者或验证者之间没有专有的第一方交易。这些交易在 tradfi 中非常糟糕” - @phildaian https://t.co/2pB14P5hqf

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@dankrad @kobigurk We already overload point + point and point * scalar, why not point * point too!

@dankrad @kobigurk 我们已经重载了点点和点*标量,为什么不点*点呢!

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Based @dankrad using additive notation even for the pairing group. https://t.co/uIu7nQEYYl

基于 @dankrad 使用加法符号,即使是配对组。 https://t.co/uIu7nQEYYl

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@santisiri Cooperation, not unity imo.

@santisiri 合作,而不是团结 imo。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@robertwiblin @JohnHMcWhorter And what are the biggest mistakes be thinks conlang people are making

@robertwiblin @JohnHMcWhorter 认为 conlang 人犯的最大错误是什么

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@robertwiblin @JohnHMcWhorter What is his favorite conlang and why

@robertwiblin @JohnHMcWhorter 他最喜欢的 conlang 是什么以及为什么

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

The Vatican: 2.2 popes per square kilometer
Bogota: 2 POAPs per square meter https://t.co/FoYyZyMyrW

梵蒂冈:每平方公里2.2位教皇
波哥大:每平方米 2 个 POAP https://t.co/FoYyZyMyrW

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

The cool thing about this idea is that it has great cross-tribal appeal.
Translated into IDW speak, for example: "50 actually independent thinkers are worth more than 1000 NPCs who all consume the same media and vote the same way". Very appealing to that group.

这个想法很酷的地方在于它具有很大的跨部落吸引力。
翻译成 IDW 演讲,例如:“50 个真正独立的思想家比 1000 多个消费相同媒体并以相同方式投票的 NPC 更有价值”。对那个群体非常有吸引力。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@owocki @gitcoin Thank you for your contributions to anti-fascism!

@owocki @gitcoin 感谢您对反法西斯主义的贡献!

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

See also: https://ethresear.ch/t/pairwis...
Highly scoring agreement if it's coming from diverse sources - an important idea in social mechanism design https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

At @EFDevcon:
@glenweyl: "... so we count a group of people less if they are all correlated with each other..."
@VladZamfir: "Ooh, is that like punishing fascism?"
@glenweyl: "Kind of!"

发表时间:1年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

另见:https://ethresear.ch/ t/pairwis...
来自不同来源的高分一致性 - 社会机制设计中的一个重要理念 https://twitter.com/ Vitalik但是...

在@EFDevcon:
@glenweyl:“......所以如果他们都相互关联,我们会减少一组人......”
@VladZamfir:“哦,这就像惩罚法西斯主义吗?”
@glenweyl:“有点!”

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

At @EFDevcon:
@glenweyl: "... so we count a group of people less if they are all correlated with each other..."
@VladZamfir: "Ooh, is that like punishing fascism?"
@glenweyl: "Kind of!"

在@EFDevcon:
@glenweyl:“......所以如果他们都相互关联,我们会减少一组人......”
@VladZamfir:“哦,这就像惩罚法西斯主义吗?”
@glenweyl:“有点!”

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情