用户 ReggieMiddleton(@ ReggieMiddleton) 的最新消息

Here are the other videos in the series...
Layman's Explanation of EU Negative interest Rates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
How and Why the ECB Manipulates the Money Supply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Pt 4 of Fireside Chat: NY Baccarat Hotel: Think Global (Macro)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

以下是该系列中的其他视频。。。
外行对欧盟负利率的解释
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
欧洲央行如何以及为什么操纵货币供应
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
炉边聊天第4部分:纽约百家乐酒店:思考全球(宏观)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

发表时间:5小时前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Hexamortis @HEXcrypto Learn what inflation is, what a Ponzi is, and what relative value is. You've asked a question and answered it yourself in a single Tweet. Goodnight and happy holidays.

@[email protected]了解什么是通货膨胀,什么是庞氏骗局,什么是相对价值。你已经问了一个问题,并在一条推文中自己回答了。晚安,节日快乐。

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Hexamortis @Coach_Swift81 @HEXcrypto @hex @RichardHeartWlN Enough. Good luck to you and your fiat belief in @RichardHeartWlN machinations. If you have significant capital tied up in #HEX, you had best be right that he is both a genius and ethical. I doubt either.
The law says HEX is a Ponzi and pyramid, economics does too!

@[email protected][email protected]@[email protected]够了。祝你好运,你的菲亚特相信@RichardHeartWlN的阴谋。如果你在#HEX有大量资金,你最好是对的,他既是天才又有道德。我也怀疑。
法律说HEX是庞氏骗局和金字塔,经济学也是如此!

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Hexamortis @HEXcrypto I did not audit the smart contract. We audited the business model, and found it to be a Ponzi. Hex does no work yet has no intrinsic value. If I am wrong show me, Thus far you said it pays inflation, which proves my point. It pays a negative.

@[email protected] I没有审核智能合约。我们审核了商业模式,发现它是一个庞氏骗局。十六进制不起作用,但没有内在价值。如果我错了,告诉我,到目前为止,你说它会带来通货膨胀,这证明了我的观点。它的回报是负的。

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Coach_Swift81 @Hexamortis @HEXcrypto Firstly, @HEX is fiat so the question that you're asking is redundant. The only value that HEx has is borne from the belief that @RichardHeartWlN is not lying to you.
$USD fiat has fundamental value in being: A) global reserve currency, and B) sovereign note of worlds largest gun

@教练[email protected]@HEXcrypto首先,@HEX是菲亚特,所以你问的问题是多余的。HEx的唯一价值来自于@RichardHeartWlN没有对你撒谎的信念。
美元法定货币的基本价值在于:A)全球储备货币,B)世界上最大的枪支的主权纸币

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Hexamortis @HEXcrypto Miners don't mint inflation. They secure the chain, computationally, i.e., by doing actual work, hence increasing the value of the chain then getting paid for their work and value increase through additional tokens. Those are facts. Who does work in #Hex & where's the value add?

@[email protected]矿工不会制造通货膨胀。他们通过计算确保链的安全,即通过实际工作,从而增加链的价值,然后通过额外的代币获得工作报酬和价值增加。这些都是事实。谁在Hex&;工作;增值在哪里?

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@Hexamortis @HEXcrypto Listen to what you typed. How do you "pay inflation"? That is the same as saying "pay taxes"? Does paying taxes make you wealthier?

@[email protected]听听你键入的内容。你如何“支付通货膨胀”?这和说“交税”是一样的吗?纳税会让你更富有吗?

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

RT: We all could see this. @ReggieMiddleton had the guts to call them out directly. https://twitter.com/l33tguy/st...

RT:我们都可以看到这一点@雷吉·米德尔顿有勇气直接把他们叫出来。https://twitter.com/l33tguy/st...

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

36 pg warning in April about @HEXcrypto Ponzi. #FOMO conjuring & sparse liquidity (among other "tricks") pushed the "perceived" price of this token sky high. Problem with liquidity? It's always there, until you need it. Tokens are locked as they plummet https://veritas.veritaseum.com... https://t.co/JY0ca2RVeV

4月份关于@HEXcrypto Ponzi的36 pg警告#FOMO变戏法&;稀疏的流动性(以及其他“把戏”)推高了这种代币的“感知”价格。流动性问题?它总是在那里,直到你需要它。代币在下落时被锁定https://veritas.veritaseum.com... https://t.co/JY0ca2RVeV

发表时间:1天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@DualCollections @JohnEDeaton1 Easy dude! Don't let those facts get in the way of free thinking.

@[email protected]轻松小子!不要让这些事实妨碍自由思考。

发表时间:3天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@infusecrypto @clif_high @RealVision I'm not going to agree to disagree, because we arent disagreeing. You failed to read, or did not understand. Read the part about keversge, optikbs and why I chose CRE, warehouses

@[email protected][email protected]我不会同意不同意,因为我们没有不同意。你没有阅读,或者不理解。阅读有关keversge、optikbs和我为什么选择CRE、warehouses的部分

发表时间:5天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@StakeMyStacks I've been doing it since 2013, just internally. You will be seeing the fruits of the labor, quite vividly, starting 1st quarter of next year. You're going to be quite proud of us!!!!

@StakeMyStacks我从2013年就开始这么做了,只是在内部。从明年第一季度开始,你将非常生动地看到劳动成果。你会为我们感到骄傲的!!!!

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@infusecrypto @clif_high Cash is the dry powder to expand the portfolio at will. An inflation hedge, if actually successful, would fail the challenge that @RealVision put forth. The goal is not to hedge inflation, it's to beat inflation by 10%. Again, you need to read the question.

@[email protected]_high Cash是随意扩大投资组合的干燥剂。通胀对冲如果真的成功,将无法应对@RealVision提出的挑战。我们的目标不是对冲通胀,而是将通胀率降低10%。同样,你需要阅读问题。

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

To show how stringent my personal investment criteria is, I demand a 15% real, after tax, risk-adjusted return for my portfolio. But I actively manage my stuff. Here, IMO, the #SP500 is offering a flat nominal return of roughly zero. Factor in risk/taxes, It's deeply negative! https://t.co/PGmpxp2LWx

为了证明我的个人投资标准有多么严格,我要求我的投资组合有15%的税后实际风险调整回报。但我积极管理我的东西。在这方面,国际海事组织(IMO),SP500的名义回报率大致为零。考虑到风险/税收因素,这是非常负面的!https://t.co/PGmpxp2LWx

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

For those who don't fully grasp the power of this tweet, note that using the @federalreserve own data, $USD 9% or it' value over the last 23 months, and this figure is likely guaranteedly understated. https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

$USDT on sale for $0.78 in India, crashing in $INR. Wait a minute? Aren't stablecoins supposed to represent a threat to the financial system? Then how could arbitrageurs have rectified the mispricing so quickly? Can $USD say the same? I see more risk of loss in USD. Don't you? https://t.co/uxcaDXs6bP

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton

对于那些没有完全理解这条推文的力量的人,请注意,使用@federalreserve自己的数据,过去23个月的价值为9美元或它的价值,这个数字很可能被低估了。https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

美元兑美元在印度的售价为0.78美元,暴跌为卢比。等一下?StableCoin不应该对金融系统构成威胁吗?那么套利者怎么能如此迅速地纠正错误定价呢?美元也可以这么说吗?我认为美元的损失风险更大。你不觉得吗?https://t.co/uxcaDXs6bP

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@infusecrypto @clif_high Snarky comments from guys who don't even know how to read the question? Since when, in modern history, have PMs given you a 10% real return over a full decade?
It's okay if you don't really know this stuff, but if you aren't well versed in it - keep the insults to yourself.

@[email protected]_从那些甚至不知道如何阅读问题的家伙那里得到的尖刻评论?从什么时候开始,在现代历史上,经前综合症在整整十年里给了你10%的实际回报?
如果你真的不懂这些东西没关系,但是如果你对它不太精通,那就不要侮辱自己。

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

$USDT on sale for $0.78 in India, crashing in $INR. Wait a minute? Aren't stablecoins supposed to represent a threat to the financial system? Then how could arbitrageurs have rectified the mispricing so quickly? Can $USD say the same? I see more risk of loss in USD. Don't you? https://t.co/uxcaDXs6bP

美元兑美元在印度的售价为0.78美元,暴跌为卢比。等一下?StableCoin不应该对金融系统构成威胁吗?那么套利者怎么能如此迅速地纠正错误定价呢?美元也可以这么说吗?我认为美元的损失风险更大。你不觉得吗?https://t.co/uxcaDXs6bP

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@clif_high @RaoulGMI Oh, and before anybody starts with their nonsense, No! I am not recommending ANYONE go out and buy VERI. I was simply answering an academic question posed by @RaoulGMI and @RealVision

@[email protected]噢,在任何人开始胡说八道之前,不要!我不建议任何人出去买VERI。我只是回答了@RaoulGMI和@RealVision提出的一个学术问题

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@clif_high Be aware that the portfolio I mentioned is quite heavily weighted in crypto, for VERI is likely the strongest proxy for the crypto industry there is.

@clif_high请注意,我提到的投资组合在加密方面的权重相当大,因为VERI可能是加密行业最强大的代理。

发表时间:6天前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情