Amazingly enough, I'm the only one in social media or the analyst community that warns of material risks that @makerdao is taking in sending $1.6B of $USDC (infringing '566) to @coinbase.
$COIN infringement suit https://cointelegraph.com/news...
@inventfi v MakerDAO https://twitter.com/safety/uns... https://t.co/WvHt6RDl4x
令人惊讶的是，我是社交媒体或分析师社区中唯一一个警告@makerdao 向@coinbase 发送 1.6B 美元的 $USDC（侵犯 '566）所承担的重大风险的人。
$COIN 侵权诉讼 https://cointelegraph.com /新闻...
@inventfi v MakerDAO 发表时间：1年前 作者：ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情
@TheDanDraper1 @netlix @FCC What .gov needs to do is come to terms with the fact that software and distributed networks allow for functionality that simply wasn't envisioned a century or so ago. It's not as if that is a far-fetched concept. Let's create progressive legislation & regulation that makes sense.
@TheDanDraper1 @netlix @FCC .gov 需要做的是接受这样一个事实，即软件和分布式网络允许一个世纪前根本没有想到的功能。这似乎不是一个牵强的概念。让我们制定进步立法
@TheDanDraper1 To be clear, the ability to serve a DAO (essentially an unincorporated business entity) has nothing to do with the merits of the CFTC's action. I don't necessarily believe that a DEX is an exchange, If it is, then other software gets caught. Should @Netlix be @FCC regulated???
@TheDanDraper1 需要明确的是，为 DAO（本质上是非法人企业实体）服务的能力与 CFTC 行动的优点无关。我不一定相信 DEX 是交易所，如果是，那么其他软件就会被抓住。 @Netlix 是否应该受到 @FCC 的监管？？？
@DonnXRP @ZachRector7 Thanks!
@DonnXRP @ZachRector7 谢谢！
What's (extremely) positive about this is that judges aren't simply rubber-stamping whims of regulators as plaintiffs, but instead actually examining the facts and the law - sort of like a court of law! I actually think DAOs should be able to be served, but it must past muster! https://twitter.com/MarcGoldic...
Judge Orrick granted @LeXpunK_Army’s Motion for Leave in the Ooki case and is treating it as a Motion for Reconsideration of the decision to permit alternative service on the DAO. LeXpunK’s brief is due 10/17 and CFTC has to file an opposition on 11/7. A positive development. 💪 https://t.co/IMFdenGmcx
发表时间：1年前 作者：𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚌 𝗚𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗵 @MarcGoldich对此（非常）积极的是，法官不仅仅是将监管机构作为原告的橡皮图章一时兴起，而是实际审查事实和法律 - 有点像法庭！我实际上认为 DAO 应该能够被服务，但它必须通过集合！ https://twitter.com/MarcGoldic...
Orrick 法官批准了@LeXpunK_Army 在 Ooki 案中的休假动议，并将其视为重新考虑允许在 DAO 上提供替代服务的决定的动议。 LeXpunK 的简报将于 10 月 17 日到期，CFTC 必须在 11 月 7 日提出反对意见。一个积极的发展。 💪 https://t.co/IMFdenGmcx
@AlexHamideh You have to ask the SEC "about us VERI token holders." They are the ones that deliberately stripped the value from the token, separated the token from Veritaseum operations and labeled the operator a fraud while throwing additional uncertainty into the status of the token.
@AlexHamideh 您必须向 SEC 询问“关于我们 VERI 代币持有者的情况”。他们故意从代币中剥离价值，将代币与 Veritaseum 运营分开，并将运营商标记为欺诈，同时给代币的状态带来额外的不确定性。
@ChainlinkMVP @digitalassetbuy @circle @MakerDAO @CFTC @LeXpunK_Army @stephendpalley @a16z Specifically what victory. Cite the actual ruling.
@ChainlinkMVP @digitalassetbuy @circle @MakerDAO @CFTC @LeXpunK_Army @stephendpalley @a16z 具体是什么胜利。引用实际裁决。
@digitalassetbuy Assuming $USDC does infringe on patent US11196566, then @circle pushes that infringement as contagion throughout the crypto & traditional financial industries. As a matter of fact, '566 infringement is compounded by infringement of other patents, i.e., as in @MakerDAO https://t.co/RWXtlyQL2e
@digitalassetbuy 假设 $USDC 确实侵犯了专利 US11196566，然后 @circle 将这种侵权行为推向整个加密货币的传染
RT: @ReggieMiddleton @digitalassetbuy @MakerDAO to Custody $1.6 Billion in $USDC w/ @Coinbase https://decrypt.co/112808/make.... If USDC infringes @veritaseuminc '566 patent while Coinbases is in a $350M+ suit over infringing the 566 patent https://cointelegraph.com/news... & $COIN & $USDC serve the majority of crypto, how safe is USDC? https://t.co/Y0MavKeQ74
RT：@ReggieMiddleton @digitalassetbuy @MakerDAO 以 $USDC 托管 16 亿美元 w/ @Coinbase https： //decrypt.co/112808/make...。如果 USDC 侵犯了@veritaseuminc '566 专利，而 Coinbases 因侵犯 566 专利而提起 3.5 亿美元的诉讼 https://cointelegraph.com/news...
@digitalassetbuy Assuming $USDC does infringe on patent US11196566, then @circle pushes that infringement as contagion throughout the crypto & traditional financial industries. As a matter of fact '566 infringement is compounded by infringement of other patents, i.e., @inventfi vs @MakerDAO https://t.co/8v3MfF0GOA
@digitalassetbuy 假设 $USDC 确实侵犯了专利 US11196566，然后 @circle 将这种侵权行为推向整个加密货币的传染
RT: I seem to remember someone by the name of @ReggieMiddleton developing and patenting this tech years ago.
https://cryptonewsland.com/spa...
RT：我似乎记得几年前有人以@ReggieMiddleton 的名义开发并申请了这项技术的专利。
https://cryptonewsland.com/spa...
RT: Another Example of How Patent Law Would've Been Handy For A Brother @ReggieMiddleton https://t.co/uxyc39X1Yn
RT：另一个专利法如何对兄弟有用的例子@ReggieMiddleton https://t.co/uxyc39X1Yn
@digitalassetbuy "Regulated" stablecoins are high risk, far from AAA, and improperly constructed w/ subpar due diligence. Remember when Centre (the USDC consortium) banned >38 USDC addresses after Tornado sanctions? That banning used @veritaseuminc patent US11196566 technology, https://t.co/LhOJJmldvm
@digitalassetbuy “受监管”的稳定币风险很高，远非 AAA 级，而且在尽职调查中构建不当。记住 Center（USDC 财团）何时被禁止
@Tonio_Reed I'm going to put out a series of tweets that explains this in a few minutes
@Tonio_Reed 我将在几分钟内发布一系列推文来解释这一点
This is starting to go viral. GOOD! It's high time truth started coming out. Let's start the convo of rampant risk in the stablecoin market. Instead of focusing on reserve quality, focus on operating & patent infringement risk affecting reserve availability. Impending truth bomb! https://twitter.com/digitalass...
👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 https://t.co/aPD0YeEPsf
发表时间：1年前 作者：Digital Asset Investor @digitalassetbuy这开始流行起来。好的！是时候真相大白了。让我们开始讨论稳定币市场中猖獗的风险。不注重储备质量，而是注重经营
👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 https://t.co/aPD0YeEPsf
@SilverSurferLGB @kanyewest @addidas Don't start commonsensing, you;re going to confuse somebody.
Chances are Addidas corporate handlers demanded the trigger be pulled and they are likely considerably less sensitive to shareholder value loss.
I'm not taking a position on this (pro nor con), just observing from afar
@SilverSurferLGB @kanyewest @addidas 不要开始常识，你会迷惑某人。
很可能 Addidas 的公司经理要求扣动扳机，他们对股东价值损失的敏感度可能大大降低。
我对此不持立场（赞成或反对），只是从远处观察
The @kanyewest effect? @addidas put thier politics before their profits. Was it the right thing to do for thier shareholders... thier corporate charter?
If Ye goes to a smaller, lesser known brand and blows them up, it will be an effective transfer of billions of corporate value https://t.co/iub77pAHcW
@kanyewest 效应？ @addidas 把他们的政治放在他们的利润之前。为他们的股东……他们的公司章程做正确的事吗？
如果 Ye 去一个较小的、鲜为人知的品牌并将其炸毁，这将是数十亿企业价值的有效转移 https://t.co/iub77pAHcW
China is following the same path as Japan, and armchair pundits have made the same judgement errors. Don't use bubble metrics as your baseline! The US will be very difficult to overcome!
China's economy will not overtake the US until 2060, if ever.
https://www.ft.com/content/cff...
中国和日本走的是同一条路，坐在椅子上的专家也犯了同样的判断错误。不要使用气泡指标作为您的基准！美国将很难战胜！
如果有的话，中国经济要到 2060 年才能赶超美国。
https://www.ft.com/content/cff...< /一>
The @Veritaseuminc message. https://t.co/Bat6DPbbu6
@Veritaseuminc 消息。 https://t.co/Bat6DPbbu6