Aeon 的最新消息

@ELarcinese @mdc_martinus I think some of his leaked emails may contradict this, but I don't recall the timeline.

@ELarcinese@mdc_martinus我认为他泄露的一些电子邮件可能与此相矛盾,但我不记得时间表。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GizmoOcean @Mw_ottawa @trendless @3M @JimRosenthal4 @CorsIAQ Also, some fan models are available in different speed variants.

@GizmoOcean@Mw_ottawa@trendless@3M@JimRosenthal4@CorsIAQ同样,一些风扇型号也有不同的速度变体。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GizmoOcean @Mw_ottawa @trendless @3M @JimRosenthal4 @CorsIAQ 200mm is the largest common size I think. They're usually speed adjustable, but may require a separate controller to do so (not expensive).

@GizmoOcean@Mw_ottawa@trendless@3M@JimRosenthal4@CorsIAQ 200mm是我认为最大的普通尺寸。它们通常速度可调,但可能需要一个单独的控制器来实现(不昂贵)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran Not just future waves, future pandemics!
Does it not strike anyone as odd that two years into a devastating airborne pandemic so little has been done to prevent or reduce the impact of another (potentially worse!) one?
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@joaquinlife Also, no sign it exists or is in development for a new pandemic which could be 10x worse and start tomorrow.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@AbraarKaran不仅仅是未来的浪潮,未来的流行病!
在一场毁灭性的空中大流行爆发两年后,人们在预防或减少另一场大流行(可能更糟!)的影响方面所做的工作如此之少,这难道不会让任何人感到奇怪吗一
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@joaquinlife也表示,没有迹象表明它存在或正在发展一种新的大流行,这种大流行可能会比明天更严重10倍。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@trendless That makes assembly easier for sure but might be unnecessarily expensive. However, I misremembered 240mm fans being common. The largest common size for PC fans is actually 200mm I think.

@这无疑会让组装变得更容易,但可能会造成不必要的昂贵。然而,我记错了240毫米风扇的普遍性。我认为PC风扇的最大通用尺寸实际上是200毫米。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Mw_ottawa @CassandraTSLAQ @3M @JimRosenthal4 @CorsIAQ Use a piece of ribbon that goes all the way around the filter

@Mw_ottawa@CassandraTSLAQ@3M@JimRosenthal4@CorsIAQ在过滤器周围使用一条丝带

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GizmoOcean @Mw_ottawa @trendless @3M @JimRosenthal4 @CorsIAQ They look like 120mm fans. One 240mm PC fan might be better (at least cheaper and simpler to assemble), but not sure.

@GizmoOcean@Mw_ottawa@trendless@3M@JimRosenthal4@CorsIAQ他们看起来像120毫米的风扇。一个240毫米PC风扇可能更好(至少更便宜,组装更简单),但不确定。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Unusual_Times Bots have always been hyperactive about any references to "0 CV". Been that way for two years.

@不寻常的时候,机器人总是对“0 CV”的任何引用极度活跃。这样已经两年了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@deadlystingnyc @Amalgamquietude @TheSkylineTrail @i_petersen About the same as masks don't work but they need to be reserved for healthcare workers.

@deadlystingnyc@Amalgamquietude@TheSkylineTrail@i_petersen与口罩不起作用差不多,但它们需要留给医护人员。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@climbtechy @MarvinH2_G2 @i_petersen It's way worse than the flu on average. Of course, individual cases vary from asymptomatic to death. Can't generalize from one bout of illness.

@Gramptechy@MarvinH2_G2@i_petersen这比平均流感严重得多。当然,个别病例从无症状到死亡各不相同。不能从一次疾病中一概而论。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MarvinH2_G2 @i_petersen Well, it's one way.

@MarvinH2_G2@i_petersen嗯,这是一种方式。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BernieDogs4 Someone should do a collage of these, they all read like they're written by the same publicist.

@Berniedogs应该有人拼贴这些东西,它们读起来都像是同一位公关写的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SheriD17536431 @MelpomeneMel @cbn2 @georgimarinov @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk 7 day average or week over week was always more useful due to different testing patterns on different days. Less frequent reporting doesn't change much.

@SheriD17536431@MelpomeneMel@cbn2@georgimarinov@BernieDogs4@BNODesk 7天平均值或每周平均值总是更有用,因为在不同的日子有不同的测试模式。不那么频繁的报道并没有多大改变。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@aanvigneron @imbernomics @notdred Depending on what they're doing, it may still be pointless. Most people don't need to be in an office all day every day. Occasional for in-person meetings is fine.

@aanvigneron@imbernomics@notdred取决于他们在做什么,这可能仍然是毫无意义的。大多数人不需要每天都呆在办公室里。偶尔见面也可以。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani @BallouxFrancois Quite obvious at individual level. Mortality rate is 1, time shifting is all that matters.

@Marco_Piani@BallouxFranco在个人层面上非常明显。死亡率为1,时间变化才是最重要的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani @BallouxFrancois Even numerical equivalent mortality is not the same if deaths are time shifted. This point is often missed.

@Marco_Piani@BallouxFrancois如果死亡是时移的,即使是数字上的等效死亡率也不一样。这一点经常被忽略。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@aanvigneron @imbernomics @notdred Similar argument. It's pointless to commute to an office for a zoom meeting.

@aanvigneron@imbernomics@没有提出类似的论点。去办公室开会是没有意义的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ghhughes @danaparish It's a lot less than 18 inches.

@Ghughes@danaparish这比18英寸小很多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl Where are the Omicron vaccines?

@wsbgnl Omicron疫苗在哪里?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情