@LazarusLong13 @EnemyInAState Retina is part of the brain

@LazarusLong13@enemyinate视网膜是大脑的一部分

@sinz54 @_Eric_Reinhart But, as the other reply suggests, I wonder to what extent the misreading drove the lack sustained policy, or opposition to sustained policy, and similar political motivations, drove the (at least partially intentional) misreading.

@sinz54(u Eric_Reinhart)但是,正如另一份答复所表明的那样,我想知道误读在多大程度上导致了缺乏持续政策,或反对持续政策,以及类似的政治动机,导致了误读(至少是部分故意的)。

@sinz54 @_Eric_Reinhart Accurate, but six months even is generous. By May 2020, roughly two months in, it was being declared over. Initial PUI, etc. expired in June. Each subsequent wave was declared to be the final two month wave.

@辛兹54(u Eric_Reinhart)准确,但即使是六个月也很慷慨。到2020年5月，也就是大约两个月前，它被宣布结束。最初的PUI等于6月到期。随后的每一次浪潮都被宣布为最后两个月的浪潮。

@juli_bg_bs However, even at somewhat higher numbers, it's still very reasonable to take the shot.

@然而，即使是在更高的数字下，采取行动仍然是非常合理的。

@juli_bg_bs I think this is relatively high risk populations though, since Israel didn't give the fourth dose to everyone.

@juli_bg_bs我认为这是相对高风险人群，因为以色列并没有给每个人注射第四剂。

@markonhiatus @juli_bg_bs They shouldn't, particularly if it is made convenient to get (and it should be!). The cost of a vaccine is very low.

@markonhiatus@juli_bg_bs他们不应该这样做，尤其是如果方便的话（应该是这样！）。疫苗的成本非常低。

@juli_bg_bs Bad conclusion here. It's basically saying that you need to vaccinate 56 people to prevent one serious illness over a year (assuming protection lasts a year, if needed every six months, might be double this). That's not bad at all!

@juli_bg_得出了不好的结论。它基本上是说，你需要为56人接种疫苗，以在一年内预防一种严重疾病（假设保护持续一年，如果每六个月需要，可能是这一数字的两倍）。一点也不坏！

@davidwdowdy @ContractJames @NEJM Assuming the added protection lasts a year, vaccinating 56 people to prevent one from becoming seriously ill doesn't seem bad at all.

@davidwdowdy@ContractJames@NEJM假设额外的保护措施持续一年，为56人接种疫苗以防止一人重病似乎一点也不坏。

@thereal_truther What is truly dangerous are all the people stupid enough to believe it, or willing to pretend to believe it in order to secure inclusion in a tribe.

@真正危险的是所有愚蠢到相信它的人，或者为了确保融入一个部落而愿意假装相信它的人。

@ChrisWhitney23 @JReinerMD There are basically no 100% in biology.

@CHRISWITNEY23@JReinerMD在生物学中基本上没有100%。

@BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 First phase was supposed to test each half of the city in five days, so I guess that's around 2 million per day. Not sure of the population of each side.

@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431第一阶段本应在五天内对城市的每一半进行测试，所以我猜这大约是每天200万次。不确定双方的人口。

@LetsLoveLisa @steeltrack52 @BNODesk Potentially some of that, also false negatives and people early in incubation period when tested.

@LetsLoveLisa@steeltrack52@BNODesk可能会检测到其中的一些，也可能是假阴性，以及检测时处于潜伏期早期的人。

@steeltrack52 @BNODesk You expect it to work 100%? Even 99% would necessitate further measures, potentially repeat mass testing.

@steeltrack52@BNODesk你希望它能100%工作吗？即使是99%也需要采取进一步措施，可能会重复大规模测试。

@FJMartins9 @NotWoofers These are "short range" drones. The operator is local.

@FJMartins9@NotWoofers这些是“短程”无人机。接线员是本地人。

@selise @hjelle_brian Northeast seems to be rising contrary to the broader trend. Perhaps the rest will follow, hard to say.

@selise@hjelle_brian Northeast的增长似乎与整体趋势相反。很难说，接下来的事情可能会接踵而至。

@joaquinlife Also, no sign it exists or is in development for a new pandemic which could be 10x worse and start tomorrow.

@joaquinlife也表示，没有迹象表明它存在或正在发展一种新的大流行，这种大流行可能会比明天更严重10倍。

@tia_loret @JevensenJevy @Unusual_Times "I have heard people say they last 4 or 5 years? Is that always true?"
No

@tia_loret@JevensenJevy@unspecial_Times“我听说人们说他们能坚持4到5年？这总是真的吗？”
不

@selise @hjelle_brian What wastewater data there is also shows an aggregate decline, with some localized increases, but you're right it isn't that comprehensive.

@selise@hjelle_brian What Wastewagen的数据也显示总体下降，局部上升，但你是对的，这并没有那么全面。

@hjelle_brian "Cases" is heavily biased toward more severe cases that are more likely to be counted. So more likely to move in lockstep with hospitalizations and deaths than actual infections.

@hjelle_brian的“病例”严重偏向于更可能被统计的更严重的病例。因此，与实际感染相比，更可能与住院和死亡同步。

@jklmd123 Right wing governments.

@jklmd123右翼政府。