@JCooper93488061 @davidwdowdy @ContractJames @NEJM Six weeks is all the data we have. If there is no sign at all of waning in six weeks, it probably doesn't happen "very fast". When it might, who knows.

@JCooper93488061@davidwdowdy@ContractJames@NEJM六周是我们所有的数据。如果在六周内没有任何减退的迹象，它可能不会“很快”发生。可能的时候，谁知道呢。

@LisaKCutler @JonLemire Only if you run a hospital.

@LisaKCutler@JonLemire只有在你经营医院的情况下。

@JCooper93488061 @davidwdowdy @ContractJames @NEJM ARR has a time factor. If the added protection lasts a long time, the absolute risk reduction increases dramatically over what is seen in a short study. There was no sign of waning against severe disease during six weeks.

@JCooper93488061@davidwdowdy@ContractJames@NEJM ARR有一个时间因素。如果增加的保护持续很长时间，绝对风险降低会比短期研究中所见的显著增加。在六周内，没有迹象表明对抗严重疾病的能力有所减弱。

@smarmy_meatball @davidwdowdy @ContractJames @NEJM No evidence of that for severe disease
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/... https://t.co/yqZvCniwr8

@smarmy_meatball@davidwdowdy@ContractJames@NEJM没有证据表明严重疾病会出现这种情况
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/... https://t.co/yqZvCniwr8

@MarvinH2_G2 Food too
https://www.fao.org/worldfoods...

@马文也是食物
https://www.fao.org/worldfoods...

@georgimarinov @cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 TikTok attention spans. A few months is like some future century.

@乔治马里诺夫@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431 TikTok注意事项。几个月就像未来的世纪。

@Noahpinion "But every time you buy Bitcoin at $45,000, it means there’s someone out there who owns Bitcoin, but who doesn’t buy those stories"
This part isn't quite true because of mining.

@Noahpinion“但每次你以45000美元的价格购买比特币，就意味着有人拥有比特币，但却不买这些故事”
由于采矿，这一部分并不完全正确。

@ecommerceshares By demand destruction. But yes, blunt instrument indeed.

@按需销毁电子商务共享。但是，是的，的确是钝器。

@Unusual_Times @Zsaradancer @tia_loret @JevensenJevy Where are these levels defined?

@不寻常的时刻@zsaradiser@tia_loret@JevensenJevy这些级别是在哪里定义的？

@georgimarinov @cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 Current levels of infection are still, for now, low enough to pool 10. Still rising though, so this is ominous.

@georgimarinov@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431目前的感染水平仍然很低，足以聚集10人。但仍在上升，所以这是不祥的。

@georgimarinov @cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 Okay that's something other than what I thought it was. Never seen anything about it.

@georgimarinov@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431好吧，这和我想的不一样。从没见过这件事。

@georgimarinov @cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 Not sure what this means.

@georgimarinov@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431不确定这意味着什么。

@georgimarinov @cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 There have been reports out of China with sequencing, so they do use it. Not sure if it is being used in real time they way e.g. NZ was doing.

@georgimarinov@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431有来自中国的测序报告，所以他们确实使用了它。不确定它是否以新西兰的方式实时使用。

@ScenarioRosey @davidwdowdy @ContractJames @NEJM During the brief period of the study. Person-days is the more appropriate way to measure this than absolute risk over a fixed period.

@在短暂的研究期间，ScenarioRosey@DavidDowdy@ContractJames@NEJM。与固定期限内的绝对风险相比，人日是衡量这一风险的更合适的方法。

@geomade702 @Sophos_Veritate @BennettWoodman Price stability AND full employment. A huge asset crash will destroy employment.

@geomade702@Sophos_Veritate@Bennettwodman价格稳定和充分就业。巨大的资产崩溃将破坏就业。

@DonEford @michaelmina_lab It may only take a single viron to start an infection but the more virons there are, the more likely it is that one ends up attaching to one of your cells instead of sticking to a wall or something.

@DonEford@michaelmina_实验室可能只需要一个病毒子就可以开始感染，但病毒子越多，就越有可能附着到你的细胞上，而不是粘在墙上或其他东西上。

@cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 Obviously, 12 million a day would test 25.5 million in a little over two days. Biggest city in the world or not, these numbers don't add up.

@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431显然，每天1200万人将在两天多一点的时间里测试2550万人。不管是不是世界上最大的城市，这些数字加起来都不一样。

@cbn2 @BernieDogs4 @BNODesk @SheriD17536431 Why did it take 5 days to test half the city?

@cbn2@BernieDogs4@BNODesk@SheriD17536431为什么要花5天时间测试一半的城市？

@Mark38909618 @RadCentrism Transparent or not, China has not had much covid over the past two years. Easily verifiable by satellite observation of hospital traffic, from entry tests of travelers from China (Japan, in particular, has published this), etc.

@马克38909618@RadCentrism透明与否，中国在过去两年中没有多少新冠病毒。通过对医院交通的卫星观测、对来自中国（尤其是日本）的旅行者的入境测试等，很容易验证。

@juli_bg_bs Sort of. Vaccinated people may also be more cautious, and could also be healthier. In theory, also younger, but probably not that in practice. (Younger does appear to be the case in HK and China)

@juli_bg_有点像。接种疫苗的人也可能更谨慎，也可能更健康。从理论上讲，它也更年轻，但在实践中可能并非如此。（香港和中国似乎的确如此）