@notdustyrusty @Noahpinion Edit button isn't real.

@notdustyrusty@Noahpinion编辑按钮不是真的。

@GoldenRhino23 @lisa_iannattone Or that schools aren't crowded and poorly ventilated.

@GoldenRhino23@lisa_iannattone或学校不拥挤，通风不良。

@olga_basso @Gab_H_R She wasn't at the event, but happy to tell others to go.

@olga_basso@Gab_H_R她没有参加活动，但很高兴告诉其他人去。

@trading_noise @FiSurgi This is exactly right. He was quietly doing convertible bond arbitrage early on.

@交易噪音@FiSurgi这是完全正确的。他很早就在悄悄地进行可转换债券套利。

@jfeldman_epi @luckytran Similarly, requiring a negative rapid test was resisted allegedly due to limited availability of tests. They're widely available now, including for free.

@jfeldman_epi@luckytran同样，要求快速阴性检测的申请也因检测可用性有限而遭到拒绝。它们现在可以广泛使用，包括免费的。

@jfeldman_epi @luckytran https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jfeldman_epi@luckytranhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@valueterminal @FiSurgi @JoshOlawale He's always looked for VERY undervalued companies (and in recent years, rarely found them). You don't need precision for that. Envelope/mental calculation good enough.

@valueterminal@FiSurgi@JoshOlawale他一直在寻找价值被低估的公司（近年来很少找到）。你不需要精确。信封/心算足够好了。

@dankellyvo @justthefacts85 @Loretta_Torrago No, it doesn't appear to wane completely. 20% is significant but this is 20% occurring in 60-90% of the population, and often in an older, higher risk, portion of the population, so implies substantial protection, but not really close to 100%.

@dankellyvo@justthefact85@Loretta_Torrago不，它似乎没有完全消失。20%是重要的，但这是20%发生在60-90%的人口中，并且通常发生在年龄较大、风险较高的人群中，因此意味着大量的保护，但实际上并不接近100%。

@dankellyvo @justthefacts85 @Loretta_Torrago Numerous states and localities have been reporting around 20%. Here's a partial accounting, keeping in mind that with FL, NY, and TX missing, this is very incomplete.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@dankellyvo@justthefact85@Loretta_Torrago许多州和地方的报告率约为20%。这里是一个部分会计，请记住，由于FL、NY和TX缺失，这是非常不完整的。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@Bob_Wachter @ScottGottliebMD ^ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...

@Bob_Wachter@ScottGottliebMD^https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...

@Bob_Wachter @ScottGottliebMD Anecdote https://t.co/G93pfuRQ3k

@Bob_Wachter@ScottGottliebMD轶事https://t.co/G93pfuRQ3k

@TheAngryEpi She's not trained in public health.

@Angryepi她没有受过公共卫生方面的培训。

@DaleStearns @sleasor @UAWeapons Rate of fire completely different.

@DaleStearns@sleasor@ua武器的射速完全不同。

@TheFrugalBanker @J264B @sonalibasak The trucker package likely isn't all base either.

@Rugalbanker@J264B@sonalibasak的卡车司机套餐可能也不全是基本套餐。

@wabbit011235813 Followed

@wabbit011235813紧随其后

@myrabatchelder @darakass They also seem to false negative a lot with Omicron. It's likely timing related where if you retest later more likely to be positive but how many people do the rapid test, negative, "oh okay allergies" and don't test again?

@MyraBatcheld@darakass他们似乎对Omicron也有很多假阴性。这可能与时间有关，如果你以后重新测试，更可能呈阳性，但有多少人做了快速测试，呈阴性，“哦，好的，过敏”，然后不再测试？

@myrabatchelder How many PE deaths were not counted as covid deaths?

@Myrabatcheld有多少PE死亡不算新冠病毒死亡？

@qdurandmoreau @kprather88 @DrLeanaWenMD There's no difference.

@qdurandmoreau@kprather88@DrLeanaWenMD没有区别。

@alexmeshkin @Gab_H_R That is literally what they are doing.

@alexmeshkin@Gab_H_R这就是他们正在做的事情。

@paul_frucht @danaparish @DrLeanaWen Severe ACUTE illness. Long covid may turn out to be severe ultimately, and there is little to no data on how well vaccines protect against that.

@paul_frucht@danaparish@DrLeanaWen严重急性疾病。长期新冠病毒最终可能会变得很严重，关于疫苗对这种病毒的防护效果，目前几乎没有数据。