@mskathleenquinn @a_standal @JReinerMD The premise of unsafe air calls for intervention by government, businesses, and institutions, as does unsafe water. No one told the people of Flint that the water was unsafe but too bad, they were told it was safe, including famously Obama drinking some.
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...

@Kathleenquin@a_standal@jr女士认为不安全空气的前提要求政府、企业和机构进行干预，不安全的水也是如此。没有人告诉弗林特的人们，水是不安全的，但太糟糕了，他们被告知水是安全的，包括著名的奥巴马饮用水。
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...

@jklmd123 @AbraarKaran Many local areas do already recommend it, although no one pays much attention to recommendations. A few mandates may return.
https://6abc.com/philadelphia-...

@jklmd123@AbraarKaran许多地方都已经推荐了它，尽管没有人对推荐给予太多关注。一些授权可能会回归。
https://6abc.com/philadelphia-...

@LazarusLong13 Not a close contact according to CDC. In fact 2x not. Not close enough, not long enough.
This was in 2020 too. Pre-alpha.

@根据疾病预防控制中心的说法，拉扎鲁斯隆并不是亲密接触者。事实上不是。不够近，不够长。
这也是在2020年。阿尔法之前。

@KiddoCut @AnonymousLdb @BanFoolish It's not that they're planing to close to protect workers.
They're planning for too many workers to be out sick to keep a store open, but still generate revenue with a skeleton crew and curbside.

@KiddoCut@AnonymousLdb@bandouble他们并不是为了保护工人而打算关闭工厂。
他们计划让太多的工人因病外出，以维持商店的营业，但仍然通过骨干员工和路边创造收入。

@Chrisfs59 @LTrain18 @Bob_Wachter @UCSFHospitals People testing at home is irrelevant. They're testing a sample of the population going to the hospital for other reasons. Maybe they're a bit sicker than average or older than avg, but not likely to matter much. When their sample doubles it means something.

@Chrisfs59@LTrain18@Bob_Wachter@UCSFHospitals在家中进行人员测试与此无关。他们正在测试因其他原因去医院的人群样本。也许他们的病情比平均水平要严重一些，或者比平均年龄大一些，但这并不重要。当他们的样本加倍时，这意味着什么。

@Chrisfs59 @LTrain18 @Bob_Wachter @UCSFHospitals It's people in the hospital for other reasons getting tested, somewhat representative of the population, at least in relative terms (i.e. when it doubles, reasonable to believe pop has close to doubled). Who does or doesn't do home tests doesn't matter at all.

@Chrisfs59@LTrain18@Bob_Wachter@UCSFHospitals这是因为其他原因住院接受检测的人，至少在相对而言，在一定程度上代表了人群（即，当它翻倍时，有理由相信pop已经接近翻倍）。谁做或不做家庭测试根本不重要。

@zhang_yueting @Gab_H_R WH staff already does more than CDC guidance, for example, regular testing. However, on something highly visible like masking, they've decided not to.

@张跃婷@Gab_H_R WH的工作人员已经做了超过CDC指导的工作，例如定期检测。然而，对于一些高度可见的东西，比如掩蔽，他们决定不这么做。

@joaquinlife She just said a few days ago they do more than CDC guidance (which is obvious in any case)

@joaquinlife几天前她刚刚说，他们做的不仅仅是CDC的指导（这在任何情况下都是显而易见的）

@VGrubsky @Nutmeg031992 @JohnWest_JAWS @pragmatism_of @BallouxFrancois You're both confusing 'eliminated' with 'eradicated'.
Eliminated means lurking. Measles is 'eliminated' (in most places) but outbreaks happen when conditions are right.

@VGrubsky@nutmag031992@JohnWest_JAWS@practism_of@BallouxFrancois你们都把“消除”和“根除”混淆了。
消除意味着潜伏。麻疹（在大多数地方）已被“消灭”，但在条件合适的情况下会爆发。

@Nutmeg031992 @VGrubsky @JohnWest_JAWS @pragmatism_of @BallouxFrancois If R is close to 1 already with existing behavior and immunity, an uptick in immunity from increased spread of a more transmissible variant is enough to push it below 1 even with no behavior changes.
Assumes cross immunity of course, but there always seems to be at least some.

@肉豆蔻031992@VGrubsky@JohnWest_JAWS@practism_of@BallouxFrancois如果R在现有行为和免疫力方面已经接近1，那么对一种更易传播的变种的增加传播的免疫力的提高足以将其推到1以下，即使没有行为改变。
当然，假设存在交叉免疫，但似乎总有一些交叉免疫。

@PEARLfectChassi @arghavan_salles KF94 or boat style KN95 (be careful about fakes) are similar with ear loops. But be careful to make sure the fit is excellent or you are losing protection.

@PEARLfectChassi@arghavan_salles KF94或船型KN95（小心假货）与耳环类似。但要小心，以确保适合是极好的，否则你会失去保护。

@MelpomeneMel He said "at least two months and maybe longer". That's likely because the study ended at two months.

@他说“至少两个月甚至更长”。这可能是因为研究在两个月后结束。

@BernieDogs4 @ryanlcooper @chrislhayes https://twitter.com/EIFY/statu...

@BernieDogs4@ryanlcooper@chrislhayeshttps://twitter.com/EIFY/statu...

@MarvinH2_G2 https://twitter.com/steve_hank...

@马尔文2_G2https://twitter.com/steve_hank...

@EIFY @SDGovCrisis @EricTopol That's extremely interesting and not widely reported.

@EIFY@SDGovCrisis@EricTopol这非常有趣，而且没有被广泛报道。

@BernieDogs4 @ryanlcooper @chrislhayes The entire population of the country as a denominator is not really relevant when the most concentrated outbreaks are localized. Would have to look at cases per million just in Shanghai for example.

@BernieDogs4@ryanlcooper@chrislhayes当最集中的疫情发生在当地时，作为分母的全国人口实际上并不相关。以上海为例，我们必须考虑每百万例病例。

@DevilvTheDeepB1 @MackayIM There is definitely an element of deliberate disinformation, not just ignorance.

@Devilfthedeep1@MackayIM绝对有故意造假的成分，而不仅仅是无知。

@amcatanzaro @FleischmanSteve @DataDrivenMD @atrupar Pre-alpha and maybe even pre-D614G (which became dominant shortly after Wuhan).
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@amcatanzaro@FleischmanSteve@DataDrivenMD@atrupar Pre-alpha，甚至可能是Pre-D614G（在武汉之后不久成为主导）。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@downey @Bob_Wachter @UCSFHospitals Probably relatively undercounted due to more unreported self tests being used now.

@downey@Bob_Wachter@UCSFHospitals可能由于现在使用了更多未报告的自我测试而相对不足。

@LTrain18 @Bob_Wachter @UCSFHospitals His hospital test numbers circumvent the home testing issue.

@LTrain18@Bob_Wachter@UCSFHospitals他的医院检测号码绕过了家庭检测问题。