@loisrp @michaelmina_lab @CDCgov It never made sense that infecting other workers would help with workforce availability. If one worker comes back five days early and infects another worker (likely), that's another five sick days. Dog chasing its tail.

@loisrp@michaelmina_lab@CDCgov感染其他员工会有助于提高劳动力可用性，这是毫无道理的。如果一名员工提前五天回来并感染了另一名员工（很可能），那就是另外五天的病假。狗在追它的尾巴。

@chargrille @DGBassani @DrLeanaWen @PostOpinions It's motivated by hoping to kick the can past the next election.

@Chargrill@DGBassani@DrLeanaWen@postOperations它的动机是希望在下次选举中获胜。

@mskathleenquinn @MunsingLaw @AbraarKaran https://news.stanford.edu/2020... https://t.co/OemLPRaje2

@MsKathleenquin@MunsingLaw@AbraarKaranhttps://news.stanford.edu/2020...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/OemLPRaje2

@DaneLesch1 @AbraarKaran This study is pre-vaccines.

@DaneLesch1@AbraarKaran本研究为疫苗前研究。

@loisrp @mskathleenquinn @JimRosenthal4 @LazarusLong13 I would image lower nearby density probably helps somewhat.

@loisrp@mskathleenquin@JimRosenthal4@LazarusLong13我会想象附近较低的密度可能会有所帮助。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan Consider, to expand the court you need either a filibuster-proof trifecta (extremely rare) or at least a regular trifecta if willing to adjust rules (nuclear options).
There is no way to know when Republicans will ever have that. Might happen in 2024, might not for decades.

“DavidLaKaPropeMedidirasaN认为，为了扩大法院，你需要一个阻挠证明三分法（非常罕见）或至少一个常规三分法，如果愿意调整规则（核选项）。
没有办法知道共和党人什么时候会这样。可能发生在2024年，也可能不会持续几十年。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan "Makes sense" is vague I would agree.
But it is also clear you don't need *perpetual* effect to be worthwhile.
Republicans blocked a nominee for a year *without* being able to prevent Democrats from doing the same in the future (and gained from it)
A bird in the hand and such.

@David_LKaplan@mehdirhasan“有意义”是含糊不清的，我同意。
但也很明显，你不需要“永久”的效果才有价值。
共和党人在一年内阻止了一位提名人，却无法阻止民主党人在未来也这样做（并从中获益）
手里拿着一只鸟之类的。

@trengriffin Easy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

你的电子邮件
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@DWUhlfelderLaw @DrEricDing How many vote?

@DWUhlfelderLaw@drericing有多少票？

@arthur_affect Yes significant complications as I said.

@arthur_是的，正如我所说的，严重的并发症。

@arthur_affect This isn't quite true. Wellness incentives are allowed.
There may be significant complications, this particular program may be poorly designed, etc. but the concept isn't flat out prohibited.

@阿瑟：这不是真的。健康激励是允许的。
可能会有严重的复杂性，这个特定的程序可能设计得很糟糕，等等。但这个概念并不是完全禁止的。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan This is false.

@David_LKaplan@mehdirhasan这是假的。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan Or alternately, don't expand but make clear it is on the table and negotiate.
Taking it off the table as Democrats have done is self-defeating.

@David_LKaplan@mehdirhasan或其他人，不要扩张，但要明确它在谈判桌上，并进行谈判。
像民主党人那样把它从谈判桌上拿下来是弄巧成拙的。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan Didn't need to. And like I said, they did effectively expand it: Back to 9 under favorable conditions after holding it to 8 under unfavorable conditions.
Play all your cards, and negotiate to reform the process is the best way forward.

@David_LKaplan@mehdirhasan不需要这么做。就像我说的，他们确实有效地扩大了它：在有利条件下回到9，在不利条件下保持到8。
打好所有的牌，协商改革这个过程是最好的前进方式。

@David_LKaplan @mehdirhasan Republicans already shrunk the court to 8 and then expanded it to 9, and have recently stated they will do it again. That ship has sailed.
The best case would be negotiating longer term reform, but that only happens from a place of relative balance, not restraint on one side.

@David_LKaplan@mehdirhasan共和党人已经将法庭缩小到8个，然后扩大到9个，最近还表示他们将再次这样做。那艘船已经开航了。
最好的情况是谈判更长期的改革，但这只能在相对平衡的地方进行，而不是在一方进行克制。

@GochenourSharon @joaquinlife @TheAngryEpi @CDCgov Yes that's common. If you look at the tests they almost all have a bar code. If they're not being reported through an app it is because some policymaker decided they didn't want to know.

@GochenourSharon@joaquinlife@TheAngryEpi@CDCgov是的，这很常见。如果你看一下这些测试，它们几乎都有条形码。如果他们没有通过应用程序被报告，那是因为一些决策者决定他们不想知道。

@Gab_H_R Record low hospitalizations!
https://twitter.com/BNODesk/st...

@Gab_H_R创纪录的低住院率！
https://twitter.com/BNODesk/st...

@loisrp @JimRosenthal4 @LazarusLong13 When on the ground ventilation is often minimal, regardless of how many times Leana Wen or Joseph Allen writes about not needing masks on planes. You're on your own. Use a good mask and don't take it off.

@loisrp@JimRosenthal4@LazarusLong13当地面上的通风通常很少时，不管Leana Wen或Joseph Allen写了多少次飞机上不需要口罩。你只能靠自己了。使用好的口罩，不要摘下。

@Skogsfrun13 @TheAngryEpi @daveanthony @CDCgov Ugh, I'd rather not remember that.

@Skogsfrun13@TheAngryEpi@daveanthony@CDCgov，我宁愿不记得。

@jnordvig I don't recall the details but since Shanghai is 800km from Wuhan and measured varied across China, the lockdown likely wasn't particularly severe in 2020.

@jnordvig我不记得细节了，但由于上海距离武汉800公里，中国各地的测量结果各不相同，2020年的封锁可能并不特别严重。