@ChipotleChipot3 @hjelle_brian Why eat, you're only going to get hungry again?
Why treat a medical condition, you're still going to die?
This is maintenance of a low-infection rate in society. May or may not be worth it, but it not being a one-time magic bullet isn't a rational argument against.

@ChipotleChipot3@hjelle_brian为什么要吃东西，你只会再次挨饿？
为什么要治疗一种疾病，你还是会死？
这是在社会上保持低感染率。可能值得，也可能不值得，但不是一次性的灵丹妙药并不是一个合理的反对理由。

@j_g_allen (This was pre-alpha, BTW, several times less transmissible than what is circulating now.)

@j_g_allen（顺便说一句，这是在阿尔法之前，比现在流行的传播率低好几倍。）

@MissNicoletta I saw something recently that there was a deal for very limited funding. Not sure about the details.

@妮可莉塔小姐我最近看到一件事，那就是有一笔非常有限的资金交易。不确定细节。

@j_g_allen Not when you need to hydrate, eat, or take medicine during a long journey.
Industry airflow study concluded that leaving empty middle seats would cut risk in half, so clearly near-field transmission from a seat mate is significant even ventilation occurs some minutes later.

@在长途旅行中需要补充水分、进食或吃药时，j_g_allen不会这样做。
工业气流研究的结论是，让中间的座位空着可以将风险降低一半，所以很明显，即使几分钟后发生通风，来自同座人的近场传播也很明显。

@MissNicoletta Not surprised. Low supply due to funding running out (a month after Jeff Zients said they had all the funding they need; he's a "management" guy right?) was the stated reason for not making it available to <50.

@尼科莱塔小姐并不惊讶。由于资金不足，供应不足（一个月前，杰夫·齐恩斯说他们已经有了所需的所有资金；他是个“管理”人员，对吗？）未向<；50

@wsbgnl Reminder that this list of high risk conditions covers nearly the entire population.

@wsbgnl提醒大家，这份高风险疾病清单几乎覆盖了整个人群。

@Todd_Woodward @wsbgnl That'll probably change now that there is a deal for (extremely minimal) funding. There weren't enough booster doses paid for to make them available to more people so <50 high risk deemed disposable.

@Todd_Woodward@wsbgnl这一点可能会改变，因为现在有了一个（极低的）融资协议。没有支付足够的加强剂，无法让更多人使用，所以<；50高风险被认为是一次性的。

@FinchTH @jfeldman_epi Zero asbestos is impossible. You are only delaying the inevitable.

@FinchTH@jfeldman_epi Zero石棉是不可能的。你只是在拖延不可避免的事情。

@wirla88 @jklmd123 @DrLeanaWen @CDCgov @CDCDirector Agree

@wirla88@jklmd123@DrLeanaWen@CDCgov@CDCDirector同意

@james1chas3 @Craig_A_Spencer Nope, not statistically significant...
"p=0.051"
Best keep those antivirals sitting in the cabinet.

@james1chas3@Craig_A_Spencer不，没有统计学意义。。。
“p=0.051”
最好把那些抗病毒药物放在柜子里。

@wirla88 @jklmd123 @DrLeanaWen @CDCgov @CDCDirector That one is also looking a lot better than a few weeks ago
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wirla88@jklmd123@DrLeanaWen@CDCgov@cdcedirector这张照片看起来也比几周前好多了
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@BolognaFishMD @HistoryBoomer 18% of the entire population is close to enough of the base to tilt the policy positions of the Republican party. Indeed, that's a large part of what is going on.

@BolognaFishMD@HistoryBoomer 18%的人口接近足够的基础，足以倾斜共和党的政策立场。事实上，这是正在发生的事情的很大一部分。

@stewak2 @mllichti @kyle_ferriter @sinz54 @mattyglesias Doesn't look like the same magnitude at all.
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/mo...

@Studak2@mllichti@kyle_Ferrier@sinz54@mattyglesias看起来根本不一样。
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/mo...

@LukeDashjr @RepThomasMassie I don't know his max power output. The batteries themselves have very high output for short periods (needed to accelerate a heavy car at an insane rate) but his inverter, etc. less clear. But he doesn't need it because he uses chemical energy for hot water.

@LukeDashjr@RepThomasMassie我不知道他的最大输出功率。电池本身在短时间内有很高的输出（需要以疯狂的速度加速重型汽车），但他的逆变器等不太清晰。但他不需要它，因为他用化学能来制热水。

@LukeDashjr @RepThomasMassie He uses wood gas for hot water.

@他用木气做热水。

@Fish_Pimp @RepThomasMassie @PaulDVelasco21 Probably a lot longer. Telsa batteries are about 100 KWh I think, he's probably not using anything close to that per day so relatively few charge cycles.

@Fish_Pimp@RepThomasMassie@PaulDVelasco21可能要长得多。Telsa电池的电量约为100 KWh，我认为，他每天可能不会使用接近这个电量的电池，所以充电周期相对较少。

@LazarusLong13 @wsbgnl @DrEricDing You're not wrong. I pointed that out immediately when the "Community Levels" were revealed. Tried to reference my tweet but couldn't find it.

@LazarusLong13@wsbgnl@drericing你没有错。当“社区层面”被揭露时，我立即指出了这一点。试图引用我的推文，但找不到。

@DataDrivenMD Hard to see how a one month review is going to be sufficient to accomplish much if anything.

@DataDrivenMD很难看出一个月的审查如何足以完成很多工作。

@mllichti @kyle_ferriter @sinz54 @mattyglesias I mean, just as cherry picking peak waves to get high numbers would be bad, cherry picking lulls is also bad.
As I said, it is possible the next year and any or all future years may be different, but that's speculative. The past year is actual data.

@mllichti@kyle_Ferrier@sinz54@mattyglesias我的意思是，正如樱桃采摘峰值波浪以获得高数值是不好的，樱桃采摘间歇也是不好的。
正如我所说的，明年是可能的，未来的任何一年或所有年份都可能不同，但这是推测。过去一年是实际数据。

@mllichti @kyle_ferriter @sinz54 @mattyglesias I'm averaging over the year. Not just peak waves.

@mllichti@kyle_Ferrier@sinz54@mattyglesias我这一年的平均值。不仅仅是波峰。