@Melpearce @IgnoreRonPaul @estebs @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai I’m sorry but I personally think EVM support is a gimmick and like adding a floppy drive to a modern computer. Bridging tech for ibc is far more interesting 🧐 and would require eth contract to validate eos proofs.

@Melpearce@IgnoreRonPaul@estebs@ernst19947442@bigbardsamurai我很抱歉，但我个人认为EVM支持是一个噱头，就像给现代计算机添加软盘驱动器一样。ibc的桥接技术要有趣得多🧐 并要求eth合同验证eos证明。

@Quatemoc1975 @IgnoreRonPaul @estebs @Melpearce @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai @EosNFoundation @HelloTelos @Network_UX @WAX_io @B1 My criticism is designed to help and to educate. If it drives improvement then that is best for all.

@Quatemoc1975@IgnoreRonPaul@estebs@Melpearce@ernst19947442@BigBeardSamurai@eonfoundation@HelloTelos@Network\u UX@WAX\u io@B1我的批评旨在帮助和教育。如果它推动了改进，那么这对所有人来说都是最好的。

@GergelyOrosz Do you realize that “regulated” means controlled by the powers that be who routinely rob the masses of trillions of dollars they cannot afford to lose every year and are on the verge of destroying the world economy and reserve currency.

@GergelyOrosz你是否意识到“受监管”意味着受大国控制，这些大国每年都会掠夺数万亿美元，而这些美元是他们无法承受的，它们正处于摧毁世界经济和储备货币的边缘。

@estebs @Melpearce @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai Ok, now this is what I was looking for. Where can I learn more about how this works?

@estebs@Melpearce@ernst19947442@bigbardsamurai好的，这就是我要找的。我在哪里可以了解更多关于这项工作的信息？

@Melpearce @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai That is like claiming a virtual machine on your computer is a bridge to the internet. It may make some software compatible but it provides no network connectivity. A bridge to EVM is not a bridge to ETH. There are plenty of blockchains out there that have solid EVM compatibility

@Melpearce@ernst19947442@BigBeardSamurai这就像在你的计算机上声称一个虚拟机是通向互联网的桥梁。它可能使某些软件兼容，但不提供网络连接。通向EVM的桥梁不是通向ETH的桥梁。有很多区块链具有可靠的EVM兼容性

@Melpearce @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai None of those things are a bridge to ETH.

@Melpearce@ernst19947442@BigBeardSamurai这些东西都不是通往以太学院的桥梁。

@Melpearce @ernst19947442 @BigBeardSamurai By what metrics?

@Melpearce@ernst19947442@BigBeardSamurai采用什么指标？

@glue_doge @nsjames_ The best dapps provide enough value to bring users to what ever platform they choose to use.

@glue\u doge@nsjames\u最好的分布式应用程序提供了足够的价值，可以将用户带到他们选择使用的任何平台。

@Melpearce @Trim_Bot @bywirenews @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation By that logic anyone could form a company put the words EOS and Foundation/association/reserve/etc in the name and file a suit to get a bite at free settlement money. What, exactly, is the protection against double jeopardy under the various theories?

@Melpearce@Trim\u Bot@bywirenews@dani\u gurrl@eosnoundation根据这种逻辑，任何人都可以成立一家公司，在名称中加入EOS和Foundation/association/reserve等字样，并提起诉讼，以获得免费结算资金。在各种理论下，防止双重危险的保护究竟是什么？

@YetiXBT @Trim_Bot @bywirenews @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation It was accused but settled without any finding of fact in a court. SEC doesn’t have the power to declare something a security only to accuse and ask the courts.

@YetiXBT@Trim\u Bot@bywirenews@dani\u gurrl@eosnoundation它被指控，但在法庭上没有找到任何事实。证交会没有权力宣布某件事为证券，而只是为了指控和请求法庭。

@Trim_Bot @bywirenews @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation I’m saying for EOS holders to have standing they would need to declare themselves to be some kind of entity from the very beginning. It wouldn’t be changing the nature of EOS it would be community choosing to interpret history in a manner consistent with EOS always a security.

@Trim\u Bot@bywirenews@dani\u Gurrl@EOSNoundation我想说的是，EOS持有人要有地位，他们需要从一开始就声明自己是某种实体。这不会改变EOS的性质，而是社区选择以与EOS始终是安全一致的方式解释历史。

@Trim_Bot @bywirenews @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation If everyone loves the legal system so much and EOS sues b1 and they win then someone is given a big fat bank account with funds and fiduciaries responsibility to EOS holders and you basically have to argue EOS is a security and risk exchange delisting and full KYC.

@Trim\u Bot@bywirenews@dani\u Gurrl@EOS信息如果每个人都如此热爱法律体系，EOS起诉b1，他们赢了，那么有人会得到一个庞大的银行账户，资金和受托人对EOS持有人负责，你基本上必须辩称EOS是一个证券和风险交易所，退市和完全KYC。

@StauffelAcolyte @VitalikButerin @least_nathan Yes, colluding only has meaning from a subjective perspective and when looking at human interactions it isn’t obvious who is the traitor vs patriot. To give it more objective meaning you would need to assume the collaborative parties are doing so in breach of contract.

@StauffelAcolyte@VitalikButerin@least_nathan是的，勾结只有从主观角度来看才有意义，当看人类互动时，谁是叛徒和爱国者并不明显。为了给它更客观的含义，你需要假设合作各方这样做违反了合同。

@Trim_Bot @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation I’m not worried in the least. I’m more concerned about the negative impact on EOS.

@Trim\u Bot@dani\u Gurrl@EOSNoundation我一点也不担心。我更关心EOS的负面影响。

@Trim_Bot @dani_gurrrl @EosNFoundation You ignore the possibility that it might be ENF and or block producers that are forced to pay a settlement. This is a lose-lose situation to fight in courts.

@Trim\u Bot@dani\u Gurrl@EOSNoundation您忽略了可能是ENF和/或区块生产商被迫支付和解金的可能性。在法庭上打这场比赛是两败俱伤的。

@Melpearce @VitalikButerin @least_nathan Book is free, just pushing ideas that free mankind from tyranny

@Melpearce@VitalikButerin@least_nathan Book是免费的，只是推动了将人类从暴政中解放出来的思想

@VitalikButerin @least_nathan That said, my book More Equal Animals Proposes solutions to mitigate undesirable coordination by political parties to subvert the intended governing structures.

@VitalikButerin@least_nathan说的是，我的书《更平等的动物》提出了一些解决方案，以缓解政党为颠覆预期治理结构而进行的不必要的协调。

@VitalikButerin @least_nathan To sum it up in your own words… “collusion is *undesired* coordinating of other people.” It presupposes a value judgment because what is desired by some is undesirable by others. Political parties are collusion to control government. It isn’t wise to demonize collusion.

@维塔利克·巴特林（VitalikButerin）@least_nathan，用你自己的话来总结一下……“勾结是*不受欢迎的*协调他人。”它以价值判断为前提，因为有些人想要的东西，而另一些人不想要。政党相互勾结以控制政府。妖魔化勾结是不明智的。

RT: @_foxon_ @justinsuntron @btsfav @decryptmedia @bytemaster7 @CoinDesk Oh didn't you hear? We stole $50m from the DAO hacker by forking the DAO, $2b from miners by reducing mining issuance, $3b from ETH holders by increasing mining issuance by resetting the difficulty ice age, $18m by conducting the ETH sale, $2m by premining.....

转发：@@U foxon@justinsuntron@btsfav@decryptmedia@bytemaster7@CoinDesk哦，你没听到吗？我们通过分叉DAO从DAO黑客那里偷走了5000万美元，通过减少采矿发行从矿工那里偷走了20亿美元，通过重置冰河世纪的难度增加了采矿发行从ETH持有人那里偷走了30亿美元，通过进行ETH出售偷走了1800万美元，通过预采矿偷走了200万美元。。。。。

The design issues presented by Peterson would be mitigated by the design I had for ClarionOS which would not have allowed audience hijacking by replying to a celebrity. All information would flow along social paths only. https://twitter.com/thomashall...

彼得森提出的设计问题将通过我对单簧管的设计得到缓解，这将不允许观众通过回复名人来劫持。所有信息只会沿着社交途径流动。https://twitter.com/thomashall...