@StauffelAcolyte @VitalikButerin @least_nathan Yes, colluding only has meaning from a subjective perspective and when looking at human interactions it isn’t obvious who is the traitor vs patriot. To give it more objective meaning you would need to assume the collaborative parties are doing so in breach of contract.
@StauffelAcolyte@VitalikButerin@least_nathan是的，勾结只有从主观角度来看才有意义，当看人类互动时，谁是叛徒和爱国者并不明显。为了给它更客观的含义，你需要假设合作各方这样做违反了合同。