@QuantMario @VitalikButerin There is no way to know what code to run without asking a third party.

@QuantMario@VitalikButerin如果不询问第三方，就无法知道要运行什么代码。

@EdenEOS This article isn't "from me", but it does quote me a lot.

@这篇文章不是“来自我”，但它引用了我很多。

@gilesmanly @EdenEOS @VitalikButerin Wyoming DAO requires too much government approval and I am unclear how it provides better protection than an Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (UNA) which is recognized in ~20 states compared to 1. Wyoming DAO may be better ok for for-profit situations. /not legal advice

@gilesmanly@EdenEOS@VitalikButerin怀俄明州DAO需要太多政府批准，我不清楚它如何提供比非法人非营利协会（UNA）更好的保护，该协会在约20个州得到认可，而在1个州得到认可。怀俄明州DAO可能更适合营利情况/非法律意见

@DamelonBCWS @AvdiuSazan @hasufl Realize that I spent almost all my BTS to build BTS and what little was left was spent to build Steemit/Hive. I was just a few months away from having to go get a regular job. Steem had no ICO and could be mined by anyone on day 1.

@Dameloncbws@AvdiuSazan@hasufl意识到我几乎用了所有的基站来建立基站，剩下的一点钱都花在了建立基站上。我离找一份固定工作只有几个月了。Steem没有ICO，任何人都可以在第1天开采。

@DamelonBCWS @AvdiuSazan @hasufl PTS was a lesson learned in mining where the cost to acquire tokens was equal to the estimated market value and I had no money to compete. AGS generated donations worth about $3m which was spent on developers to the point I was almost bankrupt releasing BTS 1.0 and 2.0.

@DamelonBCWS@AvdiuSazan@hasufl PTS是采矿业的一个经验教训，在那里，获得代币的成本等于估计的市场价值，我没有钱竞争。AGS获得了价值约300万美元的捐款，这些捐款花在了开发商身上，直到我发布BTS 1.0和2.0时几乎破产。

RT: Clearly, California cannot be trusted when they tell you "your personal information will be protected." How many other institutions have told you that and you believed? With billions in resources, the mismanagement continues! https://twitter.com/michaeljbu...

RT：显然，当加利福尼亚告诉你“你的个人信息将受到保护”时，他们是不可信的有多少其他机构告诉过你这一点，而你却相信？拥有数十亿的资源，管理不善的情况还在继续！https://twitter.com/michaeljbu...

RT: @bytemaster7 @lex_node But regarding @bytemaster7's statement on the right to DAO property vs just holding the key(s) (as in a DAO multisig)... this seems to add-on to the common utterance "not your keys not your crypto (property)", hence if it is "your key", may still not be your crypto!

RT：@bytemaster7@lex\u节点，但考虑到@bytemaster7关于DAO属性权限的声明与只持有密钥的声明（如在DAO multisig中）。。。这似乎是“不是你的密钥不是你的加密（属性）”这句话的补充，因此，如果它是“你的密钥”，可能仍然不是你的加密！

@SalmusM Would you say that everyone at the farmer's market is interacting together and making money? Does that make all farmers a collective for-profit organization? The act of "talking" or "doing business with each other" does not an organization make.

@SalmusM你会说农贸市场的每个人都在一起互动赚钱吗？这是否使所有农民都成为一个集体盈利性组织？“交谈”或“相互做生意”的行为不是一个组织做出的。

@SalmusM Define "owned together" as in "copyright on the data"? Or is the data in the public domain? Does everyone "collectively own the servers" or are the servers the private property of individuals sharing information with one another? You need to be more precise.

@SalmusM将“共同拥有”定义为“数据版权”？或者这些数据属于公共领域？是每个人都“共同拥有服务器”，还是服务器是彼此共享信息的个人的私有财产？你需要更加精确。

RT: With the bZx DAO case @bytemaster7's post is important to everyone involved in a DAO.
Do a legal heath check and DYOR before creating or jumping into a #DAO.
https://fractally.com/blog/wha...

RT：对于bZx DAO案例，bytemaster7的帖子对涉及DAO的每个人都很重要。
在创建或跳入#DAO之前，请进行合法的健康检查和测试。
https://fractally.com/blog/wha...

@Jtrickeyrickey A mp3 is a number. What you own is the knowledge of which number to use, not the number itself.

@mp3是一个数字。你拥有的是使用哪个数字的知识，而不是数字本身。

@SalmusM @Jtrickeyrickey I guess that depends on whether you subscribe to copyright or trade secrets. If ownership is defined by control then you own your key until you lose control over it.

@SalmusM@Jtrickeyrickey我想这取决于你是订阅版权还是商业机密。如果所有权是由控制权定义的，那么您拥有您的密钥，直到您失去对它的控制为止。

@Jtrickeyrickey They own the keys 🔑 not the token.

@他们拥有钥匙🔑 不是令牌。

@virgin_gypsy If #ETH is going to transition to Proof of Stake and the Stake confers participation in governance and the tokens are considered property instead of opinion then the new proof-of-stake chain may be a new General Partnership separate and apart from the old Proof of Work org.

@维珍吉普赛如果#ETH将过渡到股权证明，且股权授予参与治理的权利，且代币被视为财产而非意见，那么新的股权证明链可能是一个新的普通合伙企业，与旧的工作证明组织分离。

@virgin_gypsy When you invest in something you give money to a company that is used to grow the business. When you speculate on something you buy the shares someone else is selling which is net-neutral to the business operation. No one can invest in #ETH "at this point".

@virgin\u吉普赛当你投资某件事时，你会把钱捐给一家用来发展业务的公司。当你投机时，你购买了其他人正在出售的股票，这对商业运营来说是净中性的。“目前”没有人可以投资于#ETH。

@EZJunior1020 The only thing I have created is open-source software that can be used by any number of unincorporated associations of people.

@EZJunior1020我唯一创建的是开源软件，它可以被任何数量的非法人团体使用。

The answer to this question may have serious ramifications for the legal status of DAOs on Etheruem.
https://fractally.com/blog/wha...

这个问题的答案可能会对DAO在Etheruem上的法律地位产生严重影响。
https://fractally.com/blog/wha...

Are ETH tokens property that can be stolen or merely the non-binding opinion of certain people?

ETH代币是可能被盗的财产还是仅仅是某些人的非约束性意见？

RT: With many lawsuits against specific #DAOs today, @bytemaster7 of @gofractally shares his concerns 🧐
"...one can accidentally form a partnership just by the manner in which you conduct business. Even without any written or oral agreements..."
#blockchain
https://bit.ly/DAOsLegalStatus

转发：gofractally的@bytemaster7今天针对特定的#DAO提起了许多诉讼，他也有同样的担忧🧐
“…一个人可以通过你开展业务的方式意外地建立伙伴关系。即使没有任何书面或口头协议…”
#区块链
https://bit.ly/DAOsLegalStatus

@jabba_mandel @VitalikButerin We don’t have any animosity we just have different priorities.

@jabba\u mandel@VitalikButerin我们没有任何敌意，我们只是有不同的优先级。