What #database can perform the most sequential random inserts per second and what are the numbers to support it? This is critical for #blockchain performance and efficiency and #Decentralization

什么#数据库每秒可以执行最连续的随机插入？支持它的数字是多少？这对于#区块链性能和效率以及#分散化至关重要

@DiarioBitcoin That is limited to coin based thinking and all sharding solutions ultimately sync to a central chain.

@仅限于基于硬币的思维的DiarioBitcoin和所有切分解决方案最终同步到中心链。

Only then, will hope to solve the root problem of economic and political independence that Bitcoin attempts to solve. It may take 50 years, but Bitcoin and all existing blockchains will succumb to those who have a natural monopoly over increasingly centralized infrastructure.

只有这样，才有希望解决比特币试图解决的经济和政治独立的根本问题。这可能需要50年，但比特币和所有现有区块链将屈服于那些对日益集中的基础设施拥有自然垄断权的人。

9) We need decentralized governance to prevent incumbents from using centralized control over naturally centralizing critical infrastructure from undermining the independence of community members.

9） 我们需要分散的治理，以防止现任者对自然集中的关键基础设施使用集中控制，从而破坏社区成员的独立性。

8) This is why we need @gofractally and why maturing to decentralization has been so elusive. Everyone is attempting to use technological means to overcome the laws of physics and economics when true decentralization requires new social structures to enable people to cooperate

8） 这就是为什么我们需要@gofractally，以及为什么分权的成熟如此难以捉摸。当真正的权力下放需要新的社会结构使人们能够合作时，每个人都在试图使用技术手段来克服物理学和经济学定律

7) Therefore, the goal is to decentralize the governance of the infrastructure that will, by information, physics, and economic theory, naturally and unavoidably centralize with scale.

7） 因此，我们的目标是分散基础设施的管理，通过信息、物理和经济理论，这些基础设施将自然且不可避免地集中在规模上。

6) The end game of all blockchains is incumbents with centralized infrastructure acting as gatekeepers as the barriers to entry tend to rise over time.

6） 所有区块链的最终游戏都是由中央基础设施的在位者充当守门员，因为进入壁垒往往会随着时间的推移而上升。

5) To reduce costs, most people get their data indirectly through brokers (API nodes) and these API nodes have the power to censor what they relay. Already happening with Eth NFT data.

5） 为了降低成本，大多数人通过代理（API节点）间接获取数据，这些API节点有权审查它们传递的内容。Eth NFT数据已经发生。

4) The bigger the blockchain state and bandwidth requirements and the longer a chain operates the fewer people can profitably maintain proximity to the data source.

4） 区块链状态和带宽要求越大，链运行的时间越长，能够保持接近数据源盈利的人就越少。

3) Therefore information will propagate to those with the closest economically incentivized connections first and the source of information has a natural monopoly on priority and pricing access to information.

3） 因此，信息将首先传播给那些具有最密切的经济激励关系的人，而信息来源对信息的优先权和定价具有自然垄断权。

2) it is impossible for everyone to be equally distant from this location and not equally economical for one node to send to all other nodes.

2） 不可能每个人都与该位置保持相同的距离，并且一个节点向所有其他节点发送数据也不可能同样经济。

1) events from decentralized sources appear in a different order from every point in space; therefore, events can only be sequenced in a centralized location, and sequencing is necessary for consensus.

1） 来自分散源的事件从空间中的每个点以不同的顺序出现；因此，事件只能在集中的位置排序，排序对于达成共识是必要的。

I've analyzed the physics and information theory and concluded that all information systems (e.g. #blockchain infrastructure and cryptocurrencies, #BTC, #EOS) must centralize at scale for energy, economic, and speed of light reasons. Read the thread for why it is inevitable. https://t.co/nL0u7sPRWy

我分析了物理和信息理论，并得出结论，出于能源、经济和光速的原因，所有信息系统（如区块链基础设施和加密货币、#BTC、#EOS）都必须在规模上集中。阅读帖子，了解为什么不可避免。https://t.co/nL0u7sPRWy

@EosNFoundation @HelloTelos @WAX_io @Network_UX @gofractally I hope the ENF successfully brings in new dev talent to the ecosystem, but doing so would require giving more time for people to become aware of the RFP and study the code enough to make an informed decision about deciding to bid and estimating the costs of the project.

@EONFoundation@HelloTelos@WAX\u io@Network\u UX@gofractally我希望ENF能成功地为生态系统带来新的开发人才，但这样做需要更多的时间让人们了解RFP并充分研究代码，以便在决定投标和估算项目成本方面做出明智的决定。

@EosNFoundation @HelloTelos @WAX_io @Network_UX This RFP is a formality and the timeline only makes sense for parties with advance warning and prior knowledge of the codebase. The only parties I know that have sufficient experience to do this work already work for the ENF, @gofractally, or OCI (already under contract).

@EONFoundation@HelloTelos@WAX\u io@Network\u UX此RFP是一种正式形式，时间线仅对提前警告和事先了解代码库的各方有意义。据我所知，唯一有足够经验完成这项工作的各方已经为ENF、@gofractally或OCI（已签订合同）工作。

@N3oshi @Jeff_Crypto2012 @themanyvip @wearecultdao The number is not relevant because there are not real identities. The more stakers the more rational ignorance. Obviously it would take more than 5 minutes on the website to fully understand, I’m just pointing out high level principles that are hard to escape.

@N3oshi@Jeff\u Crypto2012@themanyvip@wearecultdao由于没有真实身份，因此该号码不相关。赌注越多，理性的无知就越多。很明显，在网站上完全理解需要5分钟以上，我只是指出一些难以逃避的高层次原则。

@Jeff_Crypto2012 @N3oshi @themanyvip @wearecultdao There is a cost to review each proposal which scales with the number of proposals times the number of voters. This uncompensated cost is not sustainable and most people will not be able to respond fast enough.

@Jeff\u Crypto2012@N3oshi@themanyvip@wearecultdao审查每一项提案都有一笔费用，该费用随提案数量乘以选民数量而增加。这种未经补偿的成本是不可持续的，大多数人将无法做出足够快的反应。

@Jeff_Crypto2012 @N3oshi @themanyvip @wearecultdao Top 50 accounts is not the same as top 50 people. 80/20 rule says the top 25 account will likely belong to one person if they benefit by dividing their stake. I’ve looked at anonymous token weighted systems for years, they always have same problems expressed in different ways.

@Jeff\u Crypto2012@N3oshi@themanyvip@wearecultdao前50名客户与前50名客户不同。80/20规则表示，如果一个人通过分股受益，那么排名前25位的账户很可能属于一个人。多年来，我一直在研究匿名令牌加权系统，它们总是以不同的方式表达相同的问题。

@N3oshi @themanyvip @wearecultdao Token weighted voting is all I needed to see to know that whales will milk the token rather than grow its value. Absent fiduciary responsibility and individual accountability token weighted voting is not trustworthy. Only if centralized enough in well known hands, then SEC issues

@N3oshi@themanyvip@wearecultdao代币加权投票是我唯一需要看到的，我知道鲸鱼会榨取代币，而不是增加其价值。缺乏信托责任和个人责任令牌加权投票是不可信的。只有在知名人士手中足够集中的情况下，SEC才会发布

@themanyvip @N3oshi @wearecultdao With a name like cult…. After looking at their website I conclude they have a broken governance model dominated by Pareto. Their % fee on transfers is not competitive at scale and can be worked around. Very dangerous. Potentially subject to abuse by flash loans.

@themanyvip@N3oshi@wearecultdao，名字像cult…。在浏览了他们的网站后，我得出结论，他们的治理模式已经被帕累托主导。他们的%转会费在规模上没有竞争力，可以变通。非常危险。可能会被快速贷款滥用。