以太坊 的最新消息

RT: This was ETHBogotá! 🇨🇴
👩‍💻 1400 attendees
🗺 62 countries
🧩 212 projects
🌱 34% new to web3
🌎 31% from LATAM
With 900 hackers 🛠 overall, this was the biggest hackathon in Latin America ever!
👇 Enjoy our official recap video 📹 https://t.co/ewzuDgQ9tF

RT:这是 ETHBogotá! 🇨🇴
👩‍💻 1400 人参加
🗺 62 个国家
🧩 212 个项目
🌱 34% 的 web3 新手
🌎 31% 来自拉丁美洲
总共有 900 名黑客🛠,这是拉丁美洲有史以来最大的黑客马拉松!
👇 欣赏我们的官方回顾视频📹 https://t.co/ewzuDgQ9tF

发表时间:1年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

3. One important issue is that "crypto" means different things to different people.
To me, the core of "crypto" is the tech and mechanisms. ZK-SNARKs, BLS, auction models, x*y=k, quadratic funding... shape rotating all the way
Pairings literally use 12-dimensional curve twists! https://t.co/t89S1BzhXf

发表时间:2年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@vgr 同样的氛围😛
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

3. 一个重要的问题是“加密”对不同的人意味着不同的东西。
对我来说,“加密”的核心是技术和机制。 ZK-SNARKs、BLS、拍卖模型、x*y=k、二次融资……形状一路旋转
配对字面上使用 12 维曲线扭曲! https://t.co/t89S1BzhXf

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

deep learning vs crypto is a clear divide of rotators vs wordcels. the former offends theorycel aesthetic sensibilities but empirically works to produce absurd miracles. the latter is an insane series of nerd traps and sky high abstraction ladders yet mostly scams

发表时间:2年前 作者:roon @tszzl

@vgr 同样的氛围
https://mobile.twitter.com/tsz...

深度学习与加密是旋转器与字单元的明显区别。前者冒犯了理论上的审美敏感性,但在经验上却创造了荒谬的奇迹。后者是一系列疯狂的书呆子陷阱和天高的抽象梯子,但大多是骗局

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Announcing Supporters & Impact Booths @ Devcon!
This year’s Devcon in Bogotá is special in many ways. Two new additions this year include Impact Booths and and a Public Goods Supporters Program.
Read the full announcement here: https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...
And learn more below! 🧵

RT:宣布支持者

发表时间:1年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

@vrsvendsen1 @iyad_elbaghdadi Nah, ideally some democratic thing that bypasses governments entirely.

@vrsvendsen1 @iyad_elbaghdadi 不,理想情况下是完全绕过政府的民主事物。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@iyad_elbaghdadi Another question: is the global systemic importance of Twitter too high to allow the United States to control it?

@iyad_elbaghdadi 另一个问题:Twitter 的全球系统重要性是否太高,以至于美国无法控制它?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux minimalism = based

@pourteaux 极简主义 = 基于

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Aella_Girl This one was up there for me!
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...

@DeepCipher @shl @elonmusk Disparities in economic success between men and women are far larger once marriage+children enter the picture. Synthetic wombs would remove the high burden of pregnancy, significantly reducing the inequality.
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/...

发表时间:2年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@Aella_Girl 这个是给我的!
https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...

@一旦有了婚姻和孩子,男性和女性在经济成功方面的差距就会大得多。人造子宫将消除怀孕的高负担,显著减少不平等。
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/...

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@RalphEmmers @MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson Right but the Russian civilization meme has basically zero appeal to Ukraine now, and even before the war a majority wanted to be closer to the EU.
Maybe civilizationism is inherently appealing to centers but not to peripheries.

@RalphEmmers @MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson 是的,但俄罗斯文明模因现在对乌克兰的吸引力基本上为零,甚至在战争之前,大多数人都希望更接近欧盟。
也许文明主义天生就吸引中心而不是外围。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson One of the big flaws with it is lack of any game theory intuition. Voluntarily joining a tight coalition where another nearby country has 80% of the power is very dangerous - hence why periphery countries of other cultural spheres often huddle up to the US.

@MazMHussain @FelledMan @lndian_Bronson 它的一大缺陷是缺乏任何博弈论直觉。自愿加入另一个邻国拥有 80% 权力的紧密联盟是非常危险的——这就是为什么其他文化领域的外围国家经常与美国挤在一起的原因。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@6ix_smith @Noahpinion That's not a hack though, that's an attempted frontal assault on the underlying problem (rules that are actually really harmful, but have narratives about how they protect people that sound good)
But given how fast NIMBYism is falling, maybe it could be done!

@6ix_smith @Noahpinion 这不是黑客攻击,而是对潜在问题的正面攻击(实际上确实有害的规则,但有关于它们如何保护听起来不错的人的叙述)
但是考虑到邻避主义的下降速度有多快,也许可以做到!

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@MazMHussain @lndian_Bronson He was right about the presence of conflict, but very wrong on the details (eg. quite ironically the first section strongly asserts that a Ukraine vs Russia war is unlikely)

@MazMHussain @lndian_Bronson 他对冲突的存在是正确的,但在细节上却非常错误(例如,具有讽刺意味的是,第一部分强烈断言乌克兰与俄罗斯的战争不太可能发生)

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@MazMHussain Started reading Clash of Civilizations recently. 1/6 in, and so far it's feeling like the End of History (the book, not the meme) has aged much better

@MazMHussain 最近开始阅读《文明冲突》。 1/6 英寸,到目前为止,感觉就像历史的终结(书,而不是模因)已经老化了很多

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Noahpinion CC @elidourado have you by any chance thought about this issue?

@Noahpinion CC @elidourado 你有没有想过这个问题?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@kikstwitt @Noahpinion What's your favorite non-airplane air transit?

@kikstwitt @Noahpinion 你最喜欢的非飞机航空运输是什么?

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Noahpinion A possible legal hack to make (ii) easier would be to expand what charter flights are allowed to do, and keep the existing commercial flight system under the same rules.

@Noahpinion 使(ii)更容易的一个可能的法律黑客是扩大包机的允许范围,并将现有的商业飞行系统保持在相同的规则之下。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Noahpinion My heterodox take on US transit is that if infrastructure problems are too hard to solve, the transit of the future is airplanes, and we should just make airplanes better by (i) making them zero-carbon, and (ii) improving comfort by greatly cutting down airport security

@Noahpinion 我对美国过境的非正统看法是,如果基础设施问题太难解决,那么未来的过境就是飞机,我们应该通过(i)使其零碳和(ii)提高舒适度来让飞机变得更好通过大大减少机场安全

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@zengjiajun_eth I went to sleep at 8pm yesterday because I was tired.
Cultural valorization of neglect of health is dumb. It's not actually sustainable.

@zengjiajun_eth 我昨天晚上 8 点睡觉,因为我很累。
忽视健康的文化价值是愚蠢的。它实际上是不可持续的。

发表时间:1年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情