RT: We had so many great conversations about Semaphore at @EFDevcon, we decided to extend the deadline on the grants round😎
Applications will remain open until October 28. We can't wait to hear your ideas! https://twitter.com/PrivacySca...
RT：我们在@EFDevcon 就 Semaphore 进行了很多精彩的对话，我们决定延长资助回合的截止日期😎
申请将一直开放到 10 月 28 日。我们迫不及待地想听听您的想法！ https://twitter.com/PrivacySca...
RT: Account Abstraction is a genuine breakthrough for crypto. It's how we bring crypto to the masses.
But we know that it can be complicated, so here’s our attempt to make it more accessible by explaining 5 features enabled by AA that we’re currently working on…
RT：帐户抽象是加密货币的真正突破。这就是我们将加密带给大众的方式。
但我们知道它可能很复杂，所以我们试图通过解释我们目前正在开发的 AA 启用的 5 个功能来使其更易于访问……
Updated the doc on single slot finality:
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
更新了关于单槽确定性的文档：
https://notes.ethereum.org/@vb...
@tszzl /me looks up which ancient guy said that quote again..... oh.
@tszzl /me 再次查找哪个古人说过这句话.....哦。
@tszzl I take it "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools" doesn't appeal to you?
@tszzl 我认为“将其学者与战士分开的社会将由懦夫完成其思想，由傻瓜完成其战斗”对您没有吸引力吗？
@MacaesBruno Longyearbyen?
@MacaesBruno 朗伊尔城？
RT: Why is everybody silent on this??? https://twitter.com/zengjiajun...
RT：为什么每个人都对此保持沉默？？？ https://twitter.com/zengjiajun...
RT: The blue check VB scam is out of control. Can @TwitterSafety do something?
RT：蓝支票 VB 骗局已经失控。 @TwitterSafety 可以做点什么吗？
@primalpoly Is this good or bad?
(imo it's irrelevant, as we're gonna replace evolutionary pressures with intentional gene selection within a century anyway unless brain uploading gets there first)
@primalpoly 这是好还是坏？
（imo这无关紧要，因为无论如何我们将在一个世纪内用有意的基因选择取代进化压力，除非大脑上传首先到达那里）
A quick note on upgrading from KZG to STARKs in danksharding. Probably the right thing to do in ~3-6 years when the tech becomes more mature!
https://ethresear.ch/t/arithme... https://t.co/qkUFPMTN5I
关于在 danksharding 中从 KZG 升级到 STARKs 的快速说明。当技术变得更加成熟时，可能在 3-6 年内做正确的事情！
发表时间：1年前 作者：Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情
RT: 1/ Many foreigners were scared to come, but I strongly believe it’s important for builders to go out there and see all different parts of the world they are trying to change. We will keep trying to challenge and surprise you. https://t.co/zOyvucE07j
RT：1/ 许多外国人都不敢来，但我坚信，对于建设者来说，走出去看看他们试图改变的世界各个不同的地方是很重要的。我们将继续努力挑战并给您惊喜。 https://t.co/zOyvucE07j
Convex-natalism: the ideology that regardless of your opinions on how many children people should have on average, more people should have either 0 or 5+ children and fewer people should have 2. https://t.co/jGfsqKtPbO
凸出生论：不管你对人们平均应该有多少孩子的看法，更多的人应该有 0 个或 5 个孩子，而更少的人应该有 2 个孩子。 https://t.co/jGfsqKtPbO
@terencechain @vdWijden It would be cool to spec this out and at least try it, to see how reliable this kind of mempool scanning is, and how often such inclusion failures happen "accidentally"
@terencechain @vdWijden 明确这一点并至少尝试一下会很酷，看看这种内存池扫描有多可靠，以及这种包含失败“意外”发生的频率
@terencechain @vdWijden Next step: proposer locally scans the mempool and checks if there are any txs that pay a sufficient prio fee but have not been included in >= 3 non-full blocks. If so, proposer always favors local block if the builder block does not include all those txs.
@terencechain @vdWijden 下一步：提议者在本地扫描内存池并检查是否有任何支付了足够的优先费用但尚未包含在其中的 tx
RT: The talk I did @EFDevcon and @schellingpoint_ in Bogotá focuses on how to build DVPs today and their importance to prevent context collapse.
Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
This is joint work with @glenweyl @yorkerhodes @backaes @divyasiddarth. https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
RT：我在波哥大的@EFDevcon 和@schellingpoint_ 的演讲重点是如何构建当今的 DVP 以及它们对防止上下文崩溃的重要性。
在此处观看：发表时间：1年前 作者：Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情
ok what have I done https://twitter.com/VitalikBut... https://t.co/EkEjNROr9X
Someone should make a project called "THE Protocol", so that their shills can say "Look, soandso mentioned THE!" pretty much any time anyone says anything.
发表时间：1年前 作者：vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin好的，我做了什么 https://twitter.com/VitalikBut... https:// t.co/EkEjNROr9X
有人应该做一个名为“THE Protocol”的项目，这样他们的shills就可以说“看，soandso提到了THE！”几乎任何时候有人说什么。
@phildaian @koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState If it decreases revenue by 5%, that's only ~0.5% per year, which would take ~139 years to halve the offender's stake
@phildaian @koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState 如果它将收入减少 5%，那每年只有约 0.5%，这需要约 139 年才能将违规者的股份减半
@jon_day2 https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
@jon_day2 https://vitalik.ca/general/202...
@koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState Sorry, meant to add a comma between "No" and "validators", hope people understood it that way (don't have the edit thing yet)
@koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState 抱歉，意思是在“否”和“验证者”之间添加一个逗号，希望人们这样理解（还没有编辑的东西）
@koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState No validators doing active curation is not the goal at all. It's more a question of what level of response is appropriate to what level of transgression.
@koeppelmann @latetot @TrustlessState 没有验证者进行主动管理根本不是目标。更多的是一个问题，即何种程度的反应适合于何种程度的违法行为。