以太坊 的最新消息

@chengdoo It is true that the welfare of the group is equal to the sum of the welfare of all individuals.
But that doesn't mean that the action that maximally benefits some individual is necessarily an action that does well at benefiting the whole group.

发表时间:3分钟前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@MacaesBruno @gladstein They actually go considerably further than I do on this!
https://www.wired.com/story/op...

@麦克斯布鲁诺@格拉德斯坦他们实际上比我在这方面走得更远!
https://www.wired.com/story/op。。。

发表时间:34分钟前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@MacaesBruno @gladstein There's different kinds of technology. You said above you're primarily bullish on AI. Glen/Jaron's article is arguably bearish on AI. https://t.co/wVbQo6XZnJ

@MacaesBruno@gladstein有不同的技术。你上面说你主要看好人工智能。格伦/杰伦的文章可以说是看跌了人工智能。https://t.co/wVbQo6XZnJ

发表时间:35分钟前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@chengdoo You really think everyone talking about public goods is doing so because they have an anti-freedom agenda?
I mean, sure, you can have that model of the world, but I don't think it's a very correct or useful one.

@你真的认为每个谈论公共物品的人这么做是因为他们有反自由的议程?
我的意思是,当然,你可以拥有这个世界的模型,但我认为这不是一个非常正确或有用的模型。

发表时间:1小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

I really like liberty and freedom but defining the collective common good as some kind of enemy is just weird. https://twitter.com/EWErickson...

Just don’t think we can ever define conservatism as “common good” because conservatism is about liberty and freedom of the individual. It is the support of the individual against the collective common good.

发表时间:23小时前 作者:Erick Erickson @EWErickson

我真的很喜欢自由和自由,但是把集体的共同利益定义为某种敌人是很奇怪的。https://twitter.com/EWErickson。。。

只是不要认为我们可以把保守主义定义为“共同利益”,因为保守主义是关于个人自由和自由的。它是个人对集体共同利益的支持。

发表时间:1小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

See also: this mini thread
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit...

So the "individualism vs collectivism" dichotomy sometimes puzzles me. I often see the two words used in two senses:
1. Individualism = individual freedom, collectivism = mutual restraint
2. Individualism = caring only about yourself, collectivism = caring about common good...

发表时间:2年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

另请参见:此迷你线程
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit。。。

所以“个人主义对集体主义”的两分法有时让我困惑。我经常看到这两个词有两种用法:
一。个人主义=个人自由,集体主义=相互约束
2。个人主义=只关心自己,集体主义=关心共同利益。。。

发表时间:1小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

RT: The latest Lighthouse development update is out! Featuring:
- Stable public testnet
- Eth2 spec bug
- Upgrade to spec v0.11
- Another 3x syncing speed improvement
- Multi-client testnet effort
We hope you're all safe and healthy!
https://lighthouse.sigmaprime....

RT:最新的Lighthouse开发更新已经发布!具有以下功能:__-稳定的公共测试网_- Eth2规范错误_-升级到规范v0.11_-另一个3倍的同步速度改进_-多客户端测试网的作用____我们希望你们都安全健康!__ https://lighthouse.sigmaprime ....

发表时间:3小时前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum

@VladZamfir @MikeBucella Is USD money?

@VladZamfir@MikeBucella是美元吗?

发表时间:5小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@patrissimo Audio chat for ~1 hour every week.
We also have permanent telegram and discord chats for each topic

@帕特里西莫每周约1小时的音频聊天。
每一个话题我们都有固定的电报和不和谐的谈话

发表时间:6小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@VladZamfir What if BSV is the real Tron?

@如果BSV是真正的Tron呢?

发表时间:6小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@andrej_muzevic @VladZamfir I was looking at that tweet from afar and interpreted 🙊 as 💩 at first. That made me..... soo confused.

@安德烈·穆泽维奇@VladZamfir我远远地看着那条推文🙊 作为💩 一开始。这让我。。。。。苏糊涂了。

发表时间:6小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@VladZamfir So you like EIP 960?

@弗拉扎姆菲尔,你喜欢EIP960?

发表时间:8小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

@DrBitcoinMD @zackvoell @Daniel_Jourdan https://t.co/SdVk2Qlzns

@drbitconumd@zackvoell@daniel@u jourdan https:///t.co//sdvk2qlzns

发表时间:8小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

RT: New Eth2.0 specs release!
Read the changelog:
https://github.com/ethereum/et...
#ethereum #eth2

新的Eth2.0规范发布!
读取更改日志:
https://github.com/ethereum/et。。。
#以太坊

发表时间:8小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

RT: Hello world! We’re the @Ethereum Foundation’s Ecosystem Support Program (formerly the Grants Program), and beginning today we’re online to interact with the #Ethereum ecosystem, and to help expand our reach.

转发:你好,世界!我们是@Ethereum基金会的生态系统支持计划(以前称为赠款计划),从今天开始,我们在线与#Ethereum生态系统互动,帮助扩大我们的覆盖范围。

发表时间:9小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

Check out and follow the #Ethereum Foundation's Ecosystem Support Program, and be sure to dig into the latest allocation update below!
https://blog.ethereum.org/2020... https://twitter.com/EF_ESP/sta...

Hello world! We’re the @Ethereum Foundation’s Ecosystem Support Program (formerly the Grants Program), and beginning today we’re online to interact with the #Ethereum ecosystem, and to help expand our reach.

发表时间:9小时前 作者:EF Ecosystem Support Program @EF_ESP

查看并遵循以太坊基金会的生态系统支持计划,并确保深入了解下面的最新分配更新!
https://blog.ethereum.org/2020。。。https://twitter.com/EF_ESP/sta。。。

你好,世界!我们是@Ethereum基金会的生态系统支持计划(以前称为赠款计划),从今天开始,我们在线与#Ethereum生态系统互动,帮助扩大我们的覆盖范围。

发表时间:9小时前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum

@krzhang @sigfpe I think it's a style of thinking as much as it is a language!

@krzhang@sigfpe我认为这是一种思维方式,也是一种语言!

发表时间:10小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin

RT: I get the feeling many non-mathematicians think mathematics would be easy if only it was translated out of mathematical notation.
I get the feeling many mathematicians think every other subject would be easy if only it was translated into mathematical notation.

RT:我有一种感觉,许多非数学家认为,只要把数学从数学符号中翻译出来,数学就容易了。
我有一种感觉,许多数学家认为,只要把其他学科翻译成数学符号,其他学科都会很容易。

发表时间:10小时前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin