@ChrisLundkvist Ok wow did I just automatically use "physical" to mean "not electronic", as though ebikes are some kind of teleporter?
Oops. Oh well, you know what I mean.

@ChrisLundkvist好吧哇我只是自动使用“物理”来表示“非电子”，好像电动自行车是某种传送器？
哎呀。哦，好吧，你知道我的意思。

@ChrisLundkvist Moralizing about physical bikes vs ebikes seems like a huge error, classic "perfect is the enemy of the good" situation.
And I think physical bikes are still the default type of bike in the public consciousness, so better to deliberately say ebike.

@ChrisLundkvist 对实体自行车与电动自行车进行道德化似乎是一个巨大的错误，经典的“完美是美好的敌人”的情况。
而且我认为实体自行车仍然是公众意识中默认的自行车类型，所以最好故意说电动自行车。

@ChrisLundkvist Switching gas car -> electric car solves pollution, but does nothing for congestion.
Switching car -> any type of bike/scooter solves congestion.
I think ebikes are more practical because regular bikes are just a little bit not convenient enough (eg. very hard to go up slopes)

@ChrisLundkvist 切换汽油车 -

RT: 1/ In my @ethlatam keynote, I called Buenos Aires a city of passion and hope, and I certainly saw it with my eyes
🙏 @pauDoy @cryptochica_arg @rrodriguezpilar @fiorescan @0xkobol volunteers, ladies, local teams I met. You made my visit not only wonderful, but also meaningful https://t.co/OjbX9LD0fj

RT：1/ 在我的@ethlatam 主题演讲中，我称布宜诺斯艾利斯是一座充满激情和希望的城市，我当然是亲眼看到的
🙏 @pauDoy @cryptochica_arg @rrodriguezpilar @fiorescan @0xkobol 志愿者，女士们，我遇到的当地团队。您让我的访问不仅精彩，而且有意义 https://t.co/OjbX9LD0fj

@KarenWa74383687 因为我觉得pos比pow更好?
我不是魔鬼，我是乌龟😋

@KarenWa74383687 因为我觉得pos比pow更好？
我不是魔鬼，我是乌龟😋

@mnolangray Don't we kinda have that because of how many key UN bodies (eg. UNSC) have a superlinear representation curve where small countries get no say at all?

@mnolangray 我们不是因为有多少关键的联合国机构（例如联合国安理会）有一个超线性的代表曲线，而小国根本没有发言权吗？

@TrustlessState XRP already lost their right to protection when they tried to throw us under the bus as "China-controlled" imo:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@TrustlessState XRP 当他们试图将我们作为“中国控制”的 imo 扔到公共汽车下时，他们已经失去了保护权：
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

RT: Open-source development is in danger. Take action before it’s too late! - Sign the Petition! https://chng.it/yQr8V5Cg via @ChangeGER

RT：开源开发处于危险之中。在为时已晚之前采取行动！ - 签署请愿书！ https://chng.it/yQr8V5Cg 通过@ChangeGER

Incidentally, reminder that I oppose banning PoW:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

顺便提醒一下，我反对禁止 PoW：
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

Glad to see Ethereum people pushing against regulations that privilege ETH over other legitimate cryptocurrencies.
(I have not dug into the details of what specifically is going on and to what extent it's a gov thing vs a compliance decision of one business, but either way...) https://twitter.com/TrustlessS...

很高兴看到以太坊人反对将 ETH 置于其他合法加密货币之上的法规。
（我还没有深入了解具体情况以及在多大程度上这是政府的事情与一个企业的合规决定，但无论哪种方式......）https://twitter.com/TrustlessS...

@dsallentess And quadratic funding is all about creating a representative power-to-act.

@dsallentess 二次融资就是要创造一个有代表性的行动权。

@dsallentess And I'd say ideas like Harberger taxes are intended to be right in that quadrant. They're intentionally dropping the idea that people have the right to have things stay some way just because they always have been, but they don't really sacrifice representativeness per se.

@dsallentess 而且我想说像 Harberger 税这样的想法旨在适合该象限。他们故意放弃人们有权让事情保持某种状态的想法，因为他们一直都是这样，但他们并没有真正牺牲代表性本身。

@dsallentess So if representation vs technocracy, and power-to-act vs power-to-prevent, are different axes, you can have a system with high representation with more of a power-to-act orientation (or some balance in the middle).

@dsallentess 因此，如果代表权与技术统治、权力行动与权力预防是不同的轴，那么您可以拥有一个具有高代表权的系统，具有更多的权力行动导向（或中间的某种平衡） ）。

@dsallentess Web2 of course is the opposite, traditionally valuing power-to-act much more highly, and web3/crypto has a mix of both.
(And so crypto ends up attracting people of both temperaments)

@dsallentess Web2 当然是相反的，传统上更重视行动能力，而 web3/crypto 两者兼而有之。
（因此加密货币最终吸引了两种气质的人）

@dsallentess "Representation just causes vetocracy" because representation is subliminally being *defined* as power-to-prevent.
Basically, there's a branch of progressivism that values power-to-prevent much more highly than power-to-act.

@dsallentess“代表只是导致否决权”，因为代表在潜意识中被*定义*作为预防的权力。
基本上，进步主义的一个分支更重视预防的权力，而不是行动的权力。

@dsallentess I think one axis in progressivism that shines through clear in your text but no one is talking about is risk tolerance (another frame: are we "minimizing harm" or "maximizing awesomeness"?)
The "defensive" frame is really deeply embedded esp in Chellam's quotes: https://t.co/PZD2ubWI2i

@dsallentess我认为进步主义的一个轴在你的文本中清晰地闪耀，但没有人在谈论风险承受能力（另一个框架：我们是“最小化伤害”还是“最大化敬畏”？）
“防御性”框架确实深深嵌入在 Chellam 的引语中：https://t.co/PZD2ubWI2i

@dsallentess This is fascinating!

@dsallentess 这太迷人了！

Looks like there's going to be a web3 hackathon in Kyiv early next month.
These people are brave! 🇺🇦🇺🇦👍
(There's a remote option for people not local to the area as well) https://twitter.com/KyivTechSu...

看起来下个月初将在基辅举办 web3 黑客马拉松。
这些人很勇敢！ 🇺🇦🇺🇦👍
（该地区以外的人也有一个远程选项）https://twitter.com/KyivTechSu。 ..

@ercwl fwiw I voted X in your above poll

@ercwl fwiw 我在您的上述民意调查中投了 X

RT: EFF is deeply concerned that the U.S. Treasury Department has included an open source computer project, Tornado Cash, on its list of sanctioned individuals. Tornado Cash is an open source software project and website that published a decentralized cryptocurrency mixer.

RT：EFF 对美国财政部将开源计算机项目 Tornado Cash 列入其受制裁个人名单深表担忧。 Tornado Cash 是一个开源软件项目和网站，发布了一个去中心化的加密货币混合器。