@Nowooski Started to appreciate how public narrative is a key deciding factor in many kinds of large-scale situations (I think before I would have said "incentives plus random noise")

@Nowooski 开始意识到公共叙事是如何在多种大规模情况下成为关键决定因素（我想在我说“激励加上随机噪音”之前）

@Nowooski This in turn made me realize that "limits to financialization" are in some cases needed and unavoidable:
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@Nowooski 这反过来又让我意识到“金融化的限制”在某些情况下是必要且不可避免的：
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@Nowooski Coordination and uneven limits to coordination (and collusion) as a key frame for thinking about political issues.
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@Nowooski 协调和不平衡的协调（和勾结）限制是思考政治问题的关键框架。
https://vitalik.ca/general/202...

@Nowooski The sane version of degrowth is "virtual consumption can substitute physical consumption and this is good for the environment and other reasons", and I'm sympathetic to this, but physical resource consumption per capita is *already* declining in developed countries. https://t.co/Te9WqRMtO2

@Nowooski 理智的退化版本是“虚拟消费可以替代物质消费，这对环境和其他原因都有好处”，我对此表示同情，但发达国家的人均物质资源消耗*已经*下降。 https://t.co/Te9WqRMtO2

@Nowooski Actually, the phrase "anti-civilization" as a moral criticism is not something I would have said 10 years ago.

@Nowooski实际上，作为道德批评的“反文明”一词不是我10年前会说的。

@Nowooski Moved from seeing "degrowth" as a well-intentioned idea that gets some things right and other things wrong to viewing it as deeply confused at best, and horrific and anti-civilization at worst.
https://twitter.com/PunishedLi...

@Nowooski 从将“退化”视为一个善意的想法，它使某些事情正确而另一些事情错误，而将其视为充其量是深深的困惑，最坏的情况是可怕和反文明。
https://twitter.com/PunishedLi...

@ArturoGentili @BrankoMilan As far as I can tell US prestige dropped a lot post-Iraq, it just started from an incredibly high point.

@ArturoGentili @BrankoMilan 据我所知，在伊拉克之后，美国的声望下降了很多，它刚刚从一个令人难以置信的高点开始。

@ArturoGentili @BrankoMilan World reaction to USA invasion of Iraq was strong, no? I remember growing up in Canada hearing stories about Americans wearing clothing with Canadian flags to try to escape dirty looks wherever they travel.

@ArturoGentili @BrankoMilan 世界对美国入侵伊拉克的反应很强烈，不是吗？我记得我在加拿大长大，听说过美国人穿着带有加拿大国旗的衣服，试图在他们旅行的任何地方逃避肮脏的外表的故事。

@gatnash I suspect guides for this are going to get much better over the next year.

@gatnash 我怀疑这方面的指南在明年会变得更好。

@gatnash The biggest nuance in the science is figuring out 222 vs 254 nm stuff (222 seems better but so far more expensive), and deployment strategies that maximize exposure to viruses in the air while minimizing exposure to humans.

@gatnash 科学中最大的细微差别是弄清楚 222 与 254 nm 的东西（222 似乎更好，但到目前为止更贵），以及最大限度地暴露于空气中的病毒同时最大限度地减少暴露于人类的部署策略。

@gatnash Of course the most effective way to deploy it is in public spaces. As an immunocompromised (or just covid-hawkish in general) person one could just buy a portable lamp and take it out everywhere...

@gatnash 当然，最有效的部署方式是在公共场所。作为一个免疫功能低下（或者只是一般意义上的鹰派）的人，你可以买一盏便携式灯，然后把它带到任何地方……

@gatnash I'm in touch with people really actively working on it. Definitely many not-good reasons delaying it like "politics is never proactive" and understandable frustration over mask mandates spilling over into "let's forget covid entirely" mentality, plus the usual bioconservatism...

@gatnash 我与真正积极致力于此的人保持联系。肯定有很多不好的理由推迟它，比如“政治从不积极主动”，以及对面具授权的沮丧情绪蔓延到“让我们完全忘记covid”的心态，再加上通常的生物保守主义......

@gatnash By "medically" you mean specialized applications in hospitals etc, or "why aren't we putting UVC lamps in every room since last year?"

@gatnash“医学上”是指医院等的专业应用，或者“为什么我们不从去年开始在每个房间都安装 UVC 灯？”

RT: @FWNietz @BrankoMilan Sometimes nuance is a needed corrective to extremist simplicity, but sometimes nuance is a DoS attack, obscuring our ability to recognize and agree on truths that are really important and actually quite simple.
This is the most important nuance about nuance.

RT：@FWNietz @BrankoMilan 有时细微差别是对极端简单性的必要纠正，但有时细微差别是一种 DoS 攻击，它掩盖了我们识别和同意非常重要且实际上非常简单的事实的能力。
这是关于细微差别的最重要的细微差别。

@FWNietz @BrankoMilan Sometimes nuance is a needed corrective to extremist simplicity, but sometimes nuance is a DoS attack, obscuring our ability to recognize and agree on truths that are really important and actually quite simple.
This is the most important nuance about nuance.

@FWNietz @BrankoMilan 有时细微差别是对极端简单性的必要纠正，但有时细微差别是一种 DoS 攻击，它掩盖了我们识别和同意非常重要且实际上非常简单的事实的能力。
这是关于细微差别的最重要的细微差别。

@michael_nielsen @BrankoMilan Suficiently extreme human rights violations too (eg. actively ongoing govt-organized mass murder), also with a high bar for both evidence and scale, and with the caveat that "justified" does not by itself imply "wise"

@michael_nielsen @BrankoMilan 也足够极端的侵犯人权行为（例如，积极进行的政府组织的大规模谋杀），证据和规模也有很高的标准，并且需要注意的是“正当”本身并不意味着“明智”

@michael_nielsen @BrankoMilan None of my principles have literally infinite weight, there's always possible extenuating factors that can justify something by default bad.
Eg. I'd support invading a country actively building and planning to release world-destroying bioweapons (high bar for evidence though)

@michael_nielsen @BrankoMilan 我的任何原则都没有真正的无限分量，总是有可能的情有可原的因素可以证明默认情况下某些事情是不好的。
例如。我会支持入侵一个积极建设并计划释放毁灭世界的生物武器的国家（尽管证据的门槛很高）

@BrankoMilan I condemn it as a violation of the "invading people is bad" rule. This rule exists regardless of what the UN says, and regardless of whom the UN considers to be a country.

@BrankoMilan 我谴责它违反了“入侵的人是坏的”规则。无论联合国怎么说，无论联合国认为谁是一个国家，这条规则都存在。

@RyanSAdams https://blog.ethereum.org/2016...

@RyanSAdams https://blog.ethereum.org/2016...

@SchmollRyan @theCryptosopher I don't oppose people having guns, though I also don't think they're particularly effective as some kind of bulwark of freedom in the 21st century. Enshrining and strengthening privacy tech is a much better focus.

@SchmollRyan @theCryptosopher 我不反对人们拥有枪支，尽管我也不认为它们作为 21 世纪的某种自由堡垒特别有效。尊重和加强隐私技术是一个更好的焦点。