@theCryptosopher Can you point to specific non-libertarian views I have that you disagree with?

@theCryptosopher 你能指出我不同意的特定的非自由主义观点吗？

@delzennejc @Nowooski I honestly really miss smartphones with physical keyboards. I remember my typing speed 10y ago with a physical keyboard phone being significantly higher than what I can accomplish today.

@delzennejc @Nowooski 老实说，我真的很想念带有物理键盘的智能手机。我记得 10 年前我使用物理键盘手机的打字速度明显高于我今天所能达到的速度。

Regular reminder to people trying to make things better:
It is not your responsibility to solve every problem.

定期提醒那些试图让事情变得更好的人：
解决所有问题不是您的责任。

@Nowooski Eh, I do think "designers keep trying to force touchscreens on us claiming they are 'sleek' but in reality physical buttons are sooo much better" is a pretty important and timeless UX principle. I've felt that frustration myself many times.

@Nowooski 嗯，我确实认为“设计师一直试图强迫我们使用触摸屏，声称它们'时尚'，但实际上物理按钮要好得多”是一个非常重要且永恒的用户体验原则。我自己也曾多次感受到这种挫败感。

@ESYudkowsky I think lots of people 'know' that "their city runs on suffering", it's just that their picture of "runs on suffering" is "hires immigrants and pays them lower wages than we would like"

@ESYudkowsky 我认为很多人“知道”“他们的城市在苦难中奔跑”，只是他们“在苦难中奔跑”的形象是“雇用移民并支付给他们的工资比我们想要的低”

@nanexcool @evan_van_ness Still have the straw! https://t.co/sQKEUBfZt4

@nanexcool @evan_van_ness 还有救命稻草！ https://t.co/sQKEUBfZt4

@Noahpinion Individual miners can refuse to include whatever they want, but it has little effect; the transaction just gets into the next block.
Need a 51% attack (so, reverting blocks and not just excluding txs) to fully prevent txs from being included.

@Noahpinion 个别矿工可以拒绝包含他们想要的任何内容，但效果不大；交易刚刚进入下一个区块。
需要 51% 攻击（因此，恢复块，而不仅仅是排除 txs）以完全防止 txs 被包含在内。

你上次喝茶或者咖啡，你喝哪个？

你喝茶或者咖啡，哪个？

В последний раз когда ты пил чай или кофе, ты пил какой из них?

В последний раз когда ты пил чай или кофе, ты пил какой из них？

The last time you drank tea or coffee, which one did you drink?

你上一次喝茶或咖啡时，你喝的是哪一种？

@phildaian agreed, but with caveats (eg. the internet also has a tendency to forget that non-Americans exist, and while the reach of the US is large it's also not infinite)

@phildaian 同意，但有一些警告（例如，互联网也倾向于忘记非美国人的存在，虽然美国的影响力很大，但也不是无限的）

@phildaian Two fallacies of security:
1. 100% security is possible
2. 100% security is necessary
It's all a benefits and costs and probabilities game.

@phildaian 两个安全谬误：
1. 100% 安全是可能的
2. 需要 100% 的安全性
这都是一个收益、成本和概率游戏。

@TMKehrenberg @gwern @robertwiblin @tylercowen Oh I meant within a single Everett branch

@TMKehrenberg @gwern @robertwiblin @tylercowen 哦，我的意思是在单个 Everett 分支内

@gwern @robertwiblin @tylercowen I'd argue that from a moral perspective, N copies of the same agent implemented in N different places (whether virtually or physically) living exactly the same life only count as one agent.

@gwern @robertwiblin @tylercowen 我认为，从道德的角度来看，在 N 个不同的地方（无论是虚拟的还是物理的）实现相同代理的 N 个副本，过着完全相同的生活只算作一个代理。

@NathanpmYoung @aveek18 @bryan_caplan @bryan_caplan's previous book themes have the feeling of rising above or at least avoiding the partisan binary, this one feels more like extremely head-on taking a side on it. It's not "tugging sideways" https://www.overcomingbias.com...
I suspect this is where the discomfort comes from.

@NathanpmYoung @aveek18 @bryan_caplan @bryan_caplan 以前的书籍主题有一种超越或至少避免了党派二元的感觉，这本感觉更像是非常正面地站在一边。这不是“横着走”https://www.overcomingbias.com...< /一>
我怀疑这就是不适的来源。

@blockchainhippy @ChrisLundkvist @Velib Shareable bikes should just come with helmets imo.

@blockchainhippy @ChrisLundkvist @Velib 共享自行车应该只配备头盔。

@ChrisLundkvist I think the ebike discourse is intended for medium-big cities, not the US as a whole!
(And public transit in those places is very inadequate. Even in Paris, where transit is much better than the US, I found ebiking a more pleasant experience than the subway)

@ChrisLundkvist 我认为电动自行车的演讲是针对大中城市的，而不是针对整个美国的！
（而且那些地方的公共交通非常不完善。即使在交通比美国好得多的巴黎，我也发现电动自行车比地铁更愉快）

@ChrisLundkvist Yeah, I think the public discourse in general is still in the frame where pollution is the only problem, but actually congestion is at least as big a deal and is really harmful in all kinds of ways. And e-cars alone do nothing about it. 🙁

@ChrisLundkvist 是的，我认为公众舆论总体上仍处于污染是唯一问题的框架中，但实际上拥堵至少是一个大问题，并且在各种方面都非常有害。仅电动汽车对此无能为力。 🙁

@sharkiwhite @ChrisLundkvist Try using an uber/lime bike next time you are in a city that has them. They're actually quite convenient imo!
(Though exorbitantly priced; imo local govs should just run an at-cost alternative that works the same way [so pick up and drop off anywhere, not specialized stations])

@sharkiwhite @ChrisLundkvist 下次您在拥有它们的城市时尝试使用超级/石灰自行车。他们实际上很方便imo！
（尽管价格过高；海事组织当地政府应该只运行一种以相同方式工作的按成本替代方案[所以在任何地方接送，而不是专门的车站]）

@thefrozenfire @ChrisLundkvist Agree, this sucks and is unnecessary.

@thefrozenfire @ChrisLundkvist 同意，这很糟糕而且没有必要。