用户 Vitalik Non-giver of Ether(@ VitalikButerin) 的最新消息

@FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic eh I think you underrate how hard the collusion would be.
Whoever starts the collusion would basically have to reach out to dozens of people and ask "hey, are you also a keyholder? Wanna steal the money with me?", and if even one person reports them they're screwed.

@FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic 嗯,我认为你低估了勾结的难度。
谁发起勾结,基本上要联系几十个人,问“嘿,你也是钥匙持有人吗?要和我一起偷钱吗?”,一个人举报他们就完蛋了。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux @midmagic Humans are bad at weird complicated technical things. But our brains are literally evolved to be ASICs for answering social questions like "come up with a list of 7 people who won't all collude to betray me".

@pourteaux @midmagic 人类不擅长奇怪复杂的技术问题。但是我们的大脑实际上已经进化为 ASIC,用于回答诸如“列出 7 个不会串通背叛我的人的名单”之类的社会问题。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux @midmagic IMO fancy hardware stuff is all overrated and most people should just store the bulk of their coins in a multisig (>= 5 participants) where most of the keys are held by trusted family and friends.

@pourteaux @midmagic IMO 花哨的硬件东西都被高估了,大多数人应该把他们的大部分硬币存储在一个多重签名中(

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@LefterisJP @michaelblume Effective altruism

@LefterisJP @michaelblume 有效的利他主义

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@michaelblume I'd say the underlying issue is that extreme particularism (emphasizing deep traits that separate "us" vs "everyone else") is great at getting a community from 0.0001% to 5% of the population, but terrible at getting it from 5% to 50%.
Many crypto tribes have had similar issues.

@michaelblume 我想说的根本问题是极端特殊主义(强调将“我们”与“其他人”区分开来的深层特征)非常适合将一个社区从 0.0001% 增加到 5% 的人口,但很难从5% 到 50%。
许多加密部落都有类似的问题。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@tjrwriting @C_Harwick @ZachWeiner @larsiusprime Isn't there a bunch of evidence that we're better off starting school 1-2 hours later anyway?

@tjrwriting @C_Harwick @ZachWeiner @larsiusprime 不是有一堆证据表明我们最好晚 1-2 小时开始上学吗?

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ZachWeiner @larsiusprime Also, the US needs a mainstream "switch to metric" movement.
(Feel free to leave out F vs C, I know that one is controversial, but meters, liters and kg all the way)

@ZachWeiner @larsiusprime 此外,美国需要主流的“转向公制”运动。
(请随意省略 F 与 C,我知道有一个是有争议的,但米,升和公斤一直是)

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ZachWeiner @larsiusprime Abolish daylight savings time.
(Making DST permanent is fine too, I don't care, I just want us to stop changing the time twice a year)

@ZachWeiner @larsiusprime 取消夏令时。
(将夏令时设为永久也可以,我不在乎,我只是希望我们停止一年两次更改时间)

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@balajis In my experience this effect is deep; you can sometimes route around people's entire systems of preconceived political biases just by switching languages.

@balajis 根据我的经验,这种影响很深;有时,您可以通过切换语言绕过人们的整个先入为主的政治偏见系统。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@balajis Eg. the subconscious feelings you immediately get about a person, your expectations of what political opinions they might have, if you hear them saying "智商" in Chinese are very much not the same as what you would get if you hear them say "IQ" in English.

@balajis 例如。你对一个人的下意识感觉,你对他们可能有什么政治观点的期望,如果你听到他们用中文说“智商”,你会得到什么英语。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@balajis Words definitely have complicated webs of connotations and cultural associations that get completely stripped out even in high-quality translations.

@balajis Words 肯定有复杂的内涵和文化关联网络,即使在高质量的翻译中也会被完全剥离。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@elidourado I've done Syracuse to Ithaca (100km) a couple of times before, it worked fine.

@elidourado 我之前做过几次锡拉丘兹到伊萨卡(100 公里),效果很好。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Personally I think you should start with the communication layer first, and add the formal governance layer later.
If you're doing it correctly, step 1 is just defining the values and building the community, you'll only have something you actually need to govern a bit later. https://twitter.com/jbrukh/sta...

Best tools to implement a Network State today?

发表时间:3年前 作者:Jake Brukhman #RabbitHoleTalks @jbrukh

个人觉得应该先从通信层入手,以后再加入正式的治理层。
如果你做得正确,第 1 步只是定义价值观和建立社区,你只会有一些你真正需要稍后管理的东西。 https://twitter.com/jbrukh/sta...

当今实现网络状态的最佳工具?

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

https://vitalik.ca/ has dark mode now!
Big thanks to @dcodev_ for implementing this, and to the @gitcoin bounties platform for organizing.

https://vitalik.ca/ 现在有黑暗模式了!
非常感谢@dcodev_ 的实现,以及@gitcoin bounties 平台的组织。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

The terminal total difficulty has been set to 58750000000000000000000.
This means the ethereum PoW network now has a (roughly) fixed number of hashes left to mine.
https://bordel.wtf/ predicts the merge will happen around Sep 15, though the exact date depends on hashrate. https://t.co/9YnloTWSi1

终端总难度已设置为 58750000000000000000000。
这意味着以太坊 PoW 网络现在有(大致)固定数量的哈希值可供挖掘。
https://bordel.wtf/ 预测合并将在 9 月 15 日左右发生,但具体日期取决于算力。 https://t.co/9YnloTWSi1

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@pourteaux On the other hand:
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit...

Paradox of authority: you can't be consistent and believe authority too much, because different authorities frequently have low opinions of each other. So either you end up half-skeptical toward all, or you (intentionally or not) make your own choice of which authority to follow.

发表时间:4年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@pourteaux 另一方面:
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit...

权威悖论:你不能一以贯之,也不能太相信权威,因为不同的权威往往对彼此的评价很低。所以要么你最终对所有人半信半疑,要么你(有意或无意地)自己选择遵循哪个权威。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@miroyato @bantg 19% usdc, 19% some euro thing, 19% something out of Singapore?

@miroyato @bantg 19% 美元,19% 欧元的东西,19% 的东西来自新加坡?

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@miroyato @bantg Personally I think no single type of non-ETH collateral should be allowed to exceed 20% of the total. Maybe even limit to max 20% in any single jurisdiction.
And if you can't do that, put a limit on DAI's growth (eg. by adding a negative interest rate) until you can.

@miroyato @bantg 就我个人而言,我认为任何一种非 ETH 抵押品都不能超过总量的 20%。在任何一个司法管辖区,甚至可能限制为最高 20%。
如果你做不到,就限制 DAI 的增长(例如,通过增加负利率),直到你能做到为止。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@bantg Errr this seems like a risky and terrible idea. If ETH drops a lot, value of collateral would go way down but CDPs would not get liquidated, so the whole system would risk becoming a fractional reserve.

@bantg Errr 这似乎是一个冒险而可怕的想法。如果 ETH 大幅下跌,抵押品的价值将大幅下降,但 CDP 不会被清算,因此整个系统将面临成为部分准备金的风险。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情