@udiWertheimer And PoW penalizes anyone who has a smaller percentage of hashpower than their percentage of the coin supply ☺️
(Actually, it penalizes much more than that because profit < revenue, but you get the point)
@udiWertheimer 和 PoW 会惩罚任何拥有比其代币供应百分比更小的算力百分比的人☺️
（实际上，它的惩罚远不止于此，因为利润
@robinhanson @Big_Worker The easiest and least intrusive way to implement such a tax is to tax the thing that vehicles already consume roughly in proportion to their weight. But alas, this has not been especially popular when proposed.
@robinhanson @Big_Worker 实施此类税收的最简单且侵入性最小的方法是对车辆已经消耗的东西与它们的重量大致成比例地征税。但是很可惜，这在提出时并不是特别受欢迎。
@Noahpinion "Pretend downtown SF doesn't exist and you'll love the bay area" is a pretty common take I've heard from people in the area.
Which is... a very screwed up and quite unusual dynamic.
@Noahpinion “假装旧金山市中心不存在，你会爱上海湾地区”是我从该地区的人们那里听到的一个很常见的看法。
这是......一个非常糟糕且非常不寻常的动态。
@Noahpinion This thread made me realize in part why SF discourse confuses me. I feel like "San Francisco" (in the official defn of the term) is not even a useful object to talk about. "Downtown SF" is. "The bay area" is. But eg. west side SF is more like the south bay than like downtown.
@Noahpinion 这个帖子让我部分意识到为什么 SF 话语让我感到困惑。我觉得“旧金山”（在该术语的官方定义中）甚至不是一个有用的对象。 “旧金山市中心”是。 “湾区”是。但是例如。旧金山西侧更像是南湾而不是市中心。
@tayvano_ @_SamWilsn_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs Right but with 5003 you still need some way to initiate operations that go into the resulting smart contract wallet (without centralization or massive gas overhead), which is exactly what 4337 provides. So I see it as a complement, not substitute, for 4337.
@tayvano_ @_SamWilsn_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs 是的，但是对于 5003，你仍然需要一些方法来启动进入生成的智能合约钱包的操作（没有集中化或大量的 gas 开销），这正是 4337 提供的。所以我认为它是 4337 的补充，而不是替代。
@tayvano_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs How does 3074 solve that? It still leaves a single unchangeable private key in control of your account.
@tayvano_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs 3074 如何解决这个问题？它仍然留下一个不可更改的私钥来控制您的帐户。
@OptiChads They do! Though it doesn't usually get all the way to a subconscious "fun is all we need to accomplish" frame.
@OptiChads 他们做到了！虽然它通常不会一直深入到潜意识的“乐趣就是我们需要完成的一切”框架。
Grubby power trippers of course exist and continue to be a big problem. In business and in politics.
肮脏的电源跳闸当然存在并且仍然是一个大问题。在商业和政治中。
"Rich people are grubby power trippers" is an overrated frame. "Rich people wanna have fun" is an often more accurate frame that explains well why there are rich/poor misalignments even among good people.
“有钱人是肮脏的权力绊脚石”是一个被高估的框架。 “有钱人想玩得开心”通常是一个更准确的框架，它很好地解释了为什么即使在好人之间也会存在贫富不一致。
@404T2K There's nothing *wrong* with being a rich person seeking fun and self-expression. It only breaks down when you start designing entire visions for the future of society around the idea that everyone is like that.
@404T2K 作为一个寻求乐趣和自我表达的有钱人没有任何*错*。只有当你开始围绕每个人都是这样的想法设计社会未来的整个愿景时，它才会崩溃。
This is an important disconnect that people building in the crypto space do need to be aware of. Crypto-wealthy people often join DAOs for tribal affiliation and fun and self-expression, but our long-term target audience wants DAOs designed around very pragmatic needs. https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
Modern rich-country elite politics is not about economics, it's about vibes, exhibit #247.
(Poor countries and even non-elites in rich countries definitely operate this way much less. They can't afford to) https://twitter.com/TuurDemees...
这是一个重要的脱节，人们在加密空间中构建确实需要注意。加密货币富有的人经常加入 DAO 是为了部落归属感、乐趣和自我表达，但我们的长期目标受众希望 DAO 是围绕非常务实的需求而设计的。 https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
现代富国精英政治不是关于经济，而是关于氛围，展览
Modern rich-country elite politics is not about economics, it's about vibes, exhibit #247.
(Poor countries and even non-elites in rich countries definitely operate this way much less. They can't afford to) https://twitter.com/TuurDemees...
A silver lining of all this elysian BS, to me, is that this makes it more obvious that there's a synergy possible between "boring" bitcoin and "boring" traditional architecture. (Screenshot is from Consensys' website) https://t.co/P1fWlUCFZs
发表时间：3年前 作者：Tuur Demeester @TuurDemeester现代富国精英政治不是关于经济，而是关于氛围，展览
对我来说，所有这些极乐世界的 BS 的一线希望是，这使得“无聊”比特币和“无聊”传统架构之间可能存在协同作用变得更加明显。 （截图来自 Consensys 的网站）https://t.co/P1fWlUCFZs
@tayvano_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs 3074 + 5003 doesn't solve the same problem though..
@tayvano_ @AlexMasmej @gremplin @axeldelafosse @adietrichs 3074 5003 并没有解决同样的问题。
@_bfarmer That ship sailed when we added BLS aggregation, unfortunately.
I asked many times if we can try to replace BLS with some Halo aggregation thing. Answer was that it's much too slow; BLS is just far too convenient.
@_bfarmer 不幸的是，当我们添加 BLS 聚合时，那艘船就启航了。
我问了很多次我们是否可以尝试用一些 Halo 聚合的东西来代替 BLS。答案是它太慢了。 BLS 实在是太方便了。
RT: My favorite speech at SBC was no surprise - @VitalikButerin’s Decentralizing the Builder Role
I break down and analyze distributed builders
Huge thanks to @VitalikButerin @sreeramkannan @bertcmiller and @thegostep for your review and input!
https://joncharbonneau.substac...
RT：我在 SBC 最喜欢的演讲并不意外——@VitalikButerin 的分散建设者角色
我分解和分析分布式构建器
非常感谢 @VitalikButerin @sreeramkannan @bertcmiller 和 @thegostep 的评论和意见！
https://joncharbonneau.substac...
@llllvvuu @glenweyl @gitcoin @owocki Possible bear case: hyperparameter optimization is inherently more specialized and technocratic and benefits less from per-project local knowledge than grantmaking.
Could work well with good delegation infrastructure though!
@llllvvuu @glenweyl @gitcoin @owocki 可能的熊案例：超参数优化本质上更专业和技术官僚，并且从每个项目的本地知识中受益比赠款少。
可以很好地与良好的委派基础设施一起工作！
RT: Ethereum creator @VitalikButerin joined the Kyiv Tech Summit to provide his support to hackers on the ground floor building the humanitarian tools of tomorrow.
He also spoke on a panel with @abornyakov about the future of Web3 in Ukraine. https://t.co/1Yt1r2zQeN
RT：以太坊的创造者@VitalikButerin 加入了基辅技术峰会，为底层的黑客提供支持，构建未来的人道主义工具。
他还在与@abornyakov 的小组讨论中谈到了乌克兰 Web3 的未来。 https://t.co/1Yt1r2zQeN
Big thanks to @KyivTechSummit and everyone involved for the opportunity to visit!
An amazing and brave community in Ukraine that we all have a lot to learn from. https://twitter.com/KyivTechSu... https://t.co/PzqXPoYl8o
📢 @VitalikButerin makes his first ever visit to Ukraine during Kyiv Tech Summit
⛏️ KTS brought together 500+ hackers with around 50 project submissions to help Ukraine
🎤 KTS also featured over 30+ expert speakers, even @abornyakov @FedorovMykhailo
https://www.coindesk.com/busin...
非常感谢@KyivTechSummit 和所有参与的人有机会参观！
乌克兰是一个了不起的勇敢社区，我们都有很多东西可以学习。 https://twitter.com/KyivTechSu... https://t.co/PzqXPoYl8o
📢 @VitalikButerin 在基辅科技峰会期间首次访问乌克兰
⛏️ KTS 汇集了 500 名黑客和大约 50 个项目提交来帮助乌克兰
🎤 KTS 还邀请了超过 30 位专家演讲者，甚至是 @abornyakov @FedorovMykhailo
https://www.coindesk.com/busin...
@YoungMilkmanNft To clarify, the point of the proposal is that the annual fee would be based on 0.5% of the highest bid (could be any percentage, but 0.5% was what I proposed).
So someone would have to bid $128k to raise a domain's annual fee to $640.
@YoungMilkmanNft 澄清一下，该提案的重点是年费将基于最高出价的 0.5%（可以是任何百分比，但我提议的是 0.5%）。
因此，有人必须出价 12.8 万美元才能将域名的年费提高到 640 美元。
@YoungMilkmanNft Why would a normie get someone offering to buy their domain for $128k?
@YoungMilkmanNft 为什么普通人会让人愿意以 12.8 万美元的价格购买他们的域名？