@hudsonjameson > original leadership turnover that leaves open room for inadequate or self-interested individuals to fill the gaps
"the succession problem" ☺️

@hudsonjameson

@pourteaux I just instinctively call it mainland (same with non-UK Europe for that matter) because I've spent too much time in Asia.

@pourteaux 我只是本能地将其称为大陆（与非英国欧洲相同），因为我在亚洲度过了太多时间。

The main exception is of course that if you find someone who has this vibe, and they accidentally demonstrate a big and relevant error in domain knowledge themselves, then it's okay to flip over your own domain expertise cards as part of exposing their hypocrisy.

当然，主要的例外是，如果您发现有人具有这种​​氛围，并且他们自己不小心在领域知识方面表现出重大且相关的错误，那么可以翻转您自己的领域专业知识卡作为揭露他们虚伪的一部分。

@jaypinho lolwat
"The Laffer curve exists" and "we are currently on the right side of the Laffer curve" are two very very different statements.

@jaypinho lolwat
“存在拉弗曲线”和“我们目前处于拉弗曲线的右侧”是两种截然不同的说法。

People whose primary vibe is "I and my tribe are domain-expertise-endowed professionals, the people I criticize and mock are amateurs, and you should shut up" are really really uncool, and people should recognize the pattern and immediately unfollow anyone who exhibits it.

以“我和我的部落是领域专长的专业人士，我批评和嘲笑的人是业余爱好者，你应该闭嘴”为主要氛围的人真的很不酷，人们应该认识到这种模式并立即取消关注任何表现出来的人它。

DAOs are not corporations: where decentralization in autonomous organizations matters
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

DAO 不是公司：自治组织的去中心化很重要
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

RT: “it’s a politically meaningful act to have a personal website”

RT：“拥有个人网站是一种具有政治意义的行为”

@MuKappa @KyivPost @cryptodrftng Yeah this was from @cryptodrftng

@MuKappa @KyivPost @cryptodrftng 是的，这是来自@cryptodrftng

@danfinlay That got rejected because of complexity concerns. Tx-wide context variables existed already so it was easy to add one more, block-wide context variables do not.

@danfinlay 由于复杂性问题而被拒绝。 Tx 范围的上下文变量已经存在，因此很容易再添加一个，块范围的上下文变量没有。

@JamiedaConquest Gm1m2/r^2

@JamiedaConquest Gm1m2/r^2

I try to explain the additive vs multiplicative notation issue for elliptic curves, and get a little bit into the question of what to do with the GT group. https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

我尝试解释椭圆曲线的加法与乘法符号问题，并稍微探讨一下如何处理 GT 组的问题。 https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

It's also the anniversary of the 2016 Shanghai DoS attacks. https://twitter.com/depthsofwi...

这也是 2016 年上海 DoS 攻击的周年纪念日。 https://twitter.com/depthsofwi...

@davidonchain H is already pronounced "aych"; if you want to go lobby to rename it "huh" (and W to "we" or "wuh") I'll support you, but I'm trying to start with the low hanging fruit here first.

@davidonchain H 已经发音为“aych”；如果你想去大厅把它重命名为“huh”（并将 W 改成“we”或“wuh”），我会支持你，但我想先从这里容易实现的目标开始。

@Galois_Capital @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson That doesn't work because ⚬ is commutative and exponentiation is not.
I recommend you go take first year linear algebra or some coursera equivalent before you argue big boy topics with us any more.

@Galois_Capital @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 这不起作用，因为 ⚬ 是可交换的，而取幂不是。
我建议您在与我们再争论大男孩话题之前，先去学习第一年的线性代数或类似的课程。

@0xninicha @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson Multiplication is a function.

@0xninicha @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 乘法是一个函数。

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson But even if you're not willing to use "+" for GT multiplication, you can still use additive notation for elliptic curve crypto (and I do). But then, you want to use e(A, B) instead of A * B for pairings to avoid confusing people.

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 但是即使你不愿意使用“”来进行 GT 乘法，你仍然可以对椭圆曲线加密使用加法表示法（我也这样做）。但是，您想使用 e(A, B) 而不是 A * B 进行配对以避免混淆。

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson And so this is the debate. Do we make the black-box view cleaner, or do we make it more accurately describe what's going on "under the hood"?

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 这就是辩论。我们是让黑盒视图更清晰，还是让它更准确地描述“幕后”发生的事情？

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson This makes a lot of pedantically inclined people's brains explode. Noooo, you can't just pretend that it's addition, it literally is multiplication! And yet if you pretend it's addition, it just makes describing cryptographic protocols soooo much easier.

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 这让很多学究式的人的大脑爆炸了。不，你不能假装它是加法，它实际上是乘法！然而，如果你假装它是加法，它只会让描述加密协议变得非常容易。

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson But, and here's the fun part, from a mathematical perspective, the ⚬ operation between GT elements *literally is multiplication*. And so if we want the math to look clean when treating A, B and X as a black box, we have to pretend that multiplication in GT is addition.

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 但是，从数学的角度来看，这是有趣的部分，GT 元素之间的 ⚬ 运算*字面意思是乘法*。因此，如果我们希望在将 A、B 和 X 视为黑盒时数学看起来干净，我们必须假设 GT 中的乘法是加法。

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson And the fun question. What do we call the ⚬ operation above? From a "black box" perspective, it seems correct to just call it addition. After all, if you plug in numbers instead of curve points to the equation, and `A * B = X`, then `(3A) * B = A * (3B) = X + X + X` is correct.

@TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 还有一个有趣的问题。我们把上面的⚬操作叫做什么？从“黑匣子”的角度来看，将其称为加法似乎是正确的。毕竟，如果你在方程中插入数字而不是曲线点，并且“A * B = X”，那么“(3A) * B = A * (3B) = X X X”是正确的。