@Kdenkss I'm not sure I'm convinced by this! The outside view makes sense, but the inside view has many headwinds pushing against geographic centralization. High living costs, remote work arbitrage, regulatory, migration-unfriendly politics, better and better online collaboration...

@Kdenkss 我不确定我是否对此深信不疑！外部观点是有道理的，但内部观点有许多阻碍地理集中的阻力。高昂的生活成本、远程工作套利、监管、不利于移民的政治、越来越好的在线协作……

@designheretic I would say there is space for that, though it should be directed less to the current RU regime than to the people and to alternative elites.

@designheretic 我会说这是有空间的，尽管它不应该针对当前的俄罗斯政权，而是针对人民和替代精英。

@Tree_Binance There is less opposition to the war than I wish there would be, but there is also very little genuine enthusiasm.
This site gives a good overview: https://www.chronicles.report/...

@Tree_Binance 对战争的反对比我希望的要少，但真正的热情也很少。
这个网站提供了一个很好的概述：https://www.chronicles.report/...

@designheretic If you opposed toppling Gaddafi because that action contributed a bunch of countries' leaders feeling an incentive to get nukes, you should support toppling Putin for the same reason.

@designheretic 如果您反对推翻卡扎菲，因为这一行动让许多国家的领导人感到有动力获得核武器，那么您应该出于同样的原因支持推翻普京。

@designheretic Surrendering to a dictator once he starts waving nukes around is itself escalatory. It sends a clear signal to every other dictator of how they can make conquests with impunity.

@designheretic 一旦他开始挥舞核武器，就向独裁者投降本身就是升级。它向所有其他独裁者发出了一个明确的信号，表明他们如何能够不受惩罚地进行征服。

I've seen civilian death estimates for Mariupol everywhere in the 20k-120k range. At the higher end, that would be over a quarter of the entire city. And this is for a city with as large a population as Miami.

我已经在 20k-120k 范围内看到了 Mariupol 的平民死亡估计数。在较高端，这将超过整个城市的四分之一。这适用于像迈阿密这样人口众多的城市。

Stuff like this is why Ukraine can't just "give up a fifth of their territory if that's what it takes to ensure peace".
This isn't a game of Risk, there's millions of people stuck in occupied territory, and it's not the sort of occupation any of you would be okay with living in. https://twitter.com/cryptodrft...

像这样的事情就是为什么乌克兰不能“放弃五分之一的领土，如果这是确保和平所需要的”。
这不是一场风险游戏，有数百万人被困在被占领的领土上，这不是你们任何人都可以接受的职业。https://twitter.com/cryptodrft...

@ne0liberal Is there a name for the political system that pretends to believe in decentralization/localism but actually achieves centrally decided outcomes by selectively choosing which locality (individual, employer, city, state, tech platform...) gets to dominate in each case?

@ne0liberal 是否有一个政治体系的名称，它假装相信权力下放/地方主义，但实际上通过有选择地选择哪个地方（个人、雇主、城市、州、技术平台......）在每种情况下占主导地位，从而实现中央决定的结果?

@BenWest Normally I go to sleep around 22:00 wherever I am!

@BenWest 通常，无论我在哪里，我都会在 22:00 左右睡觉！

@jessi_cata @RokoMijic The DAS assumptions are only required in the "majority or near-majority dishonest" case. If <1/3 dishonest, random sampling by validators would cause a bad block to get rejected.

@jessi_cata @RokoMijic 只有在“多数或接近多数不诚实”的情况下才需要 DAS 假设。如果

@RokoMijic @jessi_cata KZG commitments seem strictly better than Merkle trees. KZG leaves no possibility of incorrect encoding, so you don't have to worry about all the complexity around recovery from incorrect encoding at all.

@RokoMijic @jessi_cata KZG 承诺似乎比默克尔树更好。 KZG 不存在错误编码的可能性，因此您完全不必担心从错误编码中恢复的所有复杂性。

@BenWest https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

@BenWest https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

@yorkerhodes @twobitidiot @MSFTResearch What do the worst-case stats on this look like?
Actually increasing the gas limit would require not just increasing average-case performance, but making sure worst-case DoS blocks don't end up taking too long to process.

@yorkerhodes @twobitidiot @MSFTResearch 这方面的最坏情况统计数据是什么样的？
实际上，增加 gas 限制不仅需要提高平均情况下的性能，还需要确保最坏情况下的 DoS 块最终不会花费太长时间来处理。

@billythalheimer How many passengers per plane on one of these? And does it require a pilot for fixed routes or could that be automated?

@billythalheimer 其中一架飞机每架飞机有多少乘客？它是否需要固定路线的飞行员，还是可以自动化？

16 hours left to contribute to the gitcoin grants round!
https://gitcoin.co/grants/

还剩 16 小时可以为 gitcoin 赠款做出贡献！
https://gitcoin.co/grants/

A logo for the Casper consensus algorithm, Stable Diffusion via https://beta.dreamstudio.ai/
(this one took a brush and a few prompts, it's not quite good with text yet, but getting there!) https://t.co/dFWUHIHE2b

Casper 共识算法的标志，通过 https://beta.dreamstudio.ai/ 实现的稳定扩散
（这个拿了刷子和一些提示，它的文字还不是很好，但到达那里！）https://t.co/dFWUHIHE2b

@vgr @geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert Low rate of change in circumstances is key. People do naturally select for alignment to some extent, but this gets completely broken if the issues change and everyone's thinking completely reshuffles every few years.

@vgr @geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert 环境变化率低是关键。人们在某种程度上自然会选择对齐，但如果问题发生变化并且每个人的思维每隔几年就会完全重新洗牌，这就会完全被打破。

@vgr @geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert Yeah that's fair, but I think even given stronger correlations between opinions, max agreement decreases as dimensionality increases seems both true and close to the argument you were actually making.

@vgr @geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert 是的，这很公平，但我认为即使意见之间的相关性更强，随着维度的增加，最大一致性也会降低，这看起来既真实又接近你实际提出的论点。

@geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert As the number of issues you care about approaches infinity, average max-agreement should asymptotically approach 50%.
I think this is the mathematical intuition behind what @vgr calls divergentism.

@geoffreyirving @StefanFSchubert 随着您关心的问题数量接近无穷大，平均最大一致性应渐近接近 50%。
我认为这就是@vgr 所说的发散主义背后的数学直觉。

@Noahpinion This looks like someone rediscovered some automated political ideology generator from 2003 and fed it with new source data.

@Noahpinion 这看起来像是有人从 2003 年重新发现了一些自动化的政治意识形态生成器，并为其提供了新的源数据。