@Aella_Girl In particular, if you find that a "work" task energizes you, keep doing it. And if a "life" task drains you and doesn't contribute importantly to future happiness, dump it.
@Aella_Girl 特别是，如果您发现“工作”任务使您充满活力，请继续执行。如果一项“生活”任务使您筋疲力尽，并且对未来的幸福没有重要贡献，那就扔掉它。
@Aella_Girl "Work life balance" is a bad frame because there is nothing in human psychology that makes a task draining just because it is productive. Humans do have many needs for balance but it's more subtle than that. Each person is different.
@Aella_Girl“工作与生活的平衡”是一个糟糕的框架，因为人类心理学中没有任何事情会仅仅因为它富有成效而使任务耗尽。人类确实有很多平衡的需求，但它比这更微妙。每个人都是不同的。
@glenweyl I agree with the thread! Once we have really robust working QV well tested it's definitely worth incorporating it into the pricing function or gating the harberger mechanism somehow.
@glenweyl 我同意这个帖子！一旦我们对真正强大的工作 QV 进行了良好的测试，绝对值得将其纳入定价功能或以某种方式控制 harberger 机制。
RT: Today, we announced that @Coinbase is funding and supporting a lawsuit by six individuals against the Treasury Department’s sanctions of Tornado Cash’s smart contracts, an open source piece of software. You can read more about the details here: https://blog.coinbase.com/defe...
RT：今天，我们宣布@Coinbase 正在资助和支持六名个人针对财政部对 Tornado Cash 智能合约（一种开源软件）的制裁的诉讼。您可以在此处阅读有关详细信息的更多信息：https://blog.coinbase.com/拒绝...
@ArthurB Ah, when I think about land taxes, my usual model is that the imputed land value would be the same across an entire region (eg. a few city blocks).
@ArthurB啊，当我考虑土地税时，我通常的模型是估算的土地价值在整个地区（例如几个城市街区）都是相同的。
@cz_binance This is an underrated side benefit of efficiency-preserving and efficiency-increasing taxes. They tend to be lighter on all kinds of secondary costs.
@cz_binance 这是效率保持和提高效率税收的一个被低估的附带好处。它们在各种次级成本上往往较轻。
@cz_binance Important to compare with realistic alternatives imo. Income and sales taxes are complex, they significantly discourage productive effort, they require heavy financial surveillance and bureaucratic legal+accounting costs, etc.
@cz_binance 与 imo 的现实替代品进行比较很重要。所得税和销售税很复杂，它们极大地阻碍了生产努力，它们需要严格的财务监督和官僚的法律会计成本等。
@ArthurB I'd also argue that the investment-discouraging effect of property taxes is reduced somewhat in a context where construction is bottlenecked by bad zoning laws anyway.
(Incentive not to upgrade quality still exists, incentive not to upsize doesn't)
@ArthurB我还认为，在建筑受到不良分区法的瓶颈的情况下，房产税的投资抑制作用会有所降低。
（不升级质量的激励仍然存在，不升级的激励不存在）
@ArthurB Property taxes discourage improvements, land taxes should not (or at least discourage it only minimally, to the extent that stuff you do on your own land increases land values in the entire region)
@ArthurB 房产税不鼓励改善，土地税不应该（或者至少在最低限度上阻止它，因为你在自己的土地上做的事情会增加整个地区的土地价值）
@schmrypto @larsiusprime most recently, but realistically many people before that
@schmrypto @larsiusprime 最近，但实际上很多人在那之前
@nicksdjohnson Because "credibly neutral marketplaces" inherently have high positive externalities and are difficult to monetize, so forcing them to monetize (at least monetize better than the next highest bidder) reduces the chance you get something actually credibly neutral.
@nicksdjohnson 因为“可信中立的市场”本质上具有很高的正外部性并且难以货币化，所以强迫它们货币化（至少比下一个最高出价者更好地货币化）会降低你获得真正中立的东西的机会。
@nicksdjohnson You responded too quickly 😛
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@nicksdjohnson One of the conditions being that >50% of the revenue of the marketplace should go back to the ENS DAO.
In the long term, this approach may well generate much more lasting and scalable revenue for the ENS DAO than one-time sales!
@nicksdjohnson 你反应太快了😛
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@nicksdjohnson 条件之一是
@nicksdjohnson One of the conditions being that >50% of the revenue of the marketplace should go back to the ENS DAO.
In the long term, this approach may well generate much more lasting and scalable revenue for the ENS DAO than one-time sales!
@nicksdjohnson 条件之一是
@nicksdjohnson I still prefer the approach where the ENS DAO takes a heavier hand and intentionally hands out 1-2 letter subdomains to projects that are good-faith attempts to create credibly neutral marketplaces.
@nicksdjohnson 我仍然更喜欢 ENS DAO 采取更重手并有意将 1-2 个字母的子域分发给善意尝试创建可信中立市场的项目的方法。
One thing that people don't appreciate enough about land taxes (and even property taxes) is that the existence of the tax means the property is much cheaper for you to acquire in the first place. You can put the difference into stocks and pay the tax out of the price gains.
人们对土地税（甚至财产税）不够重视的一件事是，税收的存在意味着您首先获得的财产要便宜得多。您可以将差价存入股票并从价格收益中缴纳税款。
@LilNonfungible @nicksdjohnson Oh I'd be happy to pay a $640/year renewal fee on it.
@LilNonfungible @nicksdjohnson 哦，我很乐意为此支付 640 美元/年的续订费。
@nicksdjohnson Isn't the Harberger registrar idea exactly backwards in some sense though? The whole point is to experiment with Harbergering (or, in my other example, adding a trademark court to) subdomains, not to do that with the top-level domain and keep subdomains immutable.
@nicksdjohnson Harberger 注册商的想法在某种意义上不是完全倒退了吗？重点是尝试使用 Harbergering（或者，在我的另一个示例中，向子域添加商标法院），而不是对顶级域执行此操作并保持子域不可变。
RT: Vitalik Buterin is worse than a communist https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...
RT：Vitalik Buterin 比共产主义者更糟糕 https://twitter.com/vitalikbut...
@ChristoSavaides @AlecStapp And perhaps more importantly, drastic social status restructuring.
@ChristoSavaides @AlecStapp 也许更重要的是，剧烈的社会地位重组。
RT: @Noahpinion Using climate as an "opportunity" to go after people with the wrong vibez is harmful to the cause of mitigating climate change.
RT：@Noahpinion 将气候作为“机会”来追捕有错误情绪的人，这对缓解气候变化的事业是有害的。