@WooHooQi @chantz_y @bethanyshondark Average is about 500. There are spikes some days much higher (last big one was August 31 with 1400)

@WooHooQi @chantz_y @bethanyshondark 平均约为 500。有些天的峰值要高得多（最后一个大峰值是 8 月 31 日，为 1400）

@Noahpinion Why does everything lead back to Russia?
Serious question.
Particularly for the US, it's a very distant country with relatively little economic or social integration. The amount of involvement with a certain subset of western elites is odd.

@Noahpinion 为什么一切都回到俄罗斯？
严肃的问题。
特别是对美国来说，它是一个非常遥远的国家，经济或社会一体化程度相对较低。与西方精英的某个子集的参与程度很奇怪。

@paix120 @VirginiaBuysse Bots

@paix120 @VirginiaBuysse 机器人

@joeyfox85 @OhCasavant @johnFarUV @SafeSchoolsBC @tdsb @jheighton3 Thank you

@joeyfox85 @OhCasavant @johnFarUV @SafeSchoolsBC @tdsb @jheighton3 谢谢

@aetiology (Data from 2018, probably worse now.)
https://www.kff.org/other/slid...

@aetiology（2018 年的数据，现在可能更糟。）
https://www.kff.org/other/slid...

@joeyfox85 @OhCasavant @johnFarUV @SafeSchoolsBC @tdsb @jheighton3 Why would it not apply in a classroom?
Are you quibbling with the specific number/study or is there a reason why it would be substantially less effective in a classroom?

@joeyfox85 @OhCasavant @johnFarUV @SafeSchoolsBC @tdsb @jheighton3 为什么它不适用于教室？
您是否对具体的数字/学习有疑问，或者是否有理由说明它在课堂上的效果会大大降低？

@elizavetaka @aprilhenrybooks @karenkho If it were money laundering the books would "sell" more copies. In fact they're just duds.

@elizavetaka @aprilhenrybooks @karenkho 如果是洗钱，这些书会“出售”更多的副本。事实上，他们只是哑弹。

@i_petersen @EricTopol Adjusted for age and other factors stated in the footnote

@i_petersen @EricTopol 已根据脚注中所述的年龄和其他因素进行了调整

@balajis https://www.vice.com/en/articl...

@balajis https://www.vice.com/en/article...

@nailatrahman @PlainolBlackman https://www.foxbusiness.com/li...

@nailatrahman @PlainolBlackman https://www .foxbusiness.com/li...

@annwestover25 @maziehirono Inflation is NOT "still going up". CPI was reported at 9.1% in June and 8.5% in July.
This of course has nothing to do with the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, which hadn't passed yet.

@annwestover25 @maziehirono 通货膨胀不是“还在上升”。 CPI 报告 6 月份为 9.1%，7 月份为 8.5%。
这当然与尚未通过的所谓的《减通胀法案》无关。

@maziehirono Amazon paid $1.7 billion in income taxes in 2020 and $3.7 billion in 2021.
These rates are low, but they're NOT $0.
Fact check: FALSE
Source: https://ir.aboutamazon.com/new... https://t.co/pJ1LW20ne1

@maziehirono 亚马逊在 2020 年缴纳了 17 亿美元的所得税，在 2021 年缴纳了 37 亿美元。
这些费率很低，但不是 0 美元。
事实核查：错误
来源：https://ir.aboutamazon.com/new... https://t.co/pJ1LW20ne1

@jdumes98 @_Eric_Reinhart It is within his power (up to the point of available funding/inventory, so it may be running out now). This was done months ago.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@jdumes98 @_Eric_Reinhart 这在他的权力范围内（直到可用的资金/库存，所以现在可能已经用完了）。这是几个月前完成的。
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru.. .

@efb_1 @Truth_in_Number Both. Also continued drift of variants making previous immunity less effective. March of time, especially with low continued boosting rates -> more death.

@efb_1 @Truth_in_Number 两者。变体的持续漂移也使先前的免疫效果降低。时间的三月，尤其是在低持续提升率的情况下——

@johnkriby1 @Schmidt18Pam @amandalhu Better boosted vax rates too. But in any case you can't directly compare case rates with different testing and reporting practices.

@johnkriby1 @Schmidt18Pam @amandalhu 也更好地提高了 vax 率。但无论如何，您都无法直接将病例率与不同的测试和报告做法进行比较。

@johnkriby1 @Schmidt18Pam @amandalhu Case rates high and death rates low is probably just better testing, or masks plus lower risk people are more careless (going to bars, etc. without masks).

@johnkriby1 @Schmidt18Pam @amandalhu 高病例率和低死亡率可能只是更好的测试，或者口罩加上风险较低的人更粗心（不戴口罩去酒吧等）。

@Truth_in_Number @efb_1 That looks different than the chart from NY Times. I'm not sure why. You're one may be "by date of death" which has the fake decline toward the end since data hasn't filled in yet, but that is just a guess. https://t.co/vyYDYVLn6D

@Truth_in_Number @efb_1 这看起来与纽约时报的图表不同。我不确定为什么。您可能是“按死亡日期”，由于尚未填写数据，因此最终会出现虚假下降，但这只是猜测。 https://t.co/vyYDYVLn6D

@Truth_in_Number @efb_1 It's SLOWLY trending up. I think due to waning, but I could be wrong as to the reason. 7 day average July 1: 380 (in May was ~300), most recent: 530.

@Truth_in_Number @efb_1 它正在缓慢上升。我认为是由于减弱，但我可能是错误的原因。 7 月 1 日平均 7 天：380（5 月约为 300），最近：530。

@Fandango1Jimmy @rockshotphotos @latimes Much smaller number, and sometimes possible to charge at work too (will probably me more common by 2035)

@Fandango1Jimmy @rockshotphotos @latimes 数量要少得多，有时也可以在工作中收费（到 2035 年我可能会更常见）

@bourbon8888 @ladybirdofpray @vanessainstem Those are only effective, somewhat, if you have the air stream blowing directly on your face.

@bourbon8888 @ladybirdofpray @vanessainstem 这些只有在气流直接吹在脸上时才有效。