Aeon 的最新消息

@vargh3se @holliemaea @kurteichenwald Appointed and confirmed. The confirmation process, if not partisan, means the candidates put forward are vetted by both branches and presumably both qualified and moderate. But when extreme epartisanship turns everything into a mud fight, it breaks down.

@vargh3se @holliemaea @kurteichenwald 已任命并确认。确认过程,如果不是党派,意味着提出的候选人经过两个分支的审查,并且可能是合格的和适度的。但是,当极端的党派关系将一切变成一场泥战时,它就会崩溃。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Noahpinion @Robotbeat It's only a 100k cut, that's why.

@Noahpinion @Robotbeat 这只是一个 100k 的剪辑,这就是原因。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@OXHarryH1 @AGoldsmithEsq @alexmeshkin Dead pool solves a lot of them if people can't.

@OXHarryH1 @AGoldsmithEsq @alexmeshkin 如果人们不能,死池可以解决很多问题。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@brianrtw @R_H_Ebright Even if we knew 100%, both are still possible.
There may be reasons to want to know, but "to make sure it won't happen again" is not one.

@brianrtw @R_H_Ebright 即使我们知道 100%,两者仍然是可能的。
可能有理由想知道,但“确保它不会再次发生”不是一个原因。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AGoldsmithEsq @OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin That could happen but more plausible is reduced inefficient growing of water-hungry crops in an area with a severe and chronic water shortage. 80% of water usage is agriculture (though not all of this is wasteful). There's probably enough for the rest without much desalination.

@AGoldsmithEsq @OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin 这可能会发生,但更合理的是在严重和长期缺水的地区减少缺水作物的低效种植。 80% 的用水量用于农业(尽管并非所有这些都是浪费的)。剩下的可能就足够了,没有太多的海水淡化。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin @nailatrahman This isn't as simple as you make it out to be. First most EV drivers can and should charge off-peak, but also some EVs even can feed back to the grid during power shortages, so more EVs may even help with these short term spikes in demand.

@alexmeshkin @nailatrahman 这并不像你想象的那么简单。首先,大多数电动汽车司机可以而且应该在非高峰时段充电,而且一些电动汽车甚至可以在电力短缺时回馈电网,因此更多电动汽车甚至可能有助于应对这些短期的需求高峰。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sophtwhere @SteveCr29145875 @nytimes It isn't. Congress can propose amendments without a convention.

@sophtwhere @SteveCr29145875 @nytimes 不是。国会可以在没有公约的情况下提出修正案。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DennisYWang @nytimes https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@drnik46 @nytimes 2/3 is just to call the convention. Would take 3/4 to be ratified. Good luck with that.

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@DennisYWang @nytimes https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@drnik46 @nytimes 2/3 只是为了调用约定。需要 3/4 才能获得批准。祝你好运。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@drnik46 @nytimes 2/3 is just to call the convention. Would take 3/4 to be ratified. Good luck with that.

@drnik46 @nytimes 2/3 只是为了调用约定。需要 3/4 才能获得批准。祝你好运。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin 20 years is interesting because that's when there were a series of EM currency crises.

@alexmeshkin 20 年很有趣,因为那时出现了一系列新兴市场货币危机。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin @DCDoc33 Trump got at least one and probably two boosters. Not saying that why he may not have had it again but it's different from the other case you mentioned.

@alexmeshkin @DCDoc33 特朗普至少得到了一个,可能还有两个助推器。并不是说为什么他可能再也没有了,但这与您提到的其他情况不同。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin @BCarfree Not in SF. Surrounding yes.

@alexmeshkin @BCarfree 不在旧金山。周边是的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@davetone007 @MeetJess Problem with insert filters in untested designs is the air can go around the filter, even if the filter is very good. I wouldn't use it without a quantitative fit test to know the actual protection factor.

@davetone007 @MeetJess 在未经测试的设计中插入过滤器的问题是空气可以绕过过滤器,即使过滤器非常好。如果没有定量拟合测试来了解实际保护系数,我不会使用它。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MishGEA Biden needs BOTH Manchin and Sinema to pass full on BBB, even assuming Dems manage to hold the House. 51-49 won't do it. 52-48 isn't impossible but much less likely.

@MishGEA 拜登需要 Manchin 和 Sinema 才能完全通过 BBB,即使假设 Dems 设法控制众议院。 51-49不会这样做。 52-48 并非不可能,但可能性要小得多。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SandraR06931127 @AmoneyResists @SkyNews @jaredkushner His shitty answer is not the story here. The story is that no American reporters will even demand answers to these questions. It's all softballs all the time.

@SandraR06931127 @AmoneyResists @SkyNews @jaredkushner 他糟糕的答案不是这里的故事。故事是,没有美国记者甚至会要求回答这些问题。一直都是垒球。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SteetcherBucket @jao_1989 @DouthatNYT What you call RINOs are exactly the center-right establishment Republicans that Ross urges Joe to compromise and work with. Ross just wants to pretend that didn't happen.

@SteetcherBucket @jao_1989 @DouthatNYT 你所说的 RINO 正是罗斯敦促乔妥协并与之合作的中右翼共和党建制派。罗斯只是想假装这没有发生。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dhjshi_shi @depthsofwiki It is is a swingy state which pursued aggressive covid policies more in keeping with harder blue states. There result was many protests and controversies, up to and including the plot to kidnap the governor. I don't know how that translates to wiki references though.

@dhjshi_shi @depthsofwiki 这是一个摇摆不定的州,它奉行激进的 covid 政策,更多地与更艰难的蓝色州保持一致。结果引发了许多抗议和争议,包括绑架州长的阴谋。不过,我不知道这如何转化为 wiki 参考。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MSantala1 @keletkert @Jim49516 @banjopatterson4 @AlexKokcharov @JayinKyiv This may apply as well https://t.co/BPzKpQiMja

@MSantala1 @keletkert @Jim49516 @banjopatterson4 @AlexKokcharov @JayinKyiv 这也可能适用 https://t.co/BPzKpQiMja

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情