Aeon 的最新消息
@MarvinH2_G2 @FinchTH Yes that's what I thought. Human studies on BA.1 which took more than two month, then the update BA.1->BA.5
BTW, how does the BA.4/BA.5 work? Is this some specially engineered sequence or is it just BA.5 but deemed to work on BA.4?
@MarvinH2_G2 @FinchTH 是的，我就是这么想的。 BA.1 的人体研究花了两个多月，然后更新 BA.1-
@FinchTH @nailatrahman https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@MarvinH2_G2 @FinchTH Wasn't there more of a study for the BA.1 booster?
Seems like BA.1 -> BA.5 booster increment might be reasonably seen as less of a leap.
@FinchTH @nailatrahman https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@MarvinH2_G2 @FinchTH 没有更多关于 BA.1 助推器的研究吗？
好像是 BA.1 -
@job_gyhb @__philipn__ @wsbgnl Similarly difficulty concentrating, diabetes, heart diseases, etc. These are disabling in various ways and to various disagrees. Disability isn't a binary between bed bound and fully recovered and just fine.
@job_gyhb @__philipn__ @wsbgnl 同样难以集中注意力，糖尿病，心脏病等。这些都以各种方式和各种不同意。残疾不是卧床和完全康复之间的二元，而且很好。
@job_gyhb @__philipn__ @wsbgnl Disablng doesn't mean bed bound. Someone who is easily and severely fatigued doing strenuous activities may be able to get out of bed an function to an extent, but is still disabled.
@job_gyhb @__philipn__ @wsbgnl Disablng 并不意味着卧床不起。进行剧烈活动时容易且严重疲劳的人可能能够在一定程度上起床，但仍处于残疾状态。
@saugarmaripuri It says that the USPS tests come from a stockpile that was purchased long ago for the purpose of having them on hand, something retailers don't usually do. In terms of effectiveness, they're supposedly fine much longer (I have no reason to doubt this).
@saugarmaripuri 它说 USPS 测试来自很久以前购买的库存，目的是让它们在手边，零售商通常不会这样做。就有效性而言，它们应该可以使用更长的时间（我没有理由怀疑这一点）。
@Molnarokek @ProfBardLaw "with higher level protection" is pretty clear.
Also https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru... https://t.co/8Wd1bkyLLe
@Molnarokek @ProfBardLaw “具有更高级别的保护”非常清楚。
还有 发表时间：3年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin详情
@AbraarKaran https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@GYamey And actual concerted high-impact and high-capability booster campaign in the US would be the first. But I doubt it will happen. "Booster campaign" is US-speak for "go get one if you want one".
发表时间：3年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@AbraarKaran https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@GYamey 在美国实际协调一致的高影响力和高能力助推器活动将是第一个。但我怀疑它会发生。 “助推器活动”是美国的说法，即“如果你想要一个就去买一个”。
@Molnarokek @ProfBardLaw CDC has addressed that, hospitals don't want to listen.
https://www.aha.org/news/headl...
@Molnarokek @ProfBardLaw CDC 已经解决了这个问题，医院不想听。
https:// /www.aha.org/news/headl...
@chriswaterguy @DrEricDing @citlanx @masknerd In that case you're probably an exception to a good fit. You're probably better off trying something else like an elastomeric (flo mask or envomask are less 'industrial' looking than 3M, etc.), particularly if it comes in multiple sizes.
@chriswaterguy @DrEricDing @citlanx @masknerd 在那种情况下，你可能是一个很好的例外。你可能最好尝试其他的东西，比如弹性体（flo mask 或 envomask 看起来不像 3M 那样“工业”，等等），特别是如果它有多种尺寸。
@chriswaterguy @DrEricDing @citlanx @masknerd If you put it on correctly and have a subjectively "good" fit with something like Aura it would probably pass a fit test. Pass rates are very high. Other studies show that "good" fit with N95 without fit testing is still much better than surgical, though doesn't apply to this one
@chriswaterguy @DrEricDing @citlanx @masknerd 如果您正确佩戴它并且主观上“良好”地适合Aura之类的东西，它可能会通过适合性测试。通过率非常高。其他研究表明，没有适合度测试的 N95 的“良好”适合度仍然比手术好得多，但不适用于这个