@DreddanGamer @TylorStankley @hostiledesign Yes the flat grates provide ventilation, but the raised grates are installed in certain specific locations to reduce flooding.
https://archive.nytimes.com/ci... https://t.co/DogHCSjTTw

@DreddanGamer @TylorStankley @hostiledesign 是的，平面格栅提供通风，但凸起的格栅安装在某些特定位置以减少洪水。
https://archive.nytimes.com/ci... https://t.co/DogHCSjTTw

@whilomm @USPS You're right. I never thought about it but it's really stupid not to mention that on the web site.

@whilomm @USPS 你是对的。我从没想过，但在网站上不提这个真的很愚蠢。

@DisabledDem https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DisabledDem https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DisabledDem https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DisabledDem https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@SetTheorist @Guesasaurio @hostiledesign The raised design is to reduce rainwater draining into the subways and flooding them.

@SetTheorist @Guesasaurio @hostiledesign 凸起的设计是为了减少雨水流入地铁并淹没它们。

@TylorStankley @DreddanGamer @hostiledesign The grates are needed to ventilate the subway tunnels. They're raised to reduce rain draining into the subways and flooding them.

@TylorStankley @DreddanGamer @hostiledesign 需要格栅来给地铁隧道通风。它们被抬高以减少雨水流入地铁并淹没它们。

@MarvinH2_G2 Ventilating is cheaper. It would be ironic if obscene energy costs is what finally got schools to give up on 2020s "can't handle being cold" snoflakism and told kids to bundle up.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/0...

@MarvinH2_G2 通风更便宜。如果淫秽的能源成本最终让学校放弃了 2020 年代“无法忍受寒冷”的吹嘘主义并告诉孩子们捆绑起来，那将是具有讽刺意味的。
https://www.nytimes.com /2020/0...

@sleepyknave @DisabledDem Reminder that most people (if not uninsured) can still get 8 free tests per month from their medical insurance or from medicare.

@sleepyknave @DisabledDem 提醒大多数人（如果没有保险）仍然可以每月从他们的医疗保险或医疗保险中获得 8 次免费测试。

@whilomm https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@whilomm https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@whilomm @USPS Those are extended https://malheurhealth.org/2022...

@whilomm @USPS 这些是扩展的 https://malheurhealth .org/2022...

@olga_basso @MeetJess 100% out of 50 is essentially 100%, at least assuming the 50 weren't chosen in some heavily biased way.

@olga_basso @MeetJess 100% out of 50 基本上是 100%，至少假设这 50 个不是以某种严重偏见的方式选择的。

@seungminkim @bhrenton Not mentioning that almost everyone in the US can still get 8 free rapid at-home tests per month from insurance or medicare is misleading and unhelpful. Without that context, the headline suggests all free home testing to end, which isn't true.

@seungminkim @bhrenton 更不用说美国几乎每个人仍然可以每月从保险或医疗保险中获得 8 次免费的快速在家测试，这是误导和无益的。没有这种背景，标题就暗示所有免费的家庭测试都将结束，这是不正确的。

@NuritBaytch @sdbaral @grahamwalker 2017
https://soranews24.com/2017/03...

@NuritBaytch @sdbaral @grahamwalker 2017
https://soranews24. com/2017/03...

@naval Conspiracy and incentives are often the same thing.

@naval 阴谋和激励往往是一回事。

@thumbhatguy @wsbgnl Go troll in another thread where it might be accidentally coherent with the discussion.

@thumbhatguy @wsbgnl 在另一个线程中进行巨魔，它可能与讨论不小心一致。

@mildanalyst "Covid-style" measures but not, gasp, covid measures.

@mildanalyst “Covid 式”措施，但不是，喘不过气来，covid 措施。

@FinchTH @sameo416 It depends how much and how rapidly cognitive capacity declines due to long covid. If the lines don't cross...then never.

@FinchTH @sameo416 这取决于长期covid导致认知能力下降的程度和速度。如果界线不交叉......那么永远不会。

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis There is no question that border controls are expensive. But the are still places that never would really do for real it even when whole economies were shut down. It's almost an article of faith (that you hear repeated by all the "PH experts" every time) that they "don't work".

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis 毫无疑问，边境管制的成本很高。但是，即使整个经济体都关闭了，这些地方也永远不会真正做到这一点。他们“不起作用”几乎是一种信念（你每次都听到所有“PH专家”重复）。

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis US and UK were mostly a natural immunity strategy. Vaccines were expected to be too late and not that effective. Goal was to MAXIMIZE infection to speed up herd immunity. Trials went much faster than expected (due to high community spread) and results were better than expected.

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis 美国和英国主要是一种自然免疫策略。预计疫苗为时已晚，而且效果不佳。目标是最大化感染以加速群体免疫。试验进行得比预期快得多（由于社区传播程度高），结果也好于预期。

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis The mental and policy block around travel controls seems to be evaluating them w/wrong goal, of "keeping it out". You see this in most of the pre-covid pandemic plans, at least the western/WHO ones: "Travel controls ineffective and not recommended because they only delay entry"

@mskathleenquinn @greg_travis 围绕旅行控制的心理和政策障碍似乎正在以错误的目标评估它们，即“将其排除在外”。您在大多数新冠病毒大流行之前的计划中都看到了这一点，至少是西方/世界卫生组织的计划：“旅行控制无效且不推荐，因为它们只会延迟入境”