@saugarmaripuri So-called expired tests are usually not expired. The original very conservative expiration dates have been extended.
https://www.latimes.com/califo...

@saugarmaripuri 所谓的过期测试通常不会过期。原来非常保守的到期日期已经延长。
https://www.latimes.com/califo...

@saugarmaripuri https://twitter.com/maudi63/st...

@saugarmaripuri https://twitter.com/maudi63/st...

@EthereanMaximus @PWCR13 @VentureCoinist @ODELL That's not really true. Land value tax can pay for all public works and isn't evadable.

@EthereanMaximus @PWCR13 @VentureCoinist @ODELL 这不是真的。地价税可以支付所有公共工程，并且是不可逃避的。

@omnicronicles @AreNifty @Noahpinion US has a lower vaccination rate, and that impacts deaths, 100% true. But high deaths in 2021 was not due only to that US-specific factor, also true.

@omnicronicles @AreNifty @Noahpinion 美国的疫苗接种率较低，这会影响死亡人数，100% 正确。但 2021 年的高死亡人数不仅是由于美国特有的因素，也是如此。

@collings314 @ianbremmer Will it include ONE juror who won't convict for similar political reasons?

@collings314 @ianbremmer 是否会包括一位不会因类似政治原因而定罪的陪审员？

@scottjla @ianbremmer To convict, you need a jury without even one person treating it as political.

@scottjla @ianbremmer 要定罪，你需要一个陪审团，甚至没有一个人将其视为政治。

@omnicronicles @AreNifty @Noahpinion This implies about 1/3 of the impact is US-specific including US antivax, compared with say UK which has a very high vax rate and especially very high in older people. But even that is not all antivax. There are other differences including lack of a universal health system.

@omnicronicles @AreNifty @Noahpinion 这意味着大约 1/3 的影响是美国特有的，包括美国的 antivax，而英国的 vax 率非常高，尤其是在老年人中非常高。但即便如此，也不全是antivax。还有其他差异，包括缺乏普遍的卫生系统。

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin https://www.fda.gov/news-event...

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin https://www.fda.gov/news-event...

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin Correct but the quoted thread is referring to the US

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin 正确，但引用的线程指的是美国

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin It is, he's mistaken as to variant, but the rest is right.

@John_Kenney @alexmeshkin 是的，他被误认为是变体，但其余的都是正确的。

@0xOnlySimps @EricTopol @FT @SarahNev @federicacocco 10 per 1000 is 1%, not 0.1%

@0xOnlySimps @EricTopol @FT @SarahNev @federicacocco 每 1000 人中有 10 人是 1%，而不是 0.1%

@BenMazer At the population level you have to offset this against the number of people highly vulnerable to these conditions who died from covid itself.

@BenMazer 在人口水平上，您必须将其与因新冠病毒本身而死亡的极易感染这些疾病的人数相抵消。

@barttels2 @AndrewNoymer @sinafala 👀

@barttels2 @AndrewNoymer @sinafala 👀

@Michael59503746 @CassandraNoCov @coniinthegarden @gregggonsalves @TerryAdirimMD @SenGillibrand @TheDemocrats @WhiteHouse @POTUS @WHCOS Well that sucks. Pretty sad that the wealthiest nation in the history of the world can't do any better than that.

@Michael59503746 @CassandraNoCov @coniinthegarden @gregggonsalves @TerryAdirimMD @SenGillibrand @TheDemocrats @WhiteHouse @POTUS @WHCOS 好烂。很遗憾，世界历史上最富有的国家不能做得比这更好。

@0xfbifemboy @izebel_eth @0xhyacinths He's saying that if you short google and apple outperforms google you are fucked. If it goes the other way you may lose your job. So also fucked.
Shorting broad tech index probably a bit better, if allowed.

@0xfbifemboy @izebel_eth @0xhyacinths 他说如果你做空谷歌，而苹果的表现优于谷歌，你就完蛋了。如果情况相反，您可能会失去工作。所以也搞砸了。
如果允许的话，做空广泛的科技指数可能会好一些。

@Michael59503746 @CassandraNoCov @coniinthegarden @gregggonsalves @TerryAdirimMD @SenGillibrand @TheDemocrats @WhiteHouse @POTUS @WHCOS I don't know where 'here' is but it seems people getting PCR at the major pharmacy chains like CVS are getting results back in a day or two.

@Michael59503746 @CassandraNoCov @coniinthegarden @gregggonsalves @TerryAdirimMD @SenGillibrand @TheDemocrats @WhiteHouse @POTUS @WHCOS 我不知道“这里”在哪里，但似乎人们在像 CVS 这样的主要药房连锁店接受 PCR 会在一天内得到结果或两个。

@NickPinkston @BrianHauerTSO @wilgieseler @Noahpinion @alxcharlesdukes Probably depends a lot on the driving mix. Regen breaking is probably a big part of why so many taxis/uber drive a Prius (also reduced cost of brake service), but much less benefit for long distance driving.

@NickPinkston @BrianHauerTSO @wilgieseler @Noahpinion @alxcharlesdukes 可能很大程度上取决于驾驶组合。再生制动可能是为什么这么多出租车/优步驾驶普锐斯（也降低了制动服务成本）的重要部分，但对于长途驾驶的好处要少得多。

@EntropyChase @therobotjames "Future dividends".
"Future" is doing a lot of work here. It's a whole timeline.

@EntropyChase @therobotjames“未来红利”。
“未来”在这里做了很多工作。这是一个完整的时间线。

@EntropyChase @therobotjames There are multiple events with a div=0 stock that could change in the future. Buyout for cash or stock, change in management/dividend policy, special dividend. Also buybacks but those really only matter to the extent that the others do.

@EntropyChase @therobotjames 有多个 div=0 股票的事件将来可能会发生变化。现金或股票收购、管理/股息政策变更、特别股息。回购也是如此，但那些真的只在其他人做的程度上很重要。

@wideofthepost There is no such thing as a good cop who protects a bad cop.

@wideofthepost 没有保护坏警察的好警察。