@Lujan588 @CT_Bergstrom @cvspharmacy Free to the patient. There has always been an provider fee paid either by insurance or by the federal government.

@Lujan588 @CT_Bergstrom @cvspharmacy 对患者免费。始终存在由保险或联邦政府支付的提供者费用。

@ahappything @igorbobic Always going to be polarization on these issues but +20 on independents is very signfiicant.

@ahappything @igorbobic 在这些问题上总是两极分化，但 20 对独立人士是非常重要的。

@tax_oz @sjbirdwatcher @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks No, that's not how life expectancy works at all. Life expectancy for a 90 year old is not negative. Every covid death would have lived longer but for covid. People dying sooner, regardless of age, reduces the average.

@tax_oz @sjbirdwatcher @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 不，这根本不是预期寿命的运作方式。 90岁的预期寿命不是负数。如果不是因为新冠病毒，每一次新冠病毒的死亡都会活得更久。无论年龄大小，人们越早死亡，平均水平就越低。

@ariehkovler 'supplements to customer bills' likely just means tax, meaning new players' customers will be taxed too.
World record pivot from tax cuts to enormous tax increase.

@ariehkovler '补充客户账单'可能只是意味着税收，这意味着新玩家的客户也将被征税。
世界纪录从减税转向大幅增税。

@TheStalwart @Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham Okay, fair.

@TheStalwart @Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham 好的，公平的。

@Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @TheStalwart @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham And Joe?

@Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @TheStalwart @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham 和乔？

@Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @TheStalwart @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham I don't understand why so many smart people are confused by this.

@Frances_Coppola @ajb_powell @TheStalwart @JavierBlas @PracKapital @alexwickham 我不明白为什么这么多聪明人对此感到困惑。

@TheStalwart I mean it's just deficit spending (or off-budget debt guarantee, same thing), nothing special. Why is this confusing?

@TheStalwart我的意思是这只是赤字支出（或预算外债务担保，同样的事情），没什么特别的。为什么这令人困惑？

@TheStalwart Some lender.

@TheStalwart 一些贷方。

@taipan168 @nerodenc @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks I'm not saying don't do it. I'm saying that clean air is merit enough, and it's easy to measure directly. You don't need an indirect statistical study to understand that any more than you do to understand whether a modification to a race car increases speed. Just measure it.

@taipan168 @nerodenc @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 我不是说不要这样做。我是说干净的空气就足够了，而且很容易直接测量。您无需进行间接统计研究即可了解这一点，就像您了解对赛车的修改是否会提高速度一样。只是测量它。

@taipan168 @nerodenc @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks There's nothing wrong with studies, science is good, but there is no logical reason why that is needed in this instance in practice.
Stop sealioning.

@taipan168 @nerodenc @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 研究没有错，科学是好的，但在实践中这种情况下没有逻辑上的理由。
停止海豹捕猎。

@taipan168 @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks That's a baseline, you can go from there. Two boxes appear much better than one for many spaces. Still negligible cost.
This trial is ongoing BTW, so we'll see
https://caer.org.uk/projects/a...

@taipan168 @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 这是一个基线，你可以从那里开始。对于许多空间，两个盒子看起来比一个盒子好得多。仍然可以忽略不计的成本。
顺便说一句，这项试验正在进行中，所以我们会看到
https://caer.org.uk/projects/a...

@taipan168 @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks The costs are negligible, and there are clear benefits to cleaner air regardless. If they might work, and both mechanistic and observational studies are enough to say they probably do, that's good enough.

@taipan168 @OXHarryH1 @tax_oz @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 成本可以忽略不计，无论如何清洁空气都有明显的好处。如果它们可能起作用，并且机械和观察研究都足以说明它们可能起作用，那就足够了。

@JingoJackson @kencf0618 @EbonyJHilton_MD Just search google for 'ear saver masks'. There are a few different kinds, but they're all some kind of strap or clip that goes behind your head and holds the loops instead of your ears.

@JingoJackson @kencf0618 @EbonyJHilton_MD 只需在谷歌搜索“护耳面具”。有几种不同的类型，但它们都是某种带子或夹子，放在您的头后并固定环而不是您的耳朵。

@AlfTheGreat @travelsmitty @EbonyJHilton_MD Home Depot paint department for a few different models of 3M N95s.

@AlfTheGreat @travelsmitty @EbonyJHilton_MD Home Depot 油漆部门为一些不同型号的 3M N95s。

@amlivemon I think this is referring to the boxes that were returned. Look at the date.

@amlivemon 我认为这是指退回的盒子。看日期。

@michaelzlin Fascinating.

@michaelzlin 迷人。

@Guglar9 @michaelzlin Lots of masking in KR too.

@Guglar9 @michaelzlin 在 KR 中也有很多掩蔽。

@AshleyGWinter Things that wouldn't exist but for social media virality for $100.

@AshleyGWinter 如果不是 100 美元的社交媒体病毒式传播，这些东西就不存在了。

@dstuf @RandallBurns5 @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks One caution. You can't necessarily different variants express the same way in wastewater, nor constant dilution, so comparing levels/peaks between variants is questionable. I do think current levels are likely higher in practice, it's just not a strong conclusion from the graphs

@dstuf @RandallBurns5 @michaelmina_lab @mbrushstocks 一个警告。不同的变体不一定会在废水中以相同的方式表达，也不一定会持续稀释，因此比较变体之间的水平/峰值是有问题的。我确实认为目前的水平在实践中可能更高，只是从图表中得出的结论并不强烈