Aeon 的最新消息

@Noahpinion Mariupol

@Noahpinion 马里乌波尔

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SwannMarcus89 @Noahpinion Cities haven't major homeless problems including being overrun with encampments did not EVEN REMOTELY start in June of 2020.
https://www.latimes.com/califo... https://t.co/nWhF9bXu4m

@SwannMarcus89 @Noahpinion 城市没有出现重大的无家可归问题,包括营地泛滥,甚至没有在 2020 年 6 月远程启动。
https://www.latimes.com /califo... https://t.co/nWhF9bXu4m

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Noahpinion @ScottyIsAbroad It's actually the opposite. If a city were destroyed, many of the homeless would leave.

@Noahpinion @ScottyIsAbroad 实际上恰恰相反。如果一座城市被摧毁,许多无家可归者就会离开。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RossettiAllen @Lujan588 @Courtzilla @AshishKJha46 Well that's a start. If Jha would tell people to wear a mask in essential places, it would be a lot less odd than him erasing the word from his vocabulary.

@RossettiAllen @Lujan588 @Courtzilla @AshishKJha46 嗯,这是一个开始。如果 Jha 会告诉人们在重要的地方要戴口罩,那将比他从词汇表中删除这个词要少得多。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JoelFarran @calsandy @Courtzilla @AshishKJha46 Elections have consequences

@JoelFarran @calsandy @Courtzilla @AshishKJha46 选举有后果

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl It's also canceled as an issue when both parties have the same policy. Happens a lot.

@wsbgnl 当双方有相同的政策时,它也会被取消。发生很多。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justthefacts85 "until I test negative"

@justthefacts85 “直到我测试阴性”

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@0xfbifemboy Consider comps https://t.co/cuNgvyiF1d

@0xfbifemboy 考虑组合 https://t.co/cuNgvyiF1d

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MichaelSFuhrer @taipan168 Nasal vax likely has significant advantage in terms of distribution. People don't really like needles (but many tolerate), giving the shot requires some specialized skill, etc. Take a puff on an inhaler, whatever. I'll take a puff every month if it'll help me, no biggie.

@MichaelSFuhrer @taipan168 Nasal vax 在分布方面可能具有显着优势。人们并不真正喜欢针头(但许多人容忍),打针需要一些专业技能,等等。用吸入器吸一口,无论如何。如果对我有帮助,我每个月都会吸一口,没什么大不了的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@drensber @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 There's only 2-2.5 years of experience and after the first year Omicron showed up which definitely reduced protection against severe disease quite a lot. The other data shows some reduction, not remotely to the point of having no immunity, but worse than a recent boost.

@drensber @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 只有 2-2.5 年的经验,并且在第一年 Omicron 出现之后,这无疑大大降低了对严重疾病的保护。其他数据显示有所减少,虽然远没有达到没有免疫力的地步,但比最近的提升还要糟糕。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ParentMishmash @_TheAncientOne_ @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 Respectfully, I think we're ultimately going to find out that Novavax isn't the panacea you think it is. Be skeptical of a few small trials. mRNA looked way better that way too.
But they should let people use it as a booster, current policy is dumb.

@ParentMishmash @_TheAncientOne_ @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 恕我直言,我想我们最终会发现 Novavax 不是你认为的灵丹妙药。对一些小试验持怀疑态度。 mRNA看起来也好得多。
但他们应该让人们将其用作助推器,目前的政策是愚蠢的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AltMiddlePeds @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 Bad framing in the sense that it isn't 'necessary' for anyone. Assess costs and benefits.

@AltMiddlePeds @Bob_Wachter @AshishKJha46 糟糕的框架,因为它对任何人都不是“必要的”。评估成本和收益。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@thechancellor6 @DFisman And of course there is no meaningful difference whatsoever against severe disease (with three doses), which seems to be what most or all the western experts are now proclaiming "is what we really care about".

@thechancellor6 @DFisman 当然,对于严重疾病(三剂)没有任何有意义的区别,这似乎是大多数或所有西方专家现在宣称的“是我们真正关心的”。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@thechancellor6 @DFisman Thats not true at all. There is more overlap than not. The most you could conclude with reasonable confidence is that they might be a little better, before immunity against infection or mild disease wanes after 3-6 months when little or no protection from either vaccine.

@thechancellor6 @DFisman 这根本不是真的。有更多的重叠而不是没有。您可以有合理信心得出的结论是,它们可能会好一点,在 3-6 个月后对感染或轻度疾病的免疫力减弱之前,这两种疫苗几乎没有或没有保护作用。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dbdugger @AshishKJha46 Almost like, it's systemic.

@dbdugger @AshishKJha46 几乎是系统性的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @n_hold Im not even sure about the latter at this point. It's spin over EVERYTHING, even including economics.

@wsbgnl @n_hold 我现在甚至不确定后者。它超越了一切,甚至包括经济学。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@n_hold @dj1au @wsbgnl ⛽️💡

@n_hold @dj1au @wsbgnl ⛽️💡

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl Even after Omicron emerged and the urgency of boosters became clear to the point where other countries (including ones hardly known for their covid response) deployed the military to rapidly mass vax, they did nothing but spin their "tools".
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl 1.5 million doses per day. Not all boosters. If it were, that would boost the population in 6 months or so.
Appointments take weeks to get in high demand areas.
UK deploying army to help with mass vax. US? 🦗🦗
Utter fail.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@wsbgnl 即使在 Omicron 出现并且助推器的紧迫性变得明显到其他国家(包括那些鲜为人知的应对新冠病毒的国家)部署军队以迅速大规模使用 vax 之后,他们什么也没做,只是旋转他们的“工具”。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl 每天 150 万剂。不是所有的助推器。如果是这样,那将在 6 个月左右的时间里增加人口。
约会需要数周时间才能进入高需求地区。
英国部署军队帮助大规模 vax。我们? 🦗🦗
彻底失败。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SDEnyaRedRain @AllysonOtten @TitleChase @BaddCompani It's a current list of declared or widely known and accepted. There are a bunch more unknown/threshold states.

@SDEnyaRedRain @AllysonOtten @TitleChase @BaddCompani 这是已声明或广为人知和接受的当前列表。还有很多未知/阈值状态。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情