@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto It says right in that article that people have been seeing clots since 2020, before vaccines. Exactly as I told you before.

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto 在那篇文章中说得对，自 2020 年以来，人们一直在看到凝块，那时还没有疫苗。就像我之前告诉你的那样。

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto I don't know. I don't know if we'll ever know.
It's here we need to deal with it. That seems to be the most important concern now.

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto 我不知道。我不知道我们是否会知道。
在这里，我们需要处理它。这似乎是现在最重要的问题。

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto Nothing there about clots. Stop posting antivax nonsense.

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto 没有关于凝块的内容。停止发布antivax废话。

@tnicholsmd If you were someone inclined to have done that, you most certainly would not be someone inclined to sit the rest out.

@tnicholsmd 如果您是倾向于这样做的人，那么您肯定不会是倾向于坐在外面的人。

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto Clots were recognized as an effect of covid in 2020, long before any fo the vaccines existed. Stop spreading antivax nonsense.
https://labblog.uofmhealth.org... https://t.co/7js6ER5jU3

@AdofoAswad @CassandraNoCov @5gentexan @ChuckCallesto 凝块在 2020 年被认为是 covid 的影响，早在任何疫苗出现之前。停止传播antivax废话。
https://labblog.uofmhealth.org ... https://t.co/7js6ER5jU3

@AShihipar There's no fish in that, so it's all good.

@AShihipar 里面没有鱼，所以一切都很好。

@loscharlos There is a small difference in the point estimate, and there might be an actual difference, but at best it is small, too small to tease out given the size of this study.

@loscharlos 点估计存在微小差异，可能存在实际差异，但充其量只是很小，考虑到这项研究的规模，太小而无法梳理。

@jasonfurman @GregorMacdonald Where is the data on CEOs almost all hating it?
There are some highly visible noisy ones who hate it, yes. Is that generalizable?

@jasonfurman @GregorMacdonald 几乎所有 CEO 都讨厌它的数据在哪里？
有一些非常明显的吵闹的人讨厌它，是的。这可以概括吗？

@piningforvacay @justthefacts85 Shoo bot.

@piningforvacay @justthefacts85 Shoo 机器人。

@WBahnfleth @joeyfox85 @DavidElfstrom @amandalhu @sameo416 @Poppendieck There is a compelling public interest in releasing some form of those results without delay. I mean I guess you just did, but perhaps a bit beyond that.

@WBahnfleth @joeyfox85 @DavidElfstrom @amandalhu @sameo416 @Poppendieck 毫不拖延地发布某种形式的结果符合公众的强烈兴趣。我的意思是我猜你刚刚做了，但也许有点超出了。

@DrPieterPeach @joeyfox85 I don't know about 5x but it is definitely a lot bigger. Both are cylindrical filters (airflow out to in), and the HM filter is both bigger diameter and thickness. HM also includes a LOT of activated carbon for gas/odor reduction. LV filter has much less carbon.

@DrPieterPeach @joeyfox85 我不知道 5 倍，但肯定要大得多。两者都是圆柱形过滤器（气流由外向内），而 HM 过滤器的直径和厚度都更大。 HM 还包括大量用于减少气体/气味的活性炭。 LV 过滤器的碳含量要少得多。

@gtrietsc @TRyanGregory @denise_dewald Not particularly. There are enough expats living in China and enough of a trickle of travel that we would know if covid were rampant in China or was ever rampant. The exact numbers might be wrong but qualitatively, low/no covid has never been wrong past mid 2020.

@gtrietsc @TRyanGregory @denise_dewald 不是特别。有足够多的外国人生活在中国，也有足够多的旅行，我们会知道新冠病毒在中国是否猖獗或曾经猖獗。确切的数字可能是错误的，但从质量上讲，在 2020 年中期之后，低/无新冠病毒从未出现过错误。

@Skogsfrun13 @ProfBardLaw @aetiology There's no financial interest behind wearing a mask under the nose. I mean maybe the nose ring lobby, but seriously, just no.

@Skogsfrun13 @ProfBardLaw @aetiology 在鼻子下面戴口罩没有经济利益。我的意思是也许是鼻环大厅，但说真的，只是没有。

@ProfBardLaw @aetiology Even setting that aside (I know, but let's say), putting obviously wrong methods of wearing next to the word "Yes" is just insane. It's public miseducation.

@ProfBardLaw @aetiology 即使把它放在一边（我知道，但可以这么说），在“是”这个词旁边加上明显错误的穿着方法只是疯了。这是公开的错误教育。

@BronxLaugher @bmtopol Exactly, celebrity endorsements work, that's why they've been used since forever.

@BronxLaugher @bmtopol 没错，名人代言很有效，这就是为什么它们一直被使用的原因。

@bmtopol @yashar Not being a tequila expert (most aren't), so choose on familiarity, the same reason brand advertising exists at all.

@bmtopol @yashar 不是龙舌兰酒专家（大多数都不是），所以选择熟悉度，这与品牌广告存在的原因相同。

@yashar They're not immune to business failure and some of these will fail in time, but they are monetizing those 2 billion followers, which is an asset with high value.

@yashar 他们无法避免业务失败，其中一些会及时失败，但他们正在通过这 20 亿追随者获利，这是一项高价值的资产。

@theyareus2 @alexmeshkin Moderna did some testing on mRNA flu vaccine (actually it was a combined one) and it was about the same effectiveness as regular flu vaccines. But it does have the advantage of potentially combined into one shot.

@theyareus2 @alexmeshkin Moderna 对 mRNA 流感疫苗进行了一些测试（实际上它是一种联合疫苗），它与普通流感疫苗的效果大致相同。但它确实具有可能合并为一枪的优势。

@drensber @John_Kenney @alexmeshkin Moderna and Novavax (and probably Pfizer but I haven't seen it) have been testing combined jabs.

@drensber @John_Kenney @alexmeshkin Moderna 和 Novavax（可能还有辉瑞，但我没见过）一直在测试联合刺拳。

@_Eric_Reinhart It's also quite often made up bullshit about "where people are", either contrary to actual evidence or lacking evidence entirely.

@_Eric_Reinhart 它也经常编造关于“人们在哪里”的废话，要么与实际证据相反，要么完全缺乏证据。