@Peejay213 @DrZoeHyde Measurement removing 70% of aerosol particles with cheap cloth masks. PFE certification on surgical masks, usually 90%+ is measured at 0.1 microns, about the size of a virus. Actual aerosol particles carrying viruses are much larger.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Peejay213 @DrZoeHyde 测量用廉价的布口罩去除 70% 的气溶胶颗粒。外科口罩的 PFE 认证，通常 90% 是在 0.1 微米测量的，大约是病毒的大小。携带病毒的实际气溶胶颗粒要大得多。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@lagunaqueen @Peejay213 @DrZoeHyde This is disinformation. You should delete it.

@lagunaqueen @Peejay213 @DrZoeHyde 这是虚假信息。你应该删除它。

@dagambla03 @mintamolly 100% could fix, just have a state and local government that hasn't wanted to.

@dagambla03 @mintamolly 100% 可以修复，只是有一个州和地方政府不想这样做。

@meridithmcgraw @SalehaMohsin Okay but it could be just as bad or worse without looking any different from normal water. Focusing on appearance is misguided.

@meridithmcgraw @SalehaMohsin 好的，但是看起来与普通水没有任何不同，它可能同样糟糕或更糟。注重外表是错误的。

@regardthefrost @DrEricDing Adjusting directly from the demographic pyramid would only make sense if infection and disease severity were uniform and all ages had equal risks apart from age, but that's not the case.

@regardthefrost @DrEricDing 仅当感染和疾病严重程度一致并且所有年龄段除年龄外具有相同风险时，直接从人口金字塔进行调整才有意义，但事实并非如此。

@regardthefrost @DrEricDing Age adjusting in tricky. In fact deaths in Florida are disproportionately middle aged, because elderly are more vaccinated, and also had lower infection rates pre-vaccine (Florida has very low per-capita nursing home population, most live independently, easier to isolate).

@regardthefrost @DrEricDing 年龄调整很棘手。事实上，佛罗里达州的死亡人数不成比例地是中年人，因为老年人接种的疫苗较多，而且疫苗接种前的感染率也较低（佛罗里达州的人均疗养院人口非常低，大多数人独立生活，更容易隔离）。

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne No one is blaming, especially not blaming individual Chinese people.
Nevertheless, total amount is what affects the earth and that is increasingly in the hands of the Chinese government.

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 没有人在指责，尤其是不要指责个别中国人。
然而，总量是影响地球的因素，而且越来越多地掌握在中国政府手中。

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne Right, because it mostly isn't the population driving the increases, as you point out. And the rapidly urbanizing population is relatively efficient too. It is government policies driving the emissions, which is all the more reason to focus at the country level.

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 是的，因为正如您所指出的，推动增长的主要不是人口。快速城市化的人口也相对有效。推动排放的是政府政策，这更有理由关注国家层面。

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne The per capita emissions are converging and most of the reason for the enormous rise in China isn't 3x more people, it is building coal plants and stimulating its economy by overbuilding (also a problem for China!)
The last part you wrote is wrong
https://twitter.com/Noahpinion...

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 人均排放量正在趋同，中国大幅增长的主要原因不是人口增加了 3 倍，而是建造燃煤电厂并通过过度建设来刺激经济（这也是中国的一个问题！ )
你写的最后一部分是错误的
https://twitter.com/Noahpinion...

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne Even on the PER-CAPITA chart, the lines cross very soon (longer for India). And earth doesn't care about per-capita. You have to solve the problem where the emissions are. Most of the emissions are in China. End of story.

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 即使在 PER-CAPITA 图表上，线条也很快交叉（印度更长）。地球并不关心人均。你必须解决排放的问题。大部分排放在中国。故事结局。

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne Look at the chart man, nobody is delaying anything.

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 看看图表人，没有人在拖延任何事情。

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne Look at the trajectory. Extrapolate even a few years. It's not hard.

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 看看轨迹。甚至推断几年。这并不难。

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne The conversation is about the total amount emitted to the planet. If US reduced to ZERO, it would be less than what China (and India) add over several years. You can't solve this problem entirely or even primarily the lower TOTAL emitting countries (yes they can help).

@MilitantHobo @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 谈话是关于排放到地球的总量。如果美国减少到零，那将少于中国（和印度）在几年内增加的数量。您无法完全解决这个问题，甚至无法主要解决总排放量较低的国家（是的，他们可以提供帮助）。

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne And if that were done it would reduce emissions TO THE PLANET, by about 4 GT. While China is emitting 11 GT and rising at a furious rate. It is the total that matters.
If US reduced to ZERO (implausible), it would be less of a reduction than China has adds in several years.

@noobkidloko @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 如果这样做，它将减少对地球的排放，大约 4 GT。而中国正在排放 11 GT 并以惊人的速度增长。重要的是总数。
如果美国减少到零（难以置信），那么减少的幅度将小于中国几年来增加的幅度。

@Dominik_S_D @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne No that's not why.
https://twitter.com/Noahpinion...

@Dominik_S_D @Marco_Piani @Noahpinion @OestaOne 不，这不是原因。
https://twitter.com/Noahpinion...

@wholelife180 @ChristosArgyrop Lucira competes with them but is even more expensive. I think I saw another one as well, but I can't remember the name.

@wholelife180 @ChristosArgyrop Lucira 与他们竞争，但价格更高。我想我也看到了另一个，但我不记得名字了。

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion Look at the chart.

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion 看看图表。

@HammerstoneMar3 @BusinessInsider My god these stories are so dumb.
By "creator" it means he forked Bitcoin and did five minutes of edits and a meme.
If he decided after that "effort" that he isn't interested in it any more, why insist on dragging him back into it?

@HammerstoneMar3 @BusinessInsider 天哪，这些故事太愚蠢了。
“创造者”是指他分叉了比特币并做了五分钟的编辑和一个表情包。
如果他在“努力”之后决定不再对它感兴趣，为什么还要坚持把他拉回来？

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion You could probably make a case for some sort of financial compensation based on cumulative. Fine, negotiate it. But you better negotiate something where the larger CURRENT emitters cut one way or another.

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion 您可能会提出基于累积的某种经济补偿的理由。好吧，商量一下。但是你最好协商一些较大的电流发射器以一种或另一种方式切割的东西。

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion Probably, I don't know how it compares with e.g. trucks. The point being that 73% is NOT transpiration. It's agriculture, manufacturing, construction, etc

@acruiz @dangroshev @WitchKing03 @Noahpinion 可能，我不知道它与例如卡车。关键是 73% 不是蒸腾作用。农业、制造业、建筑业等