@BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait What part of ill advised was not clear. It was a dumb thing to say, said by a politician, that was walked back by the actual experts within hours.

@BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不良建议的哪一部分尚不清楚。一位政治家说，这是一件愚蠢的事情，但在几个小时内就被真正的专家收回了。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait First released. Several were tested in 2021 and 2022. I linked the report from the BA.1 trial in another reply.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 首次发布。有几个在 2021 年和 2022 年进行了测试。我在另一个回复中链接了 BA.1 试验的报告。

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Clinical trial of BA.1 bivalent vaccine.
"Phase 2/3 trial found that a booster dose of both Omicron-adapted vaccine candidates elicited a substantially higher immune response against Omicron BA.1 as compared to the companies’ current COVID-19 vaccine" https://www.pfizer.com/news/pr...

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait BA.1 二价疫苗的临床试验。
“第 2/3 期试验发现，与公司目前的 COVID-19 疫苗相比，两种 Omicron 适应疫苗候选者的加强剂量引发了对 Omicron BA.1 的显着更高的免疫反应”https://www.pfizer.com/新闻/公关...

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait No they weren't, they were bivalent or multivalent formulations studied in trials in 2021. They were never released.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 不，它们不是，它们是 2021 年在试验中研究的二价或多价配方。它们从未发布过。

@benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait It was known that there might be boosters. Nobody knew when or what strains they might be for, like how flu shots are regularly updated.

@benny171a @BertThere @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 众所周知，可能会有助推器。没有人知道他们可能会在什么时候或什么压力下使用，比如流感疫苗是如何定期更新的。

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Wrong. BA.1 booster had human trials, as did Beta and Delta boosters. The BA.5 is another strain of the exact same vaccine formulation.

@benny171a @lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 错了。 BA.1 助推器进行了人体试验，Beta 和 Delta 助推器也是如此。 BA.5 是完全相同疫苗配方的另一种菌株。

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait That wasn't day one, and yes there were a small number of breakthrough cases before delta, but not very many.

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 这不是第一天，是的，在三角洲之前有少数突破性案例，但不是很多。

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Stop spreading antivax nonsense.

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 停止传播antivax 的废话。

@CharlieBayer8 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@CharlieBayer8 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Dumb policy perhaps, but has nothing to do with vaccine efficacy.

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 可能是愚蠢的政策，但与疫苗功效无关。

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait It lasted until Omicron really, as long as you stayed up to date with a booster. That's around a year.
With Omicron the virus finally evaded the vaccine in a substantial way. But you're expecting people who said one thing a year earlier to know about a virus that didn't exist.

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 它一直持续到 Omicron 真的，只要你保持最新的助推器。也就是一年左右。
有了 Omicron，病毒终于在很大程度上避开了疫苗。但是你期望一年前说过一件事的人会知道一种不存在的病毒。

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No thanks, not interested in giving her money.

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不，谢谢，没兴趣给她钱。

@stevensquatch @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait You can disagree about policy (mandates), but that doesn't change the efficacy of the vaccines at the time.

@stevensquatch @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 您可以不同意政策（授权），但这不会改变当时疫苗的功效。

@BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No one ever said that. Biden said "you're not going to get covid" which was an imprecise and ill advised statement by a non-scientist (which was quickly correct by experts at the time). He never said "ever". You're the one lying.

@BertThere @benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 从来没有人这么说过。拜登说“你不会感染新冠病毒”，这是一个非科学家的不准确和不明智的声明（当时专家很快就纠正了）。他从来没有说过“永远”。你是那个说谎的人。

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No they were't. Testing at the time showed the vaccines were extremely effective at stopping infection.

@BigDongDeSantis @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不，他们不是。当时的测试表明，这些疫苗在阻止感染方面非常有效。

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Dude, that's literally what "lie" means. If you say something that turns out to be incorrect at some time in the future, but you believed it to be true based on available evidence at the time, that was NOT A LIE.

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 伙计，这就是“谎言”的字面意思。如果您说的某些话在未来某个时间被证明是不正确的，但您根据当时的可用证据相信它是正确的，那不是谎言。

@TrumpUndead @boodad12 @jonathanchait Nothing new, man.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

@TrumpUndead @boodad12 @jonathanchait 没什么新鲜的，伙计。
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Strain updates to the same vaccine formulation don't need a whole new round of testing. They never have in the past either.

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 相同疫苗配方的菌株更新不需要全新的一轮测试。他们过去也没有。

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait No, I'm not going to play sea lion with you. You can find all the studies yourself.

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 不，我不会和你玩海狮。你可以自己找到所有的研究。