@GooN849 @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait The difference is that the scientists are speaking in the present tense, based on evidence at the time. Biden made a forward looking statement that you're not GOING TO get covid, which is wrong. No one has a crystal ball.

@GooN849 @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 不同之处在于，根据当时的证据，科学家们用现在时态说话。拜登发表了一项前瞻性声明，称你不会感染新冠病毒，这是错误的。没有人有水晶球。

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Yes and no. It's the same formulation that has been used for two years modified for a different strain. That's the same method that is used with flu vaccines every year. You don't have to retest the same vaccine for every new strain.

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 是也不是。这是相同的配方，已经使用了两年，针对不同的菌株进行了修改。这与每年用于流感疫苗的方法相同。您不必为每种新毒株重新测试相同的疫苗。

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait No, Fauci and friends said they didn't know UNTIL studies showed that it did stop transmission, although the latter only persisted temporarily. That's not a lie, it is appropriate caution and revising guidance based on emerging evidence.

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不，Fauci 和朋友说他们不知道直到研究表明它确实停止了传播，尽管后者只是暂时持续存在。这不是谎言，而是适当的谨慎和基于新出现的证据修改指导。

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 1. That first tweet is edited. Stop posting misinformation.
2. If you hadn't edited it you could click the link to the study which showed ZERO vaccinated cases in South Africa. The tweet was correct.

@lotzof_gas @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 1. 第一条推文已编辑。停止发布错误信息。
2. 如果您没有编辑它，您可以单击该研究的链接，该研究显示南非接种疫苗的病例为零。推文是正确的。

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Yes, and no one said it would stop infection based on the initial clinical trial. They said they didn't know and that people should continue to take precautions to avoid infection and transmission.

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 是的，根据最初的临床试验，没有人说它会阻止感染。他们说他们不知道，人们应该继续采取预防措施以避免感染和传播。

@benny171a @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Learn to read.

@benny171a @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 学习阅读。

@benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Durability of vaccine immunity over time and variants, initially delta, which was the first to widely infect vaccinated people.

@benny171a @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 疫苗免疫力随时间和变体的持久性，最初是 delta，这是第一个广泛感染接种疫苗的人。

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait That's false. The CDC HCW study in early 2021 tested for infection and transmission.
It was one AFTER that study that CDC, etc. started saying that vaccines stopped infection. Previously they told people to keep their mask on after vax because they didn't know.

@boodad12 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 那是错误的。 CDC HCW 研究于 2021 年初进行了感染和传播测试。
在那项研究之后，CDC等开始说疫苗可以阻止感染。以前他们告诉人们在vax之后要戴上口罩，因为他们不知道。

@Farky @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait None of those took a year to admit anything. Boosters were authorized in less than a year.

@Farky @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 没有人花了一年时间承认任何事情。助推器在不到一年的时间内就获得了授权。

@benny171a @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait And? They did a study in South Africa (albeit somewhat small) and there were ZERO cases in vaccinated people. All cases in the study were unvaccinated.
Explained in the link in his tweet, which one could more easily see if you didn't edit it out (THAT is dishonest).

@benny171a @activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 还有？他们在南非进行了一项研究（尽管规模较小），接种疫苗的人的病例为零。研究中的所有病例均未接种疫苗。
在他的推文中的链接中进行了解释，如果您没有将其编辑出来，人们会更容易看到（这是不诚实的）。

@StuartMill1776 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait Nope. Efficacy was very high initially.

@StuartMill1776 @TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 不。最初的功效非常高。

@activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait Who is "they"? Papers got released within months. Boosters were recognized as a need and authorized within months.
Not everything bad that happens is a lie, friend. Sometimes things just don't go that well.

@activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait “他们”是谁？论文在几个月内发布。助推器被认为是一种需求，并在几个月内获得授权。
不是所有发生的坏事都是谎言，朋友。有时事情并不那么顺利。

@IamAsif57 @jonathanchait I'm honestly not sure, but he's clearly trying to frame it as not being a success.

@IamAsif57 @jonathanchait 老实说我不确定，但他显然试图将其视为不成功。

@IamAsif57 @jonathanchait His opponent?

@IamAsif57 @jonathanchait 他的对手？

@activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait I agree Biden's quote was a gaffe. Scientists don't say that though, when they report on studies, it is backward looking.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@activia513 @krtmd @jonathanchait 我同意拜登的话是失言。不过，科学家们并没有这么说，当他们报告研究时，它是向后看的。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait The lie is they weren't wrong at the time. Conditions changed.
You're not wrong about the temperature when you say "it is hot" the summer and then winter comes around.

@TrumpUndead @jonathanchait 谎言是他们当时并没有错。条件变了。
当你说夏天“很热”然后冬天来临时，你对温度没有错。

@sri_srikrishna @CleanAirStars @ocnj3 Sorry, that was extremely unclear. What I meant is that concentration reached depends on the volume (rate) of air exchange. With 1 ACH, a space with twice the volume will have half the concentration.

@sri_srikrishna @CleanAirStars @ocnj3 抱歉，这非常不清楚。我的意思是达到的浓度取决于空气交换的体积（速率）。使用 1 ACH，两倍体积的空间将有一半的浓度。

@sri_srikrishna @CleanAirStars @ocnj3 Rate of removal does but concentration reached and at equilibrium does depend on volume.

@sri_srikrishna @CleanAirStars @ocnj3 去除率确实，但达到的浓度和平衡确实取决于体积。

@amethystarlight @RemindMe_OfThis June 15, 2023

@amethystarlight @RemindMe_OfThis 2023 年 6 月 15 日

@RomainMartinIO @mildanalyst Better w/sound
https://twitter.com/ibrake4ant...

@RomainMartinIO @mildanalyst 有声更好
https://twitter.com/ibrake4ant...