@wsbgnl How is it possible they are actually that bad?

@wsbgnl他们怎么可能真的那么糟糕？

@DailyJLee @malthusian_trap @BryBrightside @ZiemniakKaren https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@DailyJLee@malthusian_trap@BryBrightside@ZiemniakKarenhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@malthusian_trap @BryBrightside @ZiemniakKaren @DailyJLee That depends on the range of cases you're talking about. Vax protection is just some linear ratio, maybe 10 or 20 optimistically. Cases can vary over many orders of magnitude.
There is never a "decouple" really, just a change in ratio.

@malthusian_trap@BryBrightside@ZiemniakKaren@DailyJLee，这取决于你所谈论的案例的范围。Vax保护只是一些线性比率，乐观地说可能是10或20。病例可以在多个数量级上变化。
从来没有真正的“脱钩”，只是比率的变化。

@BryBrightside @ZiemniakKaren @DailyJLee It mostly has to do with vaccination rate among most vulnerable populations. Yes there are other risk factors, access to care, comorbidities, etc. but they all pale by comparison to vax vs. unvax.

@BryBrightside@ZiemniakKaren@DailyJLee这主要与最脆弱人群的疫苗接种率有关。是的，还有其他风险因素，获得护理的机会，共病等，但与vax和unvax相比，它们都显得微不足道。

@ZiemniakKaren @BryBrightside @DailyJLee The difference in risk from those conditions is far smaller that the difference in risk from being vaccinated or not.

@ZiemniakKaren@BryBrightside@DailyJLee这些疾病的风险差异远小于接种与否的风险差异。

@wsbgnl Still...
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl仍然。。。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl You're correct. I found the video and he is indeed saying it was a good question (w/a pause). I'm going to delete my reply since I misinterpreted and was suggesting the opposite.

@你说得对。我找到了视频，他确实说这是一个好问题（停顿）。我将删除我的回复，因为我误解了，并提出了相反的建议。

@LanceBurkhart4 @michaelmina_lab @AlexanderDent6 The symptoms are not directly from the virus itself but from your immune system responding to the virus, which happens faster if vaccinated.

@LanceBurkhart4@michaelmina_lab@AlexanderDent6这些症状不是直接来自病毒本身，而是来自你的免疫系统对病毒的反应，如果接种疫苗，这种反应会更快。

@wsbgnl Could be.

@wsbgnl可能是。

@kermalou @MnMarches @HighbrowHaze @thedavidcrosby It's not about the amount of money, it is about Spotify paying for an exclusive, essentially turning him into an integral part of their product. They're not just a platform at that point.

@kermalou@MnMarches@HighbrowHaze@thedavidcrossby这不是钱的多少，而是Spotify为独家付费，本质上把他变成他们产品不可或缺的一部分。在这一点上，它们不仅仅是一个平台。

@celinegounder People don't even necessarily have the choice to go to work sick. They may be too sick to go to work (or a family member might be too sick to leave), or they might get sent home with no pay if symptomatic.
Either way, potentially devastating loss of income.

@celinegounder人甚至不一定有选择生病上班。他们可能病得太重而不能上班（或者家人可能病得太重而不能离开），或者如果出现症状，他们可能会被送回家而没有工资。
无论哪种情况，都有可能造成毁灭性的收入损失。

@mosermusic Data is beautiful

@大多数音乐数据都很漂亮

@wsbgnl And no, this isn't the only thing they can do. https://t.co/JRnybVffhc

@不，这不是他们唯一能做的事。https://t.co/JRnybVffhc

@wsbgnl You elided the worst part, where he suggests asking why the US has the lowest rate of booster uptake of any high income country even among people who got two doses is not a "good question". https://t.co/koqJxVxd70

@wsbgnl你省略了最糟糕的部分，他建议问为什么美国在所有高收入国家中，即使是在服用两剂的人群中，服用助推器的比例最低，这不是一个“好问题”。https://t.co/koqJxVxd70

@Marco_Piani @Billius27 She also argues that these restrictions need to be dropped because of "public opinion" despite all objective evidence of public opinion being very much in favor of what little restrictions there are (and often supporting more).

@Marco_Piani@Billius27她还认为，这些限制需要取消，因为“公众舆论”尽管所有客观证据表明公众舆论非常支持那些限制很少的限制（通常支持更多）。

@Marco_Piani @Billius27 For one thing, she repeatedly, and one can only assume performatively, argues against "restrictions", of which there are basically none except local mask mandates in a small portion of the country (almost never enforced) and on airplanes (somewhat enforced).

@Marco_Piani@Billius27首先，她反复反对“限制”，人们只能以表演的方式进行反驳。除了在该国一小部分地区（几乎从未实施）和飞机上（在一定程度上实施）的当地口罩授权外，基本上没有其他限制。

@NAtancohen1 @EricTopol @Catlove40476297 This doesn't say cycle time is two days, it says start of infectiousness is two days. Not the same thing.

@NAtancohen1@EricTopol@Catlove40476297这并不是说周期时间是两天，而是说感染的开始时间是两天。不一样。

@PlainolBlackman @EricTopol This is all based on the original virus, not variants.

@PlainolBlackman@EricTopol这一切都是基于原始病毒，而不是变种。

@ar11175007 @wsbgnl Are they not, or is it just her?

@ar11175007@wsbgnl他们不是吗，还是只有她？

@DropletsAreFake @JHowardBrainMD I don't think it was the committee that was the issue. The vote was unanimous (one abstained but it wasn't Meissner). The push back was mostly from outside commentators.

@DropletsAreFake@JHowardBrainMD我不认为是委员会的问题。投票结果是一致的（一人弃权，但不是梅斯纳）。反击主要来自外部评论员。